Democrats Install Social Land Mines

[PoliticalChic]

As always, I am in awe of your superior cut an paste skills. I can only imagine the hours of training it took for you to reach that level of proficiency. Well done, my good and faithful servent.

My skills, intellect and education are superior to yours in evrey way imaginable.....and I prove it every day, don't I.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"San Francisco Promotes Illegal Drug Use, Overdose Deaths 'Skyrocket'"​

San Francisco Promotes Illegal Drug Use, Overdose Deaths 'Skyrocket'

pjmedia.com

And the dems didn't lose a single vote

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Halting the Use of Narcotics Through Effective Recovery Act."

Get it???

This is pretty creative work by the Republicans.....the HUNTER Act.

"Democratic Senator Joe Manchin launches bipartisan bill to stop taxpayer funds being used on 'crack' pipes and two Republican Reps. introduce the 'HUNTER' Act to ban federal spending on needles and drug paraphernalia​

• HHS denied that crack pipes were ever to be included in the 'safe smoking kits,' but Reps. Lauren Boebert and Dan Bishop said Biden got caught 'red-handed'"
• 

  Republicans introduce 'HUNTER' Act to ban funding of crack pipes

  Two Republicans appalled by a viral report alleging that the Biden administration was going to fund handing out crack pipes to drug addicts have introduced the 'HUNTER Act.

  www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[BULLDOG]

How stupid are you.

I follow the rules of the Constitution.

I'm an American, not a Fascist like you.

And try to be more articulate, and avoid the juvenile vulgarity that your sort defaults to when I skewer you.

Yes, we all pretty much follow the rules of the constitution, but you and your like minded idiots whine about it constantly.

 

[BULLDOG]

My skills, intellect and education are superior to yours in evrey way imaginable.....and I prove it every day, don't I.

Every, not evrey. Impressive intelect you got there.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, we all pretty much follow the rules of the constitution, but you and your like minded idiots whine about it constantly.

No, Fascist.....you do not follow the Constitution.


Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

 

[Mac-7]

The 'author' of the article doesn't give the reader the full name of the student. Doesn't give the reader the name of the school or district, or even the area of "Illinois" this fairy tale took place in.

Why dont you demand her picture and social media accounts so that the vast army of lib haters can attack her 24/7?

 

[22lcidw]

Yes, we all pretty much follow the rules of the constitution, but you and your like minded idiots whine about it constantly.

Many years ago, as one of your agendas, Prog started to promote the Constitution as a "living and breathing document". Which means it will end up like a Soviet version or blended into a Globalist one. But rights will be and are being curtailed.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Many years ago, as one of your agendas, Prog started to promote the Constitution as a "living and breathing document". Which means it will end up like a Soviet version or blended into a Globalist one. But rights will be and are being curtailed.

Justice Wm. Brennan, jr…1985 Georgetown speech supported the “transformative purpose” of the Constitution, in which he argued for an “aspiration to social justice, brotherhood, and human dignity…”

1. He claimed that General Meese’s vision was “little more than arrogance cloaked in humility” because we cannot discern how the Framers would apply moral-philosophic natural law to modern problems. Brennan denies any “static meaning,” but looks, instead, for ‘adaptability.”
2. To say that the genius of a constitution lies in the fluidity of its meaning is a little bit like saying that the genius of the brakes on your car is the way they can be used for acceleration. The whole point of having a constitution or a bill of rights is to memorialize and entrench fundamental rights so they can prevail in moments of passion.
3. The errors in Justice Brennan’s speech include the following:
   1. The idea of ‘adaptability’ is an affront to our idea of inter-generational lawmaking. Why start a business if one could not be certain that the Takings Clause would not remain in effect? Can we imagine an America without freedom of the press, or of speech, or the protections for private property? No…each generation remains bound by the rights its predecessor entrenched, as opposed to a doctrine in which each generation could bring its own meaning to the Constitution. San Diego Law School Professor Steven D. Smith points out that legal texts are simply scrawls if separated from the meaning given them by the Framers who wrote them.
   2. Brennan falls back on the idea that moderns should not be bound by “a world that is dead and gone.” Of course, there are lots of laws on the books today by folks dead and gone: Social Security laws, or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or the Sixteenth Amendment imposing an income tax, and all nine justices who participated in Roe v. Wade are now dead. Would Brennan suggest ignoring any of these….or does he simply wish to allow judges to pick and choose which laws written by dead people we are to be bound by? No, this ‘transformative’ view would simply allow justices to erase parts of the Constitution.
   3. While Justice Brennan advances the view that Originalists’ presumption is was “little more than arrogance cloaked in humility,” one should consider which view is truly arrogant: Brennan’s view is that those of us in the present generation are better able to judge than our benighted ancestors. Really? The American Constitution has survived for two centuries, the oldest and first such document in existence, and has inspired countless copies around the world. Through it we remain the freest and most fortunate people on earth.
   4. Finally, the ‘transformative’ view raises the level of generality of the Constitution in order to justify the left-wing outcomes that progressives want. Brennan identifies the Bill of Rights as protecting human dignity, then asks whether the death penalty, for example, is compatible with human dignity. A perfect example of sophistry, and lawyerly sleight of hand. The text of the Constitution does not speak vaguely of human dignity…but does specifically of freedom of speech, and of the press, about unreasonable searches and seizures, and about property not being taken capriciously. So, Brennan twists the ideas to produce what he deems good consequences. By that endeavor “the rule of law and not of men” becomes impossible.

