- Feb 22, 2017
- 108,063
- 37,356
- 2,290
They'll say anything to avoid confronting the truth.
Why does your programing put so many extra spaces between the quote and the reply?
Seems that would be an easy thing to fix
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They'll say anything to avoid confronting the truth.
But when Barr said there was no widespread voter fraud and Trump was basically full of shit...that was just Barr being a Communist Deep State plant controlled by Biden?
Does it hurt to have to be so cognitively dissonant??
Why does your programing put so many extra spaces between the quote and the reply?
Seems that would be an easy thing to fix
And yet another attempt to avoid the facts posted.
You're quite the coward, aren't you.
You wrote this:William "The Fixer" Barr. was brought in to cast shade on Mueller's report.
"As we stated in our meeting of March 5 and reiterated to the Department early in the afternoon of March 24, the introductions and executive summaries of our two-volume report accurately summarize this Office's work and conclusions. The summary letter the Department sent to Congress and released to the public late in the afternoon of March 24 did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions. We communicated that concern to the Department on the morning of March 25. There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations."
READ: Mueller's Letter Expressing Concern About Barr's Summary Of His Report
On March 27, the special counsel told Attorney General William Barr that his public description "did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance of this Office's work and conclusions."www.npr.org
Why can you not answer the question?
Why are you afraid to deal with the post that brought you crawling into the thread???
1. Recently, I've seen posts by Democrat servants who still claim that Mueller found collusion by Trump et al.
No matter how often this is disproven, they continue to claim so.
"The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election," Barr wrote in a letter to leaders of the House and Senate judiciary committees on Sunday afternoon.That was despite "multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign," he wrote. Mueller Report Doesn't Find Russian Collusion, But Can't 'Exonerate' On Obstruction
“ The report further explains that a primary consideration for the Special Counsel's investigation was whether any Americans – including individuals associated with the Trump campaign – joined the Russian conspiracies to influence the election, which would be a federal crime. The Special Counsel's investigation did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election. As the report states: “[T]he investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.” As noted above, the Special Counsel did not find that any U.S. person or Trump campaign official or associate conspired or knowingly coordinated with the IRA in its efforts, although the Special Counsel brought criminal charges against a number of Russian nationals and entities in connection with these activities.” Read Attorney General William Barr’s Summary of the Mueller Report (Published 2019)
“Mueller's investigation found no evidence of illegal or criminal coordination between Trump or the Trump campaign and Russia in 2016.” Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user created'
“The Washington Post corrects, removes parts of two stories regarding the Steele dossier…Other stories that made the same assertion were corrected as well.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...c9b770-43d5-11ec-a88e-2aa4632af69b_story.html
2. "Bill Barr: Mueller 'Made Some Very Serious Errors'
"He goes out and hires partisan Democrats to make up his investigative team, which means half the country is going to be suspicious from the very beginning. That defeated the whole purpose of naming him. I think it was pretty evident within a few months of his taking the position that there had been no collusion.
"But instead of stopping it at that point and letting the country move on, he took two instances that clearly were not obstruction and which even his final report doesn't try to argue were obstruction."
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/barr-podcast-mueller/2022/08/26/id/1084740/
3. Democrat slaves bear a marked resemblence to Hiroo Onoda, the Japanese soldier who hid out and contiued to fight the war that Japan had lost, for over 30 years.
Only thing you can put in its place is Trump's dic in yo mouth you goofy ditz
It was a simple question, why can your programmers not fix your spacing issues?
I make the rules.
No stinky one, I wrote this "William "The Fixer" Barr. was brought in to cast shade on Mueller's report." and brought Mueller's response to "The Fixers" interjection to the table.You wrote this:
No stinky one, I wrote this "William "The Fixer" Barr. was brought in to cast shade on Mueller's report." and brought Mueller's response to "The Fixers" interjection to the table.
But your response was not unexpected, because, well, you.
Projection post #82736263525352532