Democrats about to chose a Muslim as chairman of their party

[tigerred59]

Keith Ellison.

Apparently they didn't get the message this Nov. 8 that this country does not belong to the radicals, antisemites, socialists, communists, anarchists, and assorted anti American assholes.

I look forward to even more painful Democrat losses in that case.

Dude don't you know by now that the game of political correctness is fuckin over....I personally hope they name a crack laced transvestite progressive just released from prison for raping little boys, while video taping it to you.....and still its nothing compared to Donald fuckin Tweet!!

Skip the meds today, did you?

If you stop stealing them from me, I'd take em

 

[Roudy]

Democrats have got to be the dumbest organisms on this planet with the lowest learning curve in human history. LOL

KEITH ELLISON=> THE PERFECT PICK FOR DNC CHAIR - Jew-Hating Radical Who Detests Israel

Bernie Sanders and Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren want Ellison to lead the party.

Who is Keith Ellison?…
In 1997, when Joanne Jackson, executive director of the Minneapolis Initiative Against Racism (MIAR), allegedly said that, “Jews are among the most racist white people”, Ellison, using his religious name Mohammed, read a statement supporting her on behalf of the The Minneapolis-St. Paul Study Group of the Nations of Islam: “[We] stand by Ms. Jackson. We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to her, and by her right to express her view without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite.”

The media and the left are suddenly interested in anti-Semitism again. As usual the “interest” is purely politically convenient. The best evidence of that is the coronation of Keith X. Ellison.

Ellison’s anti-Semitic past continues to be covered up by the media because it’s certainly very revealing that a top progressive had Nation of Islam ties. It’s also very revealing that no one will talk about it.

As a third-year student at the University of Minnesota Law School in 1989-90, he wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name “Keith Hakim.” In the first, Ellison refers to “Minister Louis Farrakhan,” defends Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and speaks in the voice of a Nation of Islam advocate. In the second, “Hakim” demands reparations for slavery and throws in a demand for an optional separate homeland for American blacks. In February 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at the law school on the subject “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?” Jewish law students met personally with Ellison and appealed to him not to sponsor the speech at the law school; he rejected their appeal, and, as anticipated, Ture gave a notoriously anti-Semitic speech.

n a November 6, 1995, column for the Minneapolis periodical Insight News, Ellison wrote under the name “Keith X Ellison.” He condemned a Star Tribune editorial cartoon that was critical of Farrakhan as a role model for blacks because of his anti-Semitism. Ellison argued to the contrary.

Then, in February 1997, Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name “Muhammad.” He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said: “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction.”

Ellison has a long history of involvement with Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.
He’s a perfect choice to lead the DNC.

you really like to fest on the goyims anus

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

^^^^^^
Yup....

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

You aughtta know retard!!

For best results, open mouth wide please....

 

[Roudy]

Keith Ellison.

Apparently they didn't get the message this Nov. 8 that this country does not belong to the radicals, antisemites, socialists, communists, anarchists, and assorted anti American assholes.

I look forward to even more painful Democrat losses in that case.

Dude don't you know by now that the game of political correctness is fuckin over....I personally hope they name a crack laced transvestite progressive just released from prison for raping little boys, while video taping it to you.....and still its nothing compared to Donald fuckin Tweet!!

Skip the meds today, did you?

If you stop stealing them from me, I'd take em

What was it you said? You have your name written on the door of a white padded room?

 

[Pogo]

Wasn't aware this mindless thread had come back but looking over the last page:


------ not a single one of these explains why there should be a religious test to chair an organization.

Not one. Not even a hint.

Also no sign of any answer on the burning question of what religion Prince Reebus practices. I understand it's like vitally important shit.

Yeah....mindless because having a Racist, Black Islamic prick running the Democratic Party is perfectly acceptable.
Kind of like David Duke running the GOP.....right?

Once AGAIN, I have no idea, or care, what David Duke's religion is.
But if you think it's a factor ----- give us all a laugh and explain why.


I think my favorite gaffe from all those is this line:

he took office swearing on a book that puts allah's law above American law.

Got that? Muhammad, back in the 7th century, anticipated the Constitution of a country that would not exist for over a thousand years, on a continent nobody around there knew existed.

