Democrats SUE to stop Arizona Senate from forensic audit of 2020 election

[jc456]

The audit/recount had done the job it was intended to do. It has found apparent irregularities.

Now it's up to Trump to convince his supporters that the irregularites were in favour of Biden.
The Cyber-Ninjas won't be making that proclamation, simplly because they would be leaving themselves open to prosecution if they did.

All that is left now is to wait to see if Trump still has enough support to take the findings to the next level.

Frankly, it appears to be a fizzle out attempt to revive Trump's popularity.

it did? post the link.

 

[Faun]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

 

[Faun]

The audit/recount had done the job it was intended to do. It has found apparent irregularities.

Now it's up to Trump to convince his supporters that the irregularites were in favour of Biden.
The Cyber-Ninjas won't be making that proclamation, simplly because they would be leaving themselves open to prosecution if they did.

All that is left now is to wait to see if Trump still has enough support to take the findings to the next level.

Frankly, it appears to be a fizzle out attempt to revive Trump's popularity.

Huh? What irregularities did it find??

 

[Faun]

likely a leak...i doubt the professionals at the auditors would intentionally give out bits and pieces before it’s done

The fake news media would. That's why they are denied entry.

it certainly was a smart move to limit access to the media in this highly sensitive area and protect leaks from media outlets that let’s say have a history of misinformation

Then why didn't they keep OANN out as well?

 

[Donald H]

The audit/recount had done the job it was intended to do. It has found apparent irregularities.

Now it's up to Trump to convince his supporters that the irregularities were in favour of Biden.
The Cyber-Ninjas won't be making that proclamation, simplly because they would be leaving themselves open to prosecution if they did.

All that is left now is to wait to see if Trump still has enough support to take the findings to the next level.

Frankly, it appears to be a fizzle out attempt to revive Trump's popularity.

Huh? What irregularities did it find??

You didn't understand what I said. Will you get it the second time around or are you just another stupid fkng American? The word 'apparent' is the clue.

 

[Faun]

The audit/recount had done the job it was intended to do. It has found apparent irregularities.

Now it's up to Trump to convince his supporters that the irregularities were in favour of Biden.
The Cyber-Ninjas won't be making that proclamation, simplly because they would be leaving themselves open to prosecution if they did.

All that is left now is to wait to see if Trump still has enough support to take the findings to the next level.

Frankly, it appears to be a fizzle out attempt to revive Trump's popularity.

Huh? What irregularities did it find??

You didn't understand what I said. Will you get it the second time around or are you just another stupid fkng American? The word 'apparent' is the clue.

So they found absolutely nothing then. Thanks for clarifying.

 

[LeftofLeft]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

Coming from the world of cyber security, the correct answer as two how many times an Election System’s IT infrastructure should be audited is “Continuous”. Twice is simply two snapshots in time. This is should not be a Right or Left debate.

 

[Faun]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

Coming from the world of cyber security, the correct answer as two how many times an Election System’s IT infrastructure should be audited is “Continuous”. Twice is simply two snapshots in time. This is should not be a Right or Left debate.

This is not an ongoing cyber-security issue. The results from rechecking the equipment is not going to change as the equipment is not changing. The machines were audited twice and found to be secure and that no fraud occurred with them. How many more times need they be checked?

 

[MisterBeale]

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

Mirror: This is Professor Alfio D'Urso. He seems to be giving a video affidavit here and it looks like he's reading word-for-word the affidavit that was being circulated on social media a few days ago. It's apparently related to some Italian Federal Court investigation on Leonardo S.p.A. and...

centipedenation.com

". . . There are some articles that the MSM reported on related to Leonardo and some “hacking” of sensitive data by two individuals that were recently arrested for it. The question is, was this story used as a cover for the election hack? Here are some articles on that:
Italian police arrest suspects in Leonardo military, defense data theft | ZDNet
Italian police arrest two over hacking at defence group Leonardo


We will find out soon enough if US authorities will act on this.. . "

 

[Faun]

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

Mirror: This is Professor Alfio D'Urso. He seems to be giving a video affidavit here and it looks like he's reading word-for-word the affidavit that was being circulated on social media a few days ago. It's apparently related to some Italian Federal Court investigation on Leonardo S.p.A. and...

centipedenation.com

". . . There are some articles that the MSM reported on related to Leonardo and some “hacking” of sensitive data by two individuals that were recently arrested for it. The question is, was this story used as a cover for the election hack? Here are some articles on that:
Italian police arrest suspects in Leonardo military, defense data theft | ZDNet
Italian police arrest two over hacking at defence group Leonardo


We will find out soon enough if US authorities will act on this.. . "

Sounds like fake news.

Fact check: Evidence disproves claims of Italian conspiracy to meddle in U.S. election (known as #ItalyGate)

On Jan. 6, 2021, the day supporters of President Donald Trump gathered in Washington, D.C. to protest the certification of the 2020 presidential election results by Congress and ultimately storm the U.S. Capitol, posts began to circulate widely social media claiming that an employee of an...

www.reuters.com

 

[LeftofLeft]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

Coming from the world of cyber security, the correct answer as two how many times an Election System’s IT infrastructure should be audited is “Continuous”. Twice is simply two snapshots in time. This is should not be a Right or Left debate.

This is not an ongoing cyber-security issue. The results from rechecking the equipment is not going to change as the equipment is not changing. The machines were audited twice and found to be secure and that no fraud occurred with them. How many more times need they be checked?

You obviously know nothing about IT. ALL IT systems are vulnerable to compromise; including election systems AND the hardware, software, and policies that support them. Compromise can come via external sources or a malicious insider. Again, the correct answer as to how many times audits for election systems should occur is CONTINUOUS

 

[EMH]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

Faun is all of a sudden quite worried.

