Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,391
- 9,170
I don't live in a taker state. I have no supporting vote. My elected officials don't play those games.Do I?But you love wealth redistribution, so what's the problem?
Yes, you do, so you really have nobody but yourself to blame. You're the one who elects these politicians who want more centralized control in D.C. so they can divvy up slices of the pie based on who lobbies them the most or which Congressman has the most seniority. Then you come here and bellyache about "taker states." As I said initially, maybe the moral of the story here is that bigger, centralized government isn't the answer. Would California and New York be better off if most of their tax dollars never left their states in the first place so they can spend their own money on themselves instead of having to beg for it back?
The concept of a taker state does not require whatever the fuck all ^ that was.
The takers are the ones who contribute little to your pie yet recieve a very large slice.
Exactly, so why do you keep voting for it and then come back here bitching about the consequences of your vote?