Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what is the remedy when that happens? Who does the constitution say is the judge of elections?Article 2 : sec 1 ..clearly states only state legislatures can make election changes and not rogue govs or courts
Not a single one was ever examined because the fake courts were scared of the woke terroristThere is no evidence to look at as the courts have consistently and repeatedly ruled.And they refused to look at the evidence and the thousands of affidavitsYou have the 60 court cases, where they couldn't explain or show how the alleged fraud happened either.My feeling is if people can't explain or show how the alleged fraud happened, then why should anyone believe it? Just because someone says it happened? That's baloney.
They simply refused and did not want Blm and Antifa at their homes
While an affidavit is a written or sworn statement, in and of itself, it is not evidence of fraud. For example, if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election, they're not to reverse the results on my word only. They're gong to want to see supporting evidence, and if none is produced, my affidavit won't be enough, especially considering the fact that when it comes to elections, people have agendas, and a lot of people have overactive imaginations, or they just outright lie.
Actually, Trump never made it to 50 percent approval – the first modern president to manage that ‘accomplishment.’When is that going to happen. The highest job approval Trump ever got was 50%The Biden administration is going to make Trump look like the best president that ever resided over this nation. It's coming, and your words are going to be very bitter to swallow as you attempt to stuff your over bloated tripe down that narrow little throat you probably got.
Bidens lowest job approval was 52%, and now he's at around 60% job approval.
Yeah, Bidens 60% job approval makes him look like a loser, compared to Trumps 42% when he left office,
What does "winning by a landslide" mean to you?Can you blame T
He won by a landslide and the election was stolen
Mitch is a puppet of China and pence is a jar head
He won the 6 contested statesWhat does "winning by a landslide" mean to you?Can you blame T
He won by a landslide and the election was stolen
Mitch is a puppet of China and pence is a jar head
You glossed over the part of " if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election,"While an affidavit is a written or sworn statement, in and of itself, it is not evidence of fraud. For example, if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election, they're not to reverse the results on my word only. They're gong to want to see supporting evidence, and if none is produced, my affidavit won't be enough,...
And zero investigationsYou glossed over the part of " if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election,"While an affidavit is a written or sworn statement, in and of itself, it is not evidence of fraud. For example, if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election, they're not to reverse the results on my word only. They're gong to want to see supporting evidence, and if none is produced, my affidavit won't be enough,...
Most of the affidavits were just like you posted. People talking about suspicious behavior, or an anomaly that they "believed" to be voter fraud. Only a couple of affidavits stated an actual fraud like a election official making a mark on a ballot.
So you actually counted the votes, each and every one in 6 different states did you?He won the 6 contested statesWhat does "winning by a landslide" mean to you?Can you blame T
He won by a landslide and the election was stolen
Mitch is a puppet of China and pence is a jar head
A very big win
No, it does not. Here's what Article 2 Sec 1 states:Article 2 : sec 1 ..clearly states only state legislatures can make election changes and not rogue govs or courts
It was a giant fraudSo you actually counted the votes, each and every one in 6 different states did you?He won the 6 contested statesWhat does "winning by a landslide" mean to you?Can you blame T
He won by a landslide and the election was stolen
Mitch is a puppet of China and pence is a jar head
A very big win
I was referring to a Rasmussen poll. The ones where he gives republicans a 5% higher score than any other poll. If you use the realclearpolitics rolling average, then Trump never made it to 50%.Actually, Trump never made it to 50 percent approval – the first modern president to manage that ‘accomplishment.’
Don't just make pronouncements. Provide evidence.And zero investigationsYou glossed over the part of " if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election,"While an affidavit is a written or sworn statement, in and of itself, it is not evidence of fraud. For example, if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election, they're not to reverse the results on my word only. They're gong to want to see supporting evidence, and if none is produced, my affidavit won't be enough,...
Most of the affidavits were just like you posted. People talking about suspicious behavior, or an anomaly that they "believed" to be voter fraud. Only a couple of affidavits stated an actual fraud like a election official making a mark on a ballot.
Millions of votes counted that should have been tossed out
I am not going to post thousands of affidavitsDon't just make pronouncements. Provide evidence.And zero investigationsYou glossed over the part of " if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election,"While an affidavit is a written or sworn statement, in and of itself, it is not evidence of fraud. For example, if I sign an affidavit claiming that I witnessed what I believed to be a fraud in an election, they're not to reverse the results on my word only. They're gong to want to see supporting evidence, and if none is produced, my affidavit won't be enough,...
Most of the affidavits were just like you posted. People talking about suspicious behavior, or an anomaly that they "believed" to be voter fraud. Only a couple of affidavits stated an actual fraud like a election official making a mark on a ballot.
Millions of votes counted that should have been tossed out
To my understanding, because Trump lost the popular vote in 2016 to Hillary, ensuring that the next election would be secure, Trump in 2018 hired Christopher Kreb as head of CISA, the agency in charge of election security. Kreb, a Republican, disputed Trump's claims that the election was stolen and stated that the 2020 election was the most secure in U.S. history, speaking as someone with personal firsthand knowledge because that was his job. Therefore his statement didn't come out of nowhere and he had every reason to be confident in his assessment.The quick pronouncement that it was the most "secure" election in our history does seem very suspect. Surely, there should have been a bi-partisan investigation before making such a cocksure statement.
