Debunking another new atheist's baby talk on Youtube

[ding]

My education background is in engineering.

Irrelevant. What matters is that you clearly have had no logic training.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a milliliter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

I’m an engineer. I use logic everyday.

What are your qualifications in logic?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

My education background is in engineering.

Irrelevant. What matters is that you clearly have had no logic training.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a milliliter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Did you even graduate from high school?

Answer the question.

Was the statement true, or false?

 

[ding]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

 

[ding]

My education background is in engineering.

Irrelevant. What matters is that you clearly have had no logic training.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a milliliter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Did you even graduate from high school?

Answer the question.

Was the statement true, or false?

First answer mine. What are your qualifications?

It doesn’t make much sense for me to discuss this with a 7 11 cashier, right?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

 

[ding]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

The natural laws were in existence before space and time itself because the same laws which prescribe the evolution of space and time also prescribe the creation of space and time.

 

[ding]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

To all:

Hey guys...why do you suppose ding won't answer the question, after displaying so much confidence in his own knowledge of logic?

 

[ding]

It is literally the reason why the SLoT precludes an infinite acting universe.

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

You just accused me of what you are doing.

There’s that pesky logic thing again.

 

[ding]

To all:

Hey guys...why do you suppose ding won't answer the question, after displaying so much confidence in his own knowledge of logic?

Simple. Because I want to know your qualifications first.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

...beginning at the point where the natural laws begin. This point in time can occur more than once. Again, I have no interest in debating your creationist talking points based in 30 year old physics.

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

You just accused me of what you are doing.

There’s that pesky logic thing again.

Neat!

Worth noting: ding the charlatan asked his question in an attempt to avoid my question. He will not be answering my simple question, because he does not know the amswer.

 

[ding]

To all:

Hey guys...why do you suppose ding won't answer the question, after displaying so much confidence in his own knowledge of logic?

If you are so eminently qualifies in the use of logic then why won’t you tell us what your qualifications are?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Because I want to know your qualifications first.

Which is stupid, embarrassing, and transparent, as my background has no bearing on the answer. You're not fooling anyone.

Nor will you be working up the stones to give an answer.

 

[ding]

How does this change thermodynamics?

You do realize that all objects are equilibrating, right?

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

You just accused me of what you are doing.

There’s that pesky logic thing again.

Neat!

Worth noting: ding the charlatan asked his question in an attempt to avoid my question. He will not be answering my simple question, because he does not know the amswer.

So you can’t follow the logic that you need to provide your qualifications if you are going to assert you are an expert on the subject?

I’ve testified as an expert witnesses a half dozen times or so and my testimony always starts with why I am qualified to testify.

So what are you qualifications in the use of logic?

 

[ding]

Because I want to know your qualifications first.

Which is stupid, embarrassing, and transparent, as my background has no bearing on the answer. You're not fooling anyone.

Nor will you be working up the stones to give an answer.

See my last post on the need to provide qualifications if you are going to assert to be an expert on a subject.

It’s not that complicated.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Ignored.

Is the following statement true, or is it false?:

"If dolphins build skyscrapers, then a millimeter is equal to a cubic kilometer."

Hint: my background is irrelvant to the correct answer.

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

You just accused me of what you are doing.

There’s that pesky logic thing again.

Neat!

Worth noting: ding the charlatan asked his question in an attempt to avoid my question. He will not be answering my simple question, because he does not know the amswer.

So you can’t follow the logic that you need to provide your qualifications if you are going to assert you are an expert on the subject?

I’ve testified as an expert witnesses a half dozen times or so and my testimony always starts with why I am qualified to testify.

So what are you qualifications in the use of logic?

Sorry ding. None of that is relevant to the correct answer to the question...an answer which anyone trained in the most basic principles of logic could provide.

You simply do not know the answer. And hey, that's okay. We are all ignorant of a great many things. It's your refusal to learn anything that makes you a twat.

 

[ding]

Because I want to know your qualifications first.

Which is stupid, embarrassing, and transparent, as my background has no bearing on the answer. You're not fooling anyone.

Nor will you be working up the stones to give an answer.

Are you saying you aren’t an expert on the use of logic?

 

[ding]

You’re embarrassed by your background.

Neat!

You are afraid of answering the question. We all know why.

You just accused me of what you are doing.

There’s that pesky logic thing again.

Neat!

Worth noting: ding the charlatan asked his question in an attempt to avoid my question. He will not be answering my simple question, because he does not know the amswer.

So you can’t follow the logic that you need to provide your qualifications if you are going to assert you are an expert on the subject?

I’ve testified as an expert witnesses a half dozen times or so and my testimony always starts with why I am qualified to testify.

So what are you qualifications in the use of logic?

Sorry ding. None of that is relevant to the correct answer to the question...an answer which anyone trained in the most basic principles of logic could provide.

You simply do not know the answer. And hey, that's okay. We are all ignorant of a great many things. It's your refusal to learn anything that makes you a twat.

I don’t need advice from a guy making minimum wage, bro.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Are you saying you aren’t an expert on the use of logic?

I am saying that is irrelevant to the answer. For the 5th time.

Haha, poor ding.