Democrats Change 181 Year-Old Rule To Allow Ilhan Omar To Wear Hijab In The House

[bodecea]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

Fear...he's afraid of a young woman in a hijab.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion


Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

They changing the rules to promote one religion over another .

 

[Faun]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

The rightwing echo chamber is full of such noise.

 

[martybegan]

Or the person can just show their face.

A head scarf is one thing, a full face covering is something else.

How does that prevent her from serving in Congress other than it freaks you out?

again, how do we know who it is?

Again, head covering fine, face covering, no.

Should we allow congress to all show up in guy fawkes masks? Government representatives should be able to be identified.

People call me on the phone and I can tell who they are by their voice

But if Republicans want to be a dick about it, you can give her an access code or fingerprint or retinal scanner

So many women impersonate women in burkas

Or again, show your face. it's not a hard thing to ask.

I agree with the "show your face" part. Is that a problem with this new Congresswoman?

Not at all, and that's why I am fine with the rule being removed.

The face covering is a theoretical question for the next, possibly more devout, muslim woman representative.

Or the current one, is she has a "closer to Allah" moment and decides to go full burkha.

 

[Faun]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion


Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

LOLOL

Look at how rightarded these nuts here are. This one is actually claiming that by letting a Muslim woman wear a hijab in the House gallery, Islam would be established as the nation’s religion.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

The rightwing echo chamber is full of such nonsense.

This is a feild day for me to point out the hypocrisy on the left..I could care less..

She is flaunting the law..

 

[Wyatt earp]

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion


Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

LOLOL

Look at how rightarded these nuts here are. This one is actually claiming that by letting a Muslim woman wear a hijab in the House gallery, Islam would be established as the nation’s religion.

And the left is Letting her..


.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion

Yes. This is about the promotion of Islam by the left. And we must remember this promotion, by itself isn't exceptional.
It's all the other little concessions made to Muslims...Islam taught in public schools, special dietary requirements, prayer rooms, wash rooms, the call to prayer broadcast over loudspeakers, ect.

All special considerations no other religion enjoys and all backed by leftists.

 

[Lysistrata]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

Fear...he's afraid of a young woman in a hijab.

There appears to some smoke-filled back room where a bunch of weirdos make up stuff to disseminate online to the foolish.

Not only is calling someone a "dothead" totally disgusting and repulsive, it also displays the ignorance of the people responsible for it. Wearing a dot on the forehead is a Hindu custom. This freshman rep is a Muslim.

I find it interesting that among several Ethiopians living in my neighborhood, some of the older women have the Ethiopian Cross tattooed on their foreheads.

I guess that I'm supposed to quake in fear as the woman in a hijab bags my groceries at the Giant.

 

[Faun]

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

The rightwing echo chamber is full of such nonsense.

This is a feild day for me to point out the hypocrisy on the left..I could care less..

She is flaunting the law..

And yet, you’ve failed miserably to demonstrate any hypocrisy.

And what law is she flaunting?

 

[deanrd]

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

The rightwing echo chamber is full of such nonsense.

This is a feild day for me to point out the hypocrisy on the left..I could care less..

She is flaunting the law..

What law?

 

[Faun]

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion


Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

LOLOL

Look at how rightarded these nuts here are. This one is actually claiming that by letting a Muslim woman wear a hijab in the House gallery, Islam would be established as the nation’s religion.

And the left is Letting her..


.

Well no, this does not actually establish Islam as the nation’s religion. Sadly, you’re merely suffering another one of your ”episodes.”

 

[bodecea]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion


Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

"Girl"? Are you not aware that one must be at least 25 years old to be a member of the House of Representatives. And no, this WOMAN isn't promoting a religion any more than any other member wearing a cross necklace or a yamulke.

 

[deanrd]

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???

Fear...he's afraid of a young woman in a hijab.

There appears to some smoke-filled back room where a bunch of weirdos make up stuff to disseminate online to the foolish.

Not only is calling someone a "dothead" totally disgusting and repulsive, it also displays the ignorance of the people responsible for it. Wearing a dot on the forehead is a Hindu custom. This freshman rep is a Muslim.

I find it interesting that among several Ethiopians living in my neighborhood, some of the older women have the Ethiopian Cross tattooed on their foreheads.

I guess that I'm supposed to quake in fear as the woman in a hijab bags my groceries at the Giant.

Republicans are racist.

They don't know much about different religions because they simply don't know much about anything at all.

These are people who believe the earth is thousands of years old and we were shimmered into being from dirt. If you believe that, you can be brainwashed into believing anything.

Republicans prove that point.

 

[Faun]

It's huge and this girl is going down she is promoting a religion

Yes. This is about the promotion of Islam by the left. And we must remember this promotion, by itself isn't exceptional.
It's all the other little concessions made to Muslims...Islam taught in public schools, special dietary requirements, prayer rooms, wash rooms, the call to prayer broadcast over loudspeakers, ect.

All special considerations no other religion enjoys and all backed by leftists.

How does this promote Islam? It allows men to wear yarmulkes. So according to you, Judaism and Islam are being promoted?

And if that’s a concern of the right, why have y’all been silent all these years when the Senate allows it?

And can you show how allowing men to wear yarmulkes in the Senate has promoted Judaism?

 

[Cosmos]

The hijab is not religious headwear. It is a symbol of hatred against Western culture. It should not be allowed in Congress. Nor should Islam be allowed anywhere in the Western Hemisphere.

 

[Montrovant]

Read the first amendment and get back to me

How is allowing a head scarf showing preference?

It's giving an exemption to a religion that none other has.
I thought that was obvious. "Okay, we'll let you ignore the rules everyone else must follow".
What is it about the word preference that you don't understand?

Why do you want to be such a prick a about a woman exercising her religion?

Why do you want to be a prick about respecting the rules of congress that have stood for nearly two hundred years?

Unless it specifies this only applies to hijabs, how is it "giving an exemption to a religion that none other has"? For example, as someone else brought up, wouldn't the rule change allow Jewish representatives to wear a yarmulke? Would it allow a Sikh to wear a turban?

 

[rightwinger]

Read the first amendment and get back to me

How is allowing a head scarf showing preference?

It's giving an exemption to a religion that none other has.
I thought that was obvious. "Okay, we'll let you ignore the rules everyone else must follow".
What is it about the word preference that you don't understand?

Why do you want to be such a prick a about a woman exercising her religion?

Why do you want to be a prick about respecting the rules of congress that have stood for nearly two hundred years?

Because the rules were written for men wearing headgear at a time they never envisioned s Muslim woman being elected

Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof

What is not clear?

 

[Faun]

The hijab is not religious headwear. It is a symbol of hatred against Western culture. It should not be allowed in Congress. Nor should Islam be allowed anywhere in the Western Hemisphere.

They stem from scripture in the Qur’an and is a symbol of modesty and faith.

And head coverings for religious belief has been allowed in the Senate. You rightards are only outraged now because your marionette strings are being tugged.