DC Grocery Store Puts Limit on Bag Size You Can Bring In

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
93,672
65,068
2,605
Right coast, classified
Seems DEMOCRATS love to STEAL from others. And the DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT has no ambition to PREVENT thieves.

And then the Left whine about food deserts when all the stores leave.


“The term “food desert” emerged in the 1970s and 80s, but in the past decade has really caught on, and is now a common concept in economic and public health fields. The racial demographics of the areas described by this term are most often Black and Latino.”

:auiqs.jpg:


 
Seems DEMOCRATS love to STEAL from others. And the DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT has no ambition to PREVENT thieves.

And then the Left whine about food deserts when all the stores leave.


“The term “food desert” emerged in the 1970s and 80s, but in the past decade has really caught on, and is now a common concept in economic and public health fields. The racial demographics of the areas described by this term are most often Black and Latino.”

:auiqs.jpg:



We have Apple stores in Toronto which employ two security guards and you have to buzz in to enter, one or two at a time.

Welcome to global inflation and the waste of so much money over so many decades on so many cults that milk the system that there is little money left for frutiful social programs and less interest in G-d and morality.

When our role models still billions, why would the peasants care if they steal $50 worth of stuff? No one is buying an island somewhere by stealing food.
 
WEF/Democrats Goal is to drive private business out of business and make it impossible to operate, so they can replace all the stores with government stores that ration.
Do they limit how many bags you can bring?
 
Seems DEMOCRATS love to STEAL from others. And the DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT has no ambition to PREVENT thieves.

And then the Left whine about food deserts when all the stores leave.


“The term “food desert” emerged in the 1970s and 80s, but in the past decade has really caught on, and is now a common concept in economic and public health fields. The racial demographics of the areas described by this term are most often Black and Latino.”

:auiqs.jpg:



Fox news? Didn't say anything about limiting how much you can buy.
 
That will only last until some fat black hood rat starts screaming about racism and how the store is being racist against her meanwhile everyone else that isn't black is following the rule right next to her.

This still proves my point. If we treat criminals, dopeheads and crazy people like what they truly are and jail them and or separate them from society we wouldn't need these ridiculous rules. If you take the bad people out of a society the decent ones can do anything they want and everything is fine.

Rules like this don't actually solve anything. Rules like this are ways decent people are forced to accept crime. Having to check your bag size is politicians forcing non criminals to conform to criminals.

Criminals should be the ones forced to change, not society to change for criminals.
 
A bag search is mandatory if you bring a sizable bag to a supermarket in Australia. As a precaution, most Aussies do not carry any bags at all when they shop.

My wife and I recently had an interesting experience at an ASICS outlet in Marsden Park, Australia, that differed from our shopping experiences in other countries. In most places we've lived, including the UK, US, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong, it's uncommon for shopkeepers to request a check of shopping bags. However, in Australia, we've noticed a more thorough approach, including checks of personal bags.

For example, today, a shopkeeper insisted on searching my wife's shoulder bag, which led to a bit of a disagreement. This practice seems to be more prevalent in Australia, as we've observed similar checks at stores like JB Hi-Fi and Big W, where they often have a dedicated spot at the exit for this purpose.

This approach to customer security is quite different from what we've experienced in other countries. In premium places like Lane Crawford in Hong Kong or Yodobashi in Osaka, such practices would be unusual and might negatively impact the customer experience, especially considering the higher value of items in those stores.

We understand that each country has its own retail practices, but we can't help but feel a bit uncomfortable with this level of scrutiny. It raises questions for us about privacy and customer trust.

This difference in approach leads me to ponder the cultural or historical roots of such practices in Australia. I'm particularly curious about whether this might be connected to Australia's history, where a significant portion of the early colonial population were convicts. Could this historical factor influence current retail security practices and the general perception of trust in society?

 
Are the climate clowns still bringing in their nasty mold filled and meat rancid bags?
Anything democrats try to force on Americans, like reusing bags, is meant to harm Americans.

When you realize democrats are America's enemy trying to destroy America, everything they support makes sense. You can even predict what they will support next.
 
Anything democrats try to force on Americans, like reusing bags, is meant to harm Americans.

When you realize democrats are America's enemy trying to destroy America, everything they support makes sense. You can even predict what they will support next.
They are demonic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top