JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
Democrats have a real challenge in this impeachment effort they are making vrs Trump.
They are claiming that it is a violation of our Constitution for American officials to 'dig up dirt' on their political opponents, even if it is actually enforcing actual law and that official is a law enforcement officer. 'Digging up dirt' would presumably cover things like the research done with the Steel Dossier that Clinton and the DNC paid for, and that would also therefore be a violation of the Constitution too, but they don't want that investigated.
So I guess they think it is unconstitutional only if a Democrat is targeted for said investigation no matter how many billions and billions of US dollars the politician running for office gets paid. No matter what the details, if a Democrat is running for office it is unconstitutional for them to be investigated by anyone.
But here is the Biden Paradox.
1) It was Hunter Biden that was actually given all these billions, not Joe Biden himself, who claims that he was 100% insulated from this money and he never discussed any foreign matters with his son who also traveled with him on the VP Air Force planes.
2) But at the same time, to target Hunter Biden, according to Democrats, is the same thing for political purposes as targeting Joe Biden himself. It is Joe running for the Presidency, not Hunter, but apparently they are one and the same for the purposes of impeaching Trump for election interference.
So is Hunter so tied at the hip of his father Joe that he cannot be investigated without it also influencing his fathers election, or are they separate enough that billions of dollars given to Hunter has absolutely ZERO IMPACT on his father Joe?
Which is it?
As long as this 8,000 pound Gigantic Gorilla sits dead square in the middle of the room, the Democrats are not going to get anywhere except to continue burning to the ground their own most winnable nominee - Joe Biden.
They are claiming that it is a violation of our Constitution for American officials to 'dig up dirt' on their political opponents, even if it is actually enforcing actual law and that official is a law enforcement officer. 'Digging up dirt' would presumably cover things like the research done with the Steel Dossier that Clinton and the DNC paid for, and that would also therefore be a violation of the Constitution too, but they don't want that investigated.
So I guess they think it is unconstitutional only if a Democrat is targeted for said investigation no matter how many billions and billions of US dollars the politician running for office gets paid. No matter what the details, if a Democrat is running for office it is unconstitutional for them to be investigated by anyone.
But here is the Biden Paradox.
1) It was Hunter Biden that was actually given all these billions, not Joe Biden himself, who claims that he was 100% insulated from this money and he never discussed any foreign matters with his son who also traveled with him on the VP Air Force planes.
2) But at the same time, to target Hunter Biden, according to Democrats, is the same thing for political purposes as targeting Joe Biden himself. It is Joe running for the Presidency, not Hunter, but apparently they are one and the same for the purposes of impeaching Trump for election interference.
So is Hunter so tied at the hip of his father Joe that he cannot be investigated without it also influencing his fathers election, or are they separate enough that billions of dollars given to Hunter has absolutely ZERO IMPACT on his father Joe?
Which is it?
As long as this 8,000 pound Gigantic Gorilla sits dead square in the middle of the room, the Democrats are not going to get anywhere except to continue burning to the ground their own most winnable nominee - Joe Biden.
Last edited:
