Democrats Introduce Resolution To Trigger Vote On Expelling George Santos From Congress

[bripat9643]

Your make believe allegations about corruption don’t count. We are talking about actual corruption.

Nothing Dims allege count. It's all lies.

 

[Marener]

Anything the Democrats are currently trying to accuse Republicans of is what they are already guilty of themselves.
This is Marxism 101.

Prove it.

 

[Marener]

Nothing Dims allege count. It's all lies.

Ah. We found the one person that thinks George Santos is innocent.

Truly, there is no one dumber.

 

[bripat9643]

Ah. We found the one person that thinks George Santos is innocent.

Truly, there is no one dumber.

Innocent of what?

 

[mudwhistle]

Prove it.

It usually takes 1-4 years to prove it, but so far all of it has turned out to be true.

 

[Dagosa]

That's because they both rigged their elections.
They are so arrogant that they felt they didn't need to campaign.

So, you’re saying that the GOP was way too incompetent to prove anything, they had to resort to try to overthrow the election. So which is it ? The gop is incompetent or they’re losers.

 

[Marener]

Innocent of what?

Read the indictment, you moron. Are you living in a cave?

Rep. George Santos indicted. Read the charges here

Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., was indicted on federal charges that included money laundering, an unemployment fraud scheme, and lying to Congress.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Concerned American]

Anything the Democrats are currently trying to accuse Republicans of is what they are already guilty of themselves.
This is Marxism 101.

The classified document scandal is a fine example.

 

[Concerned American]

Ah. We found the one person that thinks George Santos is innocent.

Truly, there is no one dumber.

Until he is convicted of a crime, the decision lies with the voters of his district. Any attempts to remove him from congress over the voter's choice is nothing more than crass party politics and the democrats trying to leverage another seat. It definitely has nothing to do with trying to serve the American public.

 

[Dagosa]

That's because they both rigged their elections.
They are so arrogant that they felt they didn't need to campaign.

Funny, only the gop has been linked to organized voter fraud. It was an embarrassment to Bush when he commissioned a task force to get the data after his election. He whined about voter fraud too. This isn’t new, the gop has been doing fraud then whining about the other side for decades.

 

[Marener]

Until he is convicted of a crime, the decision lies with the voters of his district. Any attempts to remove him from congress over the voter's choice is nothing more than crass party politics and the democrats trying to leverage another seat. It definitely has nothing to do with trying to serve the American public.

The only reason any Republicans defend Santos is because they want to keep their crook around as long as possible to leverage his vote in the setting of their razor thin margin.

Santos’ election was based on known lies whether he’s convicted or not.

If Republicans thought they’d retain his seat, they’d have thrown him out already.

 

[Dagosa]

The classified document scandal is a fine example.

Why, because Trump lied and wouldn’t turn his ? Biden IS THE PRESIDENT. He’s not obligated to do anything. Trump is. He’s not president and must comply.

 

[Dagosa]

There are plenty from both sides of the isle who should not be working for US.
for the sake of party politics We CONTINUE to elect those we know are not working for US.
So its our own fault, We are served by to many of the self serving kind.

Not really. Only when we vote for a Republican who promptly works to promote a recession, the worse that can happen to the middle class.

 

[Concerned American]

The only reason any Republicans defend Santos

Who has defended him? It is not your or congress' right to remove him from office until he is convicted of a crime. That right lies with the voters of his district. If that is what they want to represent them, so be it. Fetterman is another fine example of someone who is clearly not fit to serve, Where is your indignation with him---or Biden for that matter.

 

[Marener]

Who has defended him? It is not your or congress' right to remove him from office until he is convicted of a crime. That right lies with the voters of his district. If that is what they want to represent them, so be it. Fetterman is another fine example of someone who is clearly not fit to serve, Where is your indignation with him---or Biden for that matter.

McCarthy defended him because McCarthy needs him.

 

[Concerned American]

McCarthy defended him because McCarthy needs him.

It isn't up to McCarthy. McCarthy doesn't live in Santos district and Santos hasn't been convicted of anything. You aren't very knowledgeable about who elects reps are you?

 

[Marener]

It isn't up to McCarthy. McCarthy doesn't live in Santos district and Santos hasn't been convicted of anything. You aren't very knowledgeable about who elects reps are you?

Article 1 section 5 gives Congress the authority to expel members based on a vote.

You aren't very knowledgeable about what the Constitution says.

 

[Dagosa]

Anything the Democrats are currently trying to accuse Republicans of is what they are already guilty of themselves.
This is Marxism 101.

Made up shit. But then, you’re the expert on Marxism.

 

[Dagosa]

Article 1 section 5 gives Congress the authority to expel members based on a vote.

You aren't very knowledgeable about what the Constitution says.

Why should he ? Santos is the perfect “character witness” for what the house majority has become under McCarthy.
Really, this is what the next step down from MTG looks like. It’s not pretty, but pretty revealing.

 

[Concerned American]

Article 1 section 5 gives Congress the authority to expel members based on a vote.

You aren't very knowledgeable about what the Constitution says.

LMAO, OK, whatever you say. Let the democrats waste more of your money on a move that has absolutely NO chance of going anywhere. Expulsion from congress can be accomplished with a 2/3 vote of the house. Good luck with that. To my previous point--what makes you think you have any right to remove anyone else's representative. Who is yours? Lets expel them over your vote. Typical democrat. You scream at the moon if someone asks you for voter ID but you think it is OK to overrule someone else's vote. Commie.