Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it's a good idea and I guess I'm not the only one. I think the assault weapons should also be confiscated/bought back and if anyone is caught with one after a certain point, they get a fine that will take years to settle.You should take that act on the road!!!!Alright, ban the bullets instead.No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
But, good of you to admit banning the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' will do noting to meet the necessities claimed by the Democrats.
Given this, why do you think the Democrats are lock-step on this policy point?
I'd vote for that.
No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
Look, I've been through this whole discussion so many times that I have your responses and mine memorized. Not really in the mood for a full blown "What's an Assault Rifle" game right now fellas. You know what is meant and yes, if it included buy backs and confiscation, it would put a huge dent in mass shootings. But yeah you guys need to keep shooting each other so no, I'll never see the day and that's all I've got to say on the subject today./——/ Problem is gun grabber, assault weapons don’t exist. It’s s made up word Libs use to demonize firearms.I think it's a good idea and I guess I'm not the only one. I think the assault weapons should also be confiscated/bought back and if anyone is caught with one after a certain point, they get a fine that will take years to settle.You should take that act on the road!!!!Alright, ban the bullets instead.No surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
But, good of you to admit banning the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' will do noting to meet the necessities claimed by the Democrats.
Given this, why do you think the Democrats are lock-step on this policy point?
I'd vote for that.
None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.Nut jobs with military style weapons that seemsThe dems always whine about guns, and then nothing happens, they are banned in Chicago, how is that working?
It's not the guns, the US always had guns, and no mass shootings, what's different now?
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.Nut jobs with military style weapons that seemsThe dems always whine about guns, and then nothing happens, they are banned in Chicago, how is that working?
It's not the guns, the US always had guns, and no mass shootings, what's different now?
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
Proving once again that all you know is garbage propaganda,. The a r 15 was designed as an assault weapon and should have won the competition. Some people say the M16 is derived from the AR-15. You are just absolutely full of s***.https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...Vaw1h-b-PHmUFNUcOVo-y43Fd&cshid=1562022288235No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
"You know the difference between these things, which I know nothing about but am just SURE exists, so you must be a liar if you don't say what I want to believe."
By all means, OldBroad, tell us this alleged difference, in your "infinite knowledge" about guns. Or even just tell us the definition of "assault weapon", since you like to parrot that phrase so much and pretend it's oh-so-eeeeevil.
Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
As always you are totally full of crap. It was designed as a military assault rifle and the tumbling bullet is a huge killer. Another reason why you shouldn't use it on deer or varmints. You people are brainwashed functional cretins....Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
Wrong, dumb ass.......the military went with the smaller 5.56 round because they wanted the infantry to be able to carry more bullets.....the tumble effect is a flaw, not a feature because it is a smaller, lighter bullet, you dope. Our troops complain, today, that at longer ranges it isn't as effective as other rounds against enemy perssonel.
None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.Nut jobs with military style weapons that seemsThe dems always whine about guns, and then nothing happens, they are banned in Chicago, how is that working?
It's not the guns, the US always had guns, and no mass shootings, what's different now?
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
So the difference is that military style can be automatic. Domestics can not . BECAUSE of the law.
Otherwise it’s a straight up war weapon .
It is a military assault weapon no matter how much crap you spew, brainwashed functional moron. And it drives people like you absolutely insane way too often....Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer...
What makes it a super killer? When a mass shooter uses it in a gun free zone, against unarmed people at a distance of less than 30 feet where he has easy shots and the victims can't shoot back or get away.........which means the same level of lethality would apply to any gun....you moron, even pistols....as the Virginia Tech shooting showed.....32 dead with 2 pistols....and the Luby's Cafe shooting showed....24 dead, 2 pistols.....
As always you are totally full of crap. It was designed as a military assault rifle and the tumbling bullet is a huge killer. Another reason why you shouldn't use it on deer or varmints. You people are brainwashed functional cretins....Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.Lol
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
Wrong, dumb ass.......the military went with the smaller 5.56 round because they wanted the infantry to be able to carry more bullets.....the tumble effect is a flaw, not a feature because it is a smaller, lighter bullet, you dope. Our troops complain, today, that at longer ranges it isn't as effective as other rounds against enemy perssonel.
As always you are totally full of crap. It was designed as a military assault rifle and the tumbling bullet is a huge killer. Another reason why you shouldn't use it on deer or varmints. You people are brainwashed functional cretins....Pure b*******. It was designed as an assault weapon and has a tumbling effect that makes it a super killer... It won the competition with the M14.I've owned firearms since the age of 8 and served in the military. I've fired everything from a .22 pistol to a heavy machine gun. The firearms I can buy down at my local gun shop are not "assault weapons".No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.Lol
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
the GOP and the NRA are totally full of s*** on this, but you dupes will believe anything they say. 100 times a day
Wrong, dumb ass.......the military went with the smaller 5.56 round because they wanted the infantry to be able to carry more bullets.....the tumble effect is a flaw, not a feature because it is a smaller, lighter bullet, you dope. Our troops complain, today, that at longer ranges it isn't as effective as other rounds against enemy perssonel.
None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.Nut jobs with military style weapons that seems
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
So the difference is that military style can be automatic. Domestics can not . BECAUSE of the law.
Otherwise it’s a straight up war weapon .
Yes, a pointless law. With over 18 million semi-automatic rifles in private hands in the U.S......and that is a low count........and over 320 million people in the country.....
All rifle types accounted for 403 gun murders...which means the AR-15 is responsible for even fewer deaths than that..........
So again, if you think we should ban the AR-15 over less than 403 gun murders ....then we need to ban knives which are used to kill over 1,500 people every year, and cars that have killed over 38,000 people a year.....