Not even a decent deflection....
I think the point was both Ellison and Duke are racists and shouldn't be in charge of any part of our government. I think both David Duke and Keith Ellison would be happy to fire up the ovens and throw Jews in the fire.....along with anyone else that gets in their way.

That isn't the topic though. The title plainly moans that "Democrats are about to choose a Muslim". That's a specific reference to RELIGION. Which is why I demanded to know, back when this thread started, why his religion matters. However long ago that was, I never got an answer.

That's the kind of question I lay out there --- ones that can't be answered.

Not "Democrats are about to choose a racist" or "Democrats are about to choose a black man" or "Democrats are about to choose a Capricornian" --- a Muslim.

Who da "deflector" now, beeeeeyatch?

Yup, that's what the title says, Democrats are about to chose a Muslim, in an environment where the Democratic Party is being perceived as Islam apologist, Christian bashing, can't say "Islamic terrorist", and home to the Muslim Brotherhood. Not only they're electing a Muslim, but a radical, anti American, anti semtic, black supremacist one to boot.

".... in an environment where internet tough-guy religious bigots stare intently up their own anal cavity and think they see something profound, and proceed to spend eternity locked in their own shitpile of circular reasoning".

All fixed.

Still no answer. Nor is one possible

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Democrats have got to be the dumbest organisms on this planet with the lowest learning curve in human history. LOL

KEITH ELLISON=> THE PERFECT PICK FOR DNC CHAIR - Jew-Hating Radical Who Detests Israel

Bernie Sanders and Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren want Ellison to lead the party.

Who is Keith Ellison?…
In 1997, when Joanne Jackson, executive director of the Minneapolis Initiative Against Racism (MIAR), allegedly said that, “Jews are among the most racist white people”, Ellison, using his religious name Mohammed, read a statement supporting her on behalf of the The Minneapolis-St. Paul Study Group of the Nations of Islam: “[We] stand by Ms. Jackson. We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to her, and by her right to express her view without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite.”

The media and the left are suddenly interested in anti-Semitism again. As usual the “interest” is purely politically convenient. The best evidence of that is the coronation of Keith X. Ellison.

Ellison’s anti-Semitic past continues to be covered up by the media because it’s certainly very revealing that a top progressive had Nation of Islam ties. It’s also very revealing that no one will talk about it.

As a third-year student at the University of Minnesota Law School in 1989-90, he wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name “Keith Hakim.” In the first, Ellison refers to “Minister Louis Farrakhan,” defends Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and speaks in the voice of a Nation of Islam advocate. In the second, “Hakim” demands reparations for slavery and throws in a demand for an optional separate homeland for American blacks. In February 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at the law school on the subject “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?” Jewish law students met personally with Ellison and appealed to him not to sponsor the speech at the law school; he rejected their appeal, and, as anticipated, Ture gave a notoriously anti-Semitic speech.

n a November 6, 1995, column for the Minneapolis periodical Insight News, Ellison wrote under the name “Keith X Ellison.” He condemned a Star Tribune editorial cartoon that was critical of Farrakhan as a role model for blacks because of his anti-Semitism. Ellison argued to the contrary.

Then, in February 1997, Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name “Muhammad.” He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said: “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction.”

Ellison has a long history of involvement with Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.
He’s a perfect choice to lead the DNC.

you really like to fest on the goyims anus

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

 

[Johann]

I think that's great. Muslims have a history of 'workplace violence'.

 

[Roudy]

Yeah....mindless because having a Racist, Black Islamic prick running the Democratic Party is perfectly acceptable.
Kind of like David Duke running the GOP.....right?

Once AGAIN, I have no idea, or care, what David Duke's religion is.
But if you think it's a factor ----- give us all a laugh and explain why.


I think my favorite gaffe from all those is this line:

he took office swearing on a book that puts allah's law above American law.

Got that? Muhammad, back in the 7th century, anticipated the Constitution of a country that would not exist for over a thousand years, on a continent nobody around there knew existed.