 

[BULLDOG]

No, Fascist.....you do not follow the Constitution.


Under Democrat/Liberal LBJ, the law was passed that deprived pastors 2of their right of free speech.
What possible compelling government interest could this represent????

“The 1954 federal Johnson Amendment prohibits a pastor from talking about candidates from the pulpit in light of Scripture. Thus, based on what a pastor says about an election from the pulpit, the tax code allows the government to tax a church. Consider that in light of the Internal Revenue Service's increasingly vague regulations, and you have a recipe for the censorship of religion. The IRS, through those vague regulations, reserves for itself tremendous discretion and power to decide which churches to punish for violations of the Johnson Amendment and which not to punish.”
Why don't churches pay taxes?


Any reading of the first amendment will prove this to be unconstitutional.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

When you can show the scripture where Jesus endorsed any candidate to public office, We can discuss your silly thought.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When you can show the scripture where Jesus endorsed any candidate to public office, We can discuss your silly thought.

We don't 'discuss' anything. I simply post proof that you are lying scum.

 

[BULLDOG]

Many years ago, as one of your agendas, Prog started to promote the Constitution as a "living and breathing document". Which means it will end up like a Soviet version or blended into a Globalist one. But rights will be and are being curtailed.

Many years ago, as in almost immediately after it was signed. Who do you think added the amendments to the constitution?

 

[PoliticalChic]

TikTok drug user says Joe Biden gave him a crack pipe and shows what it looks like​

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Democrats' Obsession With Sex and Kids Gets Creepier by the Day​

...the 21st-century Democrats have gone completely bat you-know-what leftist crazy.

It’s easy to have a beer with someone you disagree with over tax policy; not so much with someone who wants to institutionalize talking about sex to 8-year-olds.

The brouhaha over Florida’s Parental Rights in Education bill showcases the Democrats at their worst. The Democrats and their flying monkeys in the mainstream media have gone all-in on lying about the bill, consistently referring to it as the “Don’t Say Gay” bill.

More than anything, the “don’t say gay” theater has revealed the utter depravity of those on the left who want to indoctrinate young children into an ideology that not only violates the religious beliefs of families and the rights of parents to discuss sensitive topics on their own terms but can also cause great harm to children.

It is both perplexing and disturbing that the Democrats are so bitterly opposed to a bill that merely wants to keep the sex talk away from first-graders."

The Morning Briefing: Democrats' Obsession With Sex and Kids Gets Creepier by the Day

pjmedia.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

That is a hell of a wall of largely irrelevant cut’n’paste that doesn’t show a single law banning individuals from praying.

Put yourself on ignore, you're hopeless

 

[badbob85037]

View attachment 598532

It will never happen, All they can do is bad mouth Trump showing their mental madness

 

[badbob85037]

Put yourself on ignore, you're hopeless

Biden has always been a racist piece of real stupid shit. Nothing more.

 

[kyzr]

Hey PC where ya been?

Please check out the "CommunistFront" minister posts on my polygamy thread.

You two could fill a book with your posts. Hope the debate happens...

 

[PoliticalChic]

It will never happen, All they can do is bad mouth Trump showing their mental madness

Have an exceptionally Happy New Year!

 

[Arresmillao]

It should be an expectation for Americans that the folks we elect to lead us support do so with the common good in mind.

Somehow, the Far Left has taken hold not just of the reins of government, but of the minds of voters who have become so debilitated that they can not longer see looming land mine terrain into which Democrats are leading all of us.



1.By now, the results of the Left’s attacks on morality and marriage, “a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle,” have produced poverty and crime, and millions of fatherless children.


2. And due to the normalizing of criminality, Democrat DAs, judges, prosecutors and legislators have given us no-bail-no-jail in all of our large cities. The huge surge of crime cannot be ignored nor denied.


3.By outlawing voluntary prayer, marginalizing religion, Democrats/Liberals have sent a message that the very opposite of the structure that guided civilization for so long, no longer matters.



4. Denying the existence of America itself, by refusing to have a border, has made our citizen’s lives precarious….

Border agents reported a 1,066% increase in fentanyl ...
https://www.cnn.com › 2022 › 01 › 08 › us › fentanyl-seized-south-texas-border-2021 › index.html
Jan 8, 2022An official of U.S. Customs and Border Protection is seen in El Paso, Texas. (CNN) US Customs and Border Protection reported a 1,066% increase in the amount of fentanyl seized in fiscal year 2021 ...
Jan 11, 2022 — In the shadow of COVID-19, our nation's drug-overdose epidemic is worsening. We need policymakers to take concrete actions in the new year ...




5. Where does the Constitution allow taxpayer funds to encourage addictive drug habits…as we see the Democrats doing today:

“Biden admin to fund crack pipe distribution for ‘racial equality’

The $30 million grant program, which closed applications Monday and will begin in May, will provide funds to nonprofits and local governments to help make drug use safer for addicts. Included in the grant, which is overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services, are funds for "smoking kits/supplies." A spokesman for the agency told the Washington Free Beacon that these kits will provide pipes for users to smoke crack cocaine, crystal methamphetamine, and "any illicit substance." SERIOUSLY: Biden admin to fund crack pipe distribution for ‘racial equality’

Democrats also installed dumbness in your brain...