DEMOCRAT Former CIA Officer: Dems Setting 'horrific precedent' / 'Attempt To Kneecap President'

Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.

The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
 
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
 
Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
No wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.

I did not say Wright's identity was not important. I said his identity is NOT AS IMPORTANT as the simple, factual information he shared.
 
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker

Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
 
Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.

The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
Now he has the call transcript and feels differently now
 
Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
No wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.

I did not say Wright's identity was not important. I said his identity is NOT AS IMPORTANT as the simple, factual information he shared.

What's the first word in your title?

What's the only word in ALL CAPS?

Hm?

And what relevance does it have to anything at all?

GET IT NOW Dumbass?

My proverbial hat is off to those who actually have the patience to teach Special Ed...
 
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker

Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?
 
Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
No wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.

I did not say Wright's identity was not important. I said his identity is NOT AS IMPORTANT as the simple, factual information he shared.

What's the first word in your title?

What's the only word in ALL CAPS?

Hm?

And what relevance does it have to anything at all?

GET IT NOW Dumbass?

My proverbial hat is off to those who actually have the patience to teach Special Ed...
Really? Weak
 
Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.

The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
Now he has the call transcript and feels differently now

Provide a link the IG changed his mind.
 
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker

Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?

He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
 
The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
A CIA Agent making such an accusation would appear to be 'credible' based on the fact alone that he is a CIA Agent; however, when you look beyond that, as Wright points out, the accusation completely falls apart:

The whistle blower:
- Is a politically biased individual
- Is a supporter of a Democratic Party 2020 Hopeful
- Is not very well known
- Was temporarily working in the WH for a very short time
- Is a specialist in European / Ukraine politics ' operations - a convenient circumstance in this case
- Has ZERO 1st hand-account knowledge
- Their sources are other politically biased anti-Trump
- As soon as they made their complain they returned to the CIA

Let's go further:

The primary individuals pushing this story are:

Nadler:
The guy who demanded the chief law enforcer in the United States, the US AG, violate US Law - law that Nadler helped pass, and then he punished the US AG for REFUSING to break the law.

Schiff:
- The traitor whop lied repeatedly Congress and to the country, declaring he personally had direct evidence of the President braking the law that Mueller and his team did not even have

- The guy who coached the President's former lawyer - who was already on his way to prison for Perjury before Congress - before his 2nd appearance before Congress, during which time he committed Perjury again (as well as destroyed the Democrats' false narrative)

- The criminal who has leaked more than a screen door on a submarine
 
Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.

The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
Now he has the call transcript and feels differently now

Provide a link the IG changed his mind.
Why? Nothing in the document is accurate to the transcript. Prove the leaker is even real
Whistleblower hearing live blog: Acting intelligence director defends handling of "unprecedented" whistleblower complaint in House committee today - CBS News
“Later, he seemingly contradicted himself: "I did not agree it should be investigated." Maguire ”
 
Last edited:
He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
He got the DATE and the PERSON the President was speaking to correct - that's all. The Prime Minister of Ukraine has already debunked the false narrative by setting the record straight - 'It did NOT happen'.

Perhaps you are suggesting we should believe Schiff over the Prime Minister of Ukraine...baste on.....Schiff's amazingly honest / proven credible record?

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker

Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?

He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
Nope, he wasn’t on the call! Couldn’t have heard anything except his own heart beating
 
He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
He got the DATE and the PERSON the President was speaking to correct - that's all. The Prime Minister of Ukraine has already debunked the false narrative by setting the record straight - 'It did NOT happen'.

:rolleyes:

The PM did? I don't think so.

The President on the other hand is between a rock and a hard place thanks to the position Trump put him in.

The memo the WH put out about the phone call is damning enough, I'd like to see the complete whistle blower complaint investigated and the complete transcript released to the public to get to the bottom of this. I'm sure you agree with transparency, rather than believing unsubstantiated bullshit like Schiff planted a spy.
 
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker

Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?

He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
Nope, he wasn’t on the call! Couldn’t have heard anything except his own heart beating

We've already seen something that looks incriminating and worthy of an investigation. If Obama had done this you'd be calling for his head.
 

Forum List

Back
Top