Not even a decent deflection....
I think the point was both Ellison and Duke are racists and shouldn't be in charge of any part of our government. I think both David Duke and Keith Ellison would be happy to fire up the ovens and throw Jews in the fire.....along with anyone else that gets in their way.

That isn't the topic though. The title plainly moans that "Democrats are about to choose a Muslim". That's a specific reference to RELIGION. Which is why I demanded to know, back when this thread started, why his religion matters. However long ago that was, I never got an answer.

That's the kind of question I lay out there --- ones that can't be answered.

Not "Democrats are about to choose a racist" or "Democrats are about to choose a black man" or "Democrats are about to choose a Capricornian" --- a Muslim.

Who da "deflector" now, beeeeeyatch?

Yup, that's what the title says, Democrats are about to chose a Muslim, in an environment where the Democratic Party is being perceived as Islam apologist, Christian bashing, can't say "Islamic terrorist", and home to the Muslim Brotherhood. Not only they're electing a Muslim, but a radical, anti American, anti semtic, black supremacist one to boot.

".... in an environment where internet tough-guy religious bigots stare intently up their own anal cavity and think they see something profound, and proceed to spend eternity locked in their own shitpile of circular reasoning".

All fixed.

Still no answer. Nor is one possible

Did you just get done talking to yourself? Good, now go wipe the saliva from your mouth over the thought of Democrats voting for a black supremacist, anti Semitic, anti American Islamist as their leader. I pray they go through with this suicidal move.

 

[Roudy]

Democrats have got to be the dumbest organisms on this planet with the lowest learning curve in human history. LOL

KEITH ELLISON=> THE PERFECT PICK FOR DNC CHAIR - Jew-Hating Radical Who Detests Israel

Bernie Sanders and Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren want Ellison to lead the party.

Who is Keith Ellison?…
In 1997, when Joanne Jackson, executive director of the Minneapolis Initiative Against Racism (MIAR), allegedly said that, “Jews are among the most racist white people”, Ellison, using his religious name Mohammed, read a statement supporting her on behalf of the The Minneapolis-St. Paul Study Group of the Nations of Islam: “[We] stand by Ms. Jackson. We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to her, and by her right to express her view without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite.”

The media and the left are suddenly interested in anti-Semitism again. As usual the “interest” is purely politically convenient. The best evidence of that is the coronation of Keith X. Ellison.

Ellison’s anti-Semitic past continues to be covered up by the media because it’s certainly very revealing that a top progressive had Nation of Islam ties. It’s also very revealing that no one will talk about it.

As a third-year student at the University of Minnesota Law School in 1989-90, he wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name “Keith Hakim.” In the first, Ellison refers to “Minister Louis Farrakhan,” defends Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and speaks in the voice of a Nation of Islam advocate. In the second, “Hakim” demands reparations for slavery and throws in a demand for an optional separate homeland for American blacks. In February 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at the law school on the subject “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?” Jewish law students met personally with Ellison and appealed to him not to sponsor the speech at the law school; he rejected their appeal, and, as anticipated, Ture gave a notoriously anti-Semitic speech.

n a November 6, 1995, column for the Minneapolis periodical Insight News, Ellison wrote under the name “Keith X Ellison.” He condemned a Star Tribune editorial cartoon that was critical of Farrakhan as a role model for blacks because of his anti-Semitism. Ellison argued to the contrary.

Then, in February 1997, Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name “Muhammad.” He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said: “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction.”

Ellison has a long history of involvement with Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.
He’s a perfect choice to lead the DNC.

you really like to fest on the goyims anus

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

 

[2aguy]

Putting this guy in charge of the DNC is at the top of my political Christmas list.....

 

[Pogo]

Democrats have got to be the dumbest organisms on this planet with the lowest learning curve in human history. LOL

KEITH ELLISON=> THE PERFECT PICK FOR DNC CHAIR - Jew-Hating Radical Who Detests Israel

Bernie Sanders and Fake Indian Elizabeth Warren want Ellison to lead the party.