Banning the sales for the billionth time, brainwashed functional moron. That at least would stop some military style Nut Job most of the time..None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.Nut jobs with military style weapons that seems
to go right along with their insanity.... They seem to like buying them at stores or gun shows.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
So the difference is that military style can be automatic. Domestics can not . BECAUSE of the law.
Otherwise it’s a straight up war weapon .
Yes, a pointless law. With over 18 million semi-automatic rifles in private hands in the U.S......and that is a low count........and over 320 million people in the country.....
All rifle types accounted for 403 gun murders...which means the AR-15 is responsible for even fewer deaths than that..........
So again, if you think we should ban the AR-15 over less than 403 gun murders ....then we need to ban knives which are used to kill over 1,500 people every year, and cars that have killed over 38,000 people a year.....
None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
So the difference is that military style can be automatic. Domestics can not . BECAUSE of the law.
Otherwise it’s a straight up war weapon .
Yes, a pointless law. With over 18 million semi-automatic rifles in private hands in the U.S......and that is a low count........and over 320 million people in the country.....
All rifle types accounted for 403 gun murders...which means the AR-15 is responsible for even fewer deaths than that..........
So again, if you think we should ban the AR-15 over less than 403 gun murders ....then we need to ban knives which are used to kill over 1,500 people every year, and cars that have killed over 38,000 people a year.....
Gotta start somewhere .
Lots of illegals in America too. Should we do nothing about it ?
Banning the sales for the billionth time, brainwashed functional moron. That at least would stop some military style Nut Job most of the time..None of the weapons I fired in the military can be bought at a gun store.
Because of gun control laws that got passed despite GOP objections .
Ok gun nerds. Explain to us dopes the difference tween what the military is using in Afghanistan vs say, what the Florida high school shooter used ?
Very simple, I would say so simple that even you could understand it, but since you keep asking this question, it must be hard for you to grasp.
The military uses a select fire weapon. The weapon can be fired single fire or in a 3 round burst. Older models were fully automatic fire.
If it doesn't have a select fire capability, it is not a modern military weapon.
Also, The Wild West Rifle, the Lever Action gun, like you saw on the show, "The Rifleman?" That was an actual military weapon. The 6 shot revolver, used by the American military and was first patented in 1836......it is a semi-automatic weapon?
The 5 shot, pump action shotgun.....is a current military weapon, in use by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The Bolt action rifle, is a current military weapon, used by our current armed forces in current combat zones.
The AR-15 has never been used by the military and has never been used in combat.
So the difference is that military style can be automatic. Domestics can not . BECAUSE of the law.
Otherwise it’s a straight up war weapon .
Yes, a pointless law. With over 18 million semi-automatic rifles in private hands in the U.S......and that is a low count........and over 320 million people in the country.....
All rifle types accounted for 403 gun murders...which means the AR-15 is responsible for even fewer deaths than that..........
So again, if you think we should ban the AR-15 over less than 403 gun murders ....then we need to ban knives which are used to kill over 1,500 people every year, and cars that have killed over 38,000 people a year.....
You have no clue what you are talkin about, brainwashed functional moron. Definition of assault rifle....AR-15 always involved. They were actually in a competition to become the army's weapon and should have won...http://go.skimresources.com/?id=162.../alerts&xtz=240&jv=13.20.0-stackpath&bv=2.5.1No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
"You know the difference between these things, which I know nothing about but am just SURE exists, so you must be a liar if you don't say what I want to believe."
By all means, OldBroad, tell us this alleged difference, in your "infinite knowledge" about guns. Or even just tell us the definition of "assault weapon", since you like to parrot that phrase so much and pretend it's oh-so-eeeeevil.
You have no clue what you are talkin about, brainwashed functional moron. Definition of assault rifle....AR-15 always involved. They were actually in a competition to become the army's weapon and should have won...http://go.skimresources.com/?id=1629X694351&xs=1&isjs=1&url=https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.britannica.com/technology/assault-rifle&ved=2ahUKEwjHyKux6ZTjAhXymeAKHQj5BIAQFjAAegQIBhAB&usg=AOvVaw1h-b-PHmUFNUcOVo-y43Fd&cshid=1562022288235&xguid=deac80949ee3841282e285c105b2cec3&xuuid=6578c6a5acc60386ee7cd8de9e0aad69&xsessid=&xcreo=0&xed=0&sref=http://www.usmessageboard.com/threads/dem-2020-presidential-platform-ban-assault-weapons.763840/page-21#post-22637425&pref=http://www.usmessageboard.com/account/alerts&xtz=240&jv=13.20.0-stackpath&bv=2.5.1No mass shooters are fucked in the head. You sell guns. You know the difference between a "sporting rifle" and an assault weapon, you dishonest shyster. Don't play word games.LolNo surprise, right?
Every Dem who spoke on guns in the 2 nights of debate declared the need to ban 'assault weapon' - to save our schools, to save our kids, shopping malls, movie theaters, gay bars, etc. It's almost as if this little bit of leftist dogma is chiseled into their souls.
A question for those who agree with the candidates:
If there is, as they claim, a NEED to ban these guns, if banning these guns is, as they say, NECESSARY for the safety of whomever - what does a ban on the manufacturer and sale of new 'assault weapons' accomplish?
Even though they are just sporting rifles nothing more nothing less...
All progressives are fucked in the head
"You know the difference between these things, which I know nothing about but am just SURE exists, so you must be a liar if you don't say what I want to believe."
By all means, OldBroad, tell us this alleged difference, in your "infinite knowledge" about guns. Or even just tell us the definition of "assault weapon", since you like to parrot that phrase so much and pretend it's oh-so-eeeeevil.
