Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?Minnesota has elected some strange characters.
Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...
”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
"inside a government building"....yes. Put it on church or private property.This is the same fucking thing..
Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)
Court finds that a nativity scene displayed inside a government building violates the Establishment Clause
No she's not. As long as that cult is legal, she is free to exercise her "religion" too. This is what happens when you let Democrats flood the country with these Turd Worlderers.Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?Minnesota has elected some strange characters.
Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...
She is tearing down the establishment clause..
I know ghost readers lawyers read .
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congres
Dumbfuck, the Senate already allows this and they’re a part of Congress.I still don’t see where the left has prevented students in public schools from wearing such head garments. What about religious symbols on jewelry, e.g., crosses, Jewish stars, etc.... does the left fight to keep those out of public schools or from Congress?What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?I am going to have a field day with this one..
You tards want separation of church and state and allow this?
.
Once again these people will be on the news, saying assnine things ..
What happened to separation of church and state..the left wants dot head bullshit instead of Christianity..
.
I’m not seeing the hypocrisy you’re howling over.
Don't give me any of that bullshit..
The left is all about tearing down crosses and the ten commandments..
Now they want to change the laws to allow religious head garb in Congress .
God damn you guys are fucking assholes.
”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
Because they hate Muslims.Read the first amendment and get back to meDon't be such a disingenuous sophist! A preference for one religion over all others is being shown here. It's everythingCongress is making no laws regarding establishment of religion
They are only allowing free exercise therein
the left claims to be against...except when it suits them.
The slope is slippery indeed.
How is allowing a head scarf showing preference?
Why do you want to be such a prick a about a woman exercising her religion?
How does wearing a head cover establish religion?”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
The establishment clause you stupid tard
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
This is the same fucking thing..
Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)
Court finds that a nativity scene displayed inside a government building violates the Establishment Clause
"inside a government building"....yes. Put it on church or private property.
So? So, in open society freedom of expression is guaranteed. In selected, voluntary, closed environments, certain concerns may be promoted and others not.That's why I'm not a fan of patriarchal religions....but we DO have the 1st Amendment, so......It isn't expressed the same way in the Bible as in the Koran, but the effect is pretty much the same; i.e., there is an inferiority in women compared to men as well as the differences between them.Is that what it meant when catholic women were covered in church? Asking for a friend.If such a symbol did not represent the oppression of women, perhaps it would be less unpalatable.
How does wearing a head cover establish religion?”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
The establishment clause you stupid tard
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?
How is this woman tearing down the Establishment Clause? Why is it that she frightens you so much by wearing her hijab? Do Jews with yalmukes frighten you as much?Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?Minnesota has elected some strange characters.
Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...
She is tearing down the establishment clause..
I know ghost readers lawyers read .
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congres
Many ways to tell who a person is without seeing a faceHow do we know who the person is if we can't see their face?
sorry, but that's just retarded.
If Republicans want to be such dicks about it they can invest in a fingerprint scanner at the entrance
Or the person can just show their face.
A head scarf is one thing, a full face covering is something else.
How does that prevent her from serving in Congress other than it freaks you out?
again, how do we know who it is?
Again, head covering fine, face covering, no.
Should we allow congress to all show up in guy fawkes masks? Government representatives should be able to be identified.
People call me on the phone and I can tell who they are by their voice
But if Republicans want to be a dick about it, you can give her an access code or fingerprint or retinal scanner
So many women impersonate women in burkas
Why don’t you answer my questions?How does wearing a head cover establish religion?”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
The establishment clause you stupid tard
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?
Why does she need to wear it?
.
For the same reason that Orthodox Jews will wear a yamulke.How does wearing a head cover establish religion?”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
The establishment clause you stupid tard
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?
Why does she need to wear it?
.
I agree with the "show your face" part. Is that a problem with this new Congresswoman?Many ways to tell who a person is without seeing a face
If Republicans want to be such dicks about it they can invest in a fingerprint scanner at the entrance
Or the person can just show their face.
A head scarf is one thing, a full face covering is something else.
How does that prevent her from serving in Congress other than it freaks you out?
again, how do we know who it is?
Again, head covering fine, face covering, no.
Should we allow congress to all show up in guy fawkes masks? Government representatives should be able to be identified.
People call me on the phone and I can tell who they are by their voice
But if Republicans want to be a dick about it, you can give her an access code or fingerprint or retinal scanner
So many women impersonate women in burkas
Or again, show your face. it's not a hard thing to ask.
”The United States congress is not a public place.”The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?
Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.
How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?
But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...
...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;
United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL
... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?
The establishment clause you stupid tard
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW
- the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.