Who is Keith Ellison?…
In 1997, when Joanne Jackson, executive director of the Minneapolis Initiative Against Racism (MIAR), allegedly said that, “Jews are among the most racist white people”, Ellison, using his religious name Mohammed, read a statement supporting her on behalf of the The Minneapolis-St. Paul Study Group of the Nations of Islam: “[We] stand by Ms. Jackson. We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to her, and by her right to express her view without sanction. Here is why we support Ms. Jackson: She is correct about Minister Farrakhan. He is not a racist. He is also not an anti-Semite.”

The media and the left are suddenly interested in anti-Semitism again. As usual the “interest” is purely politically convenient. The best evidence of that is the coronation of Keith X. Ellison.

Ellison’s anti-Semitic past continues to be covered up by the media because it’s certainly very revealing that a top progressive had Nation of Islam ties. It’s also very revealing that no one will talk about it.

As a third-year student at the University of Minnesota Law School in 1989-90, he wrote two columns for the Minnesota Daily under the name “Keith Hakim.” In the first, Ellison refers to “Minister Louis Farrakhan,” defends Nation of Islam spokesman Khalid Abdul Muhammad, and speaks in the voice of a Nation of Islam advocate. In the second, “Hakim” demands reparations for slavery and throws in a demand for an optional separate homeland for American blacks. In February 1990, Ellison participated in sponsoring Kwame Ture (Stokely Carmichael) to speak at the law school on the subject “Zionism: Imperialism, White Supremacy or Both?” Jewish law students met personally with Ellison and appealed to him not to sponsor the speech at the law school; he rejected their appeal, and, as anticipated, Ture gave a notoriously anti-Semitic speech.

n a November 6, 1995, column for the Minneapolis periodical Insight News, Ellison wrote under the name “Keith X Ellison.” He condemned a Star Tribune editorial cartoon that was critical of Farrakhan as a role model for blacks because of his anti-Semitism. Ellison argued to the contrary.

Then, in February 1997, Ellison appeared as a local spokesman for the Nation of Islam with the last name “Muhammad.” He spoke at a public hearing in connection with a controversy involving Joanne Jackson of the Minnesota Initiative Against Racism (MIAR). Jackson was alleged to have said, “Jews are among the most racist white people I know.” Jackson denied making the statement or insisted that it had been taken out of context. Ellison appeared before the MIAR on behalf of the Nation of Islam in defense of Jackson’s alleged statement. According to the Star Tribune and the full text of the statement published in the Minneapolis Spokesman-Recorder, Ellison said: “We stand by the truth contained in the remarks attributed to [Ms. Jackson], and by her right to express her views without sanction.”

Ellison has a long history of involvement with Farrakhan’s Nation of Islam.
He’s a perfect choice to lead the DNC.

you really like to fest on the goyims anus

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

 

[Roudy]

you really like to fest on the goyims anus

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

What drugs are you on, again?

Try to stay on topic, dope. We're talking about the Democrats about to elect a radical Muslim black supremacist antisemite as their leader. No wonder, they have people you as members of their party.

 

[Pogo]

Said the guy who sees nothing wrong with having an antisemitic, black supremacist, radical Islamist asshole like Keith Ellison as leader of his party.

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

What drugs are you on, again?

Try to stay on topic, dope. We're talking about the Democrats about to elect a radical Muslim black supremacist antisemite as their leader. No wonder, they have people you as members of their party.

"Drugs"? Dood. I took a whole American history book, crushed it up and snorted it.

I'm well aware what the topic is: "Democrats about to choose a (insert religion here) as (insert position).

Heard the same thing in 1960 with Kennedy. Thought it was the most bizzaro thing I'd ever heard.
Happened back in the '20s too when Democrats were about to choose a (insert religion here) as Presidential candidate.

That's why I came in here back when this bigot tree thread first got planted to call it out for what it is.
Because I've seen it before and I know how it ends.

For all you whiny-ass bigots:

 

[Roudy]

You whores, you redneck racist, you low life fuck head, who ain't got a problem with Putin, Trump and the Nazi party he's putting in his cabinet got issues with a muslim? GET THE FUCK OUTTA HERE AND WACK OFF!!

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

What drugs are you on, again?

Try to stay on topic, dope. We're talking about the Democrats about to elect a radical Muslim black supremacist antisemite as their leader. No wonder, they have people you as members of their party.

"Drugs"? Dood. I took a whole American history book, crushed it up and snorted it.

