Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
His identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
No wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
Now he has the call transcript and feels differently nowHis identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
No wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
I did not say Wright's identity was not important. I said his identity is NOT AS IMPORTANT as the simple, factual information he shared.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
Really? WeakNo wonder you can't follow the simple explanation about what Wright gives, snowflake - you just demonstrated you are TOO STUPID to understand the English language.Then explain your thread title, Dumbass.
I did not say Wright's identity was not important. I said his identity is NOT AS IMPORTANT as the simple, factual information he shared.
What's the first word in your title?
What's the only word in ALL CAPS?
Hm?
And what relevance does it have to anything at all?
GET IT NOW Dumbass?
My proverbial hat is off to those who actually have the patience to teach Special Ed...
Now he has the call transcript and feels differently nowHis identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
He’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
A CIA Agent making such an accusation would appear to be 'credible' based on the fact alone that he is a CIA Agent; however, when you look beyond that, as Wright points out, the accusation completely falls apart:The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
Why? Nothing in the document is accurate to the transcript. Prove the leaker is even realNow he has the call transcript and feels differently nowHis identity is not nearly important as the facts he presents.Never heard of the guy. I suspect he's a Democrat who supports Trump. Ok, why should I care about his opinion?
The IG found the complaint credible and because of the whistleblower we now know about this call (though not a word for word complete transcript) which appears to be incriminating of the president. Of course the president didn't meet the 'shoot someone on fifth avenue' threshold so you'll never admit it.
Provide a link the IG changed his mind.
He got the DATE and the PERSON the President was speaking to correct - that's all. The Prime Minister of Ukraine has already debunked the false narrative by setting the record straight - 'It did NOT happen'.He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
Nope, he wasn’t on the call! Couldn’t have heard anything except his own heart beatingHe’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
He got the DATE and the PERSON the President was speaking to correct - that's all. The Prime Minister of Ukraine has already debunked the false narrative by setting the record straight - 'It did NOT happen'.He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.
![]()
Nope, he wasn’t on the call! Couldn’t have heard anything except his own heart beatingHe’s a leaker who has no knowledge of anything! Name the person he got the information from then, right?How isn’t this interference to the upcoming election? I hear hypocrites parroting loudly. Let’s get the name of the person who gave out the information to the leaker
Let's follow the law and allow the whistle blower all the safeguards the law affords them.
He seemed to have nailed the phone call. This is why we are going to have an investigation, duh.