I'm well aware what the topic is: "Democrats about to choose a (insert religion here) as (insert position).

Heard the same thing in 1960 with Kennedy. Thought it was the most bizzaro thing I'd ever heard.
Happened back in the '20s too when Democrats were about to choose a (insert religion here) as Presidential candidate.

That's why I came in here back when this bigot tree thread first got planted to call it out for what it is.
Because I've seen it before and I know how it ends.

For all you whiny-ass bigots:

more jibberish and false comparisons by a whiney leftist hack having problems with the results of the election. The civilized world wasn't under attack by those practicing Kennedy's religion, dumbass, nor did Kennedy have a reputation as a radical anti American, antisemite, or a racist.

 

[Pogo]

who ain't got a problem with Putin,

Hillary doesn't. Neither does Obama.

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

What drugs are you on, again?

Try to stay on topic, dope. We're talking about the Democrats about to elect a radical Muslim black supremacist antisemite as their leader. No wonder, they have people you as members of their party.

"Drugs"? Dood. I took a whole American history book, crushed it up and snorted it.

I'm well aware what the topic is: "Democrats about to choose a (insert religion here) as (insert position).

Heard the same thing in 1960 with Kennedy. Thought it was the most bizzaro thing I'd ever heard.
Happened back in the '20s too when Democrats were about to choose a (insert religion here) as Presidential candidate.

That's why I came in here back when this bigot tree thread first got planted to call it out for what it is.
Because I've seen it before and I know how it ends.

For all you whiny-ass bigots:

more jibberish and false comparisons by a whiney leftist hack having problems with the results of the election. The civilized world wasn't under attack by those practicing Kennedy's religion, dumbass, nor did Kennedy have a reputation as a radical anti American, antisemite, or a racist.

Of course not. We all knew that. But y'all bigots certainly claimed he did.
That's what your species does. You can't help yourselves. It's brain damage. There's nothing you can do about it.

 

[Roudy]

It's funny, Hillary is the same person that promoted closer ties with Russia and a reset button in our relations, and in a gotcha moment in 2012, Obama whispered in Putin's ear "more flexibility" once he's elected president. Now the hypocritical Democratic dirtbags are all horrified over the incoming president trying to put together Obama's broken foreign policy in order to create some stability in the world.

"Hillary" --- what's her religion again?
"Obama" ----- what's his religion again?
"Russia" ------ what's its religion again?
"Putin" ----- what's his religion again?
"The world" ---- --- what's its religion again?
Poster --- --- what's your religion again?

Get on that willya. This is like really important to the low hanging fruits of the bigot tree.

What drugs are you on, again?

Try to stay on topic, dope. We're talking about the Democrats about to elect a radical Muslim black supremacist antisemite as their leader. No wonder, they have people you as members of their party.

"Drugs"? Dood. I took a whole American history book, crushed it up and snorted it.

I'm well aware what the topic is: "Democrats about to choose a (insert religion here) as (insert position).

Heard the same thing in 1960 with Kennedy. Thought it was the most bizzaro thing I'd ever heard.
Happened back in the '20s too when Democrats were about to choose a (insert religion here) as Presidential candidate.

That's why I came in here back when this bigot tree thread first got planted to call it out for what it is.
Because I've seen it before and I know how it ends.

For all you whiny-ass bigots:

more jibberish and false comparisons by a whiney leftist hack having problems with the results of the election. The civilized world wasn't under attack by those practicing Kennedy's religion, dumbass, nor did Kennedy have a reputation as a radical anti American, antisemite, or a racist.

Of course not. We all knew that. But y'all bigots certainly claimed he did.
That's what your species does. You can't help yourselves. It's brain damage. There's nothing you can do about it.

I don't recall Catholic terrorists running around killing, terrorising, and committing genocide on non Catholics, in the name of Jesus or Christianity, or creating Catholic Kingdoms aka "Caliphates" during Kennedy's time, do you?

Maybe you Democrats should rethink nominating a bigot, antisemite, black supremacist, anti American Islamist radical as your leader? Or perhaps you're living in your leftist delusional bubble and have an extremely low learning curve.