For the first time since the steal, faun is freaking out...

Faun knew wray was part of it, that gorsuch kavanaugh, and Comey Barrett were Zionist traitors like faun. Faun knew mike pence was really a "Zionist sleeper cell" as a faux Christian vp.

If faun is now worried, for the first time actual progress he and his cannot stop is underway.

 

[Faun]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

Faun is all of a sudden quite worried.

For the first time since the steal, faun is freaking out...

Faun knew wray was part of it, that gorsuch kavanaugh, and Comey Barrett were Zionist traitors like faun. Faun knew mike pence was really a "Zionist sleeper cell" as a faux Christian vp.

If faun is now worried, for the first time actual progress he and his cannot stop is underway.

 

[struth]

likely a leak...i doubt the professionals at the auditors would intentionally give out bits and pieces before it’s done

The fake news media would. That's why they are denied entry.

it certainly was a smart move to limit access to the media in this highly sensitive area and protect leaks from media outlets that let’s say have a history of misinformation

Then why didn't they keep OANN out as well?

obviously they aren’t an issue

 

[MisterBeale]

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

Mirror: This is Professor Alfio D'Urso. He seems to be giving a video affidavit here and it looks like he's reading word-for-word the affidavit that was being circulated on social media a few days ago. It's apparently related to some Italian Federal Court investigation on Leonardo S.p.A. and...

centipedenation.com

". . . There are some articles that the MSM reported on related to Leonardo and some “hacking” of sensitive data by two individuals that were recently arrested for it. The question is, was this story used as a cover for the election hack? Here are some articles on that:
Italian police arrest suspects in Leonardo military, defense data theft | ZDNet
Italian police arrest two over hacking at defence group Leonardo


We will find out soon enough if US authorities will act on this.. . "

Sounds like fake news.

Fact check: Evidence disproves claims of Italian conspiracy to meddle in U.S. election (known as #ItalyGate)

On Jan. 6, 2021, the day supporters of President Donald Trump gathered in Washington, D.C. to protest the certification of the 2020 presidential election results by Congress and ultimately storm the U.S. Capitol, posts began to circulate widely social media claiming that an employee of an...

www.reuters.com

 

[Faun]

likely a leak...i doubt the professionals at the auditors would intentionally give out bits and pieces before it’s done

The fake news media would. That's why they are denied entry.

it certainly was a smart move to limit access to the media in this highly sensitive area and protect leaks from media outlets that let’s say have a history of misinformation

Then why didn't they keep OANN out as well?

obviously they aren’t an issue

 

[Faun]

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

Mirror: This is Professor Alfio D'Urso. He seems to be giving a video affidavit here and it looks like he's reading word-for-word the affidavit that was being circulated on social media a few days ago. It's apparently related to some Italian Federal Court investigation on Leonardo S.p.A. and...

centipedenation.com

". . . There are some articles that the MSM reported on related to Leonardo and some “hacking” of sensitive data by two individuals that were recently arrested for it. The question is, was this story used as a cover for the election hack? Here are some articles on that:
Italian police arrest suspects in Leonardo military, defense data theft | ZDNet
Italian police arrest two over hacking at defence group Leonardo


We will find out soon enough if US authorities will act on this.. . "

Sounds like fake news.

Fact check: Evidence disproves claims of Italian conspiracy to meddle in U.S. election (known as #ItalyGate)

On Jan. 6, 2021, the day supporters of President Donald Trump gathered in Washington, D.C. to protest the certification of the 2020 presidential election results by Congress and ultimately storm the U.S. Capitol, posts began to circulate widely social media claiming that an employee of an...

www.reuters.com

While he makes some valid points, that guy is looney tunes. And again, there's no evidence to corroborate Italy hacking our election.

 

[Lastamender]

There is no justification for a forensic audit of an elect - any election - to be the target of a lawsuit. Any and every legitimate voter in the US should have no problem forensic audits of elections. Most importantly, neither party Republican or Democrat- is in a position to sue to halt an election audit.

Democrats are probably suing so they can buy time to figure out how to corrupt the audit process or results.

Do you believe Dominion systems were rigged to steal the election?

Not necessarily. However, as someone in the IT industry focused on critical IT infrastructure and someone who believes strongly in voter integrity, I think ongoing forensic analysis and checks is paramount on Dominion Systems and any other part of Election Systems.

Well Dominion machines have already been audited.

Twice.

So how many of these audits are necessary? Or is the right going to just keep challenging the election results until they hear what they want to hear?

By companies not certified to do the audit. Fact.

 

[schmidlap]

This is not an ongoing cyber-security issue. The results from rechecking the equipment is not going to change as the equipment is not changing. The machines were audited twice and found to be secure and that no fraud occurred with them. How many more times need they be checked?

This Trumpy caper cannot hide. It is being flushed out.

Judge rules Cyber Ninjas can't hide procedures from public in Arizona Senate GOP's election audit​

The judge also ruled that lawyers for the Senate GOP and Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbs must reach a deal for Hobbs to inspect the audit site...

The ruling comes after the new judge appointed to the case questioned whether the audit is protecting the privacy of voters in Maricopa County.

"I am not yet persuaded that there has been a showing that the rights of the voters in Maricopa County are being protected," Superior Court Judge Daniel Martin said toward the end of a one-hour hearing on Tuesday.

[Judge rules Cyber Ninjas can't hide procedures from public in Arizona Senate GOP's election audit]

​

 

[LeftofLeft]

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

ITALYGATE: Supreme Court of Italy legal counsel testifying under oath about interference in 2020 election…

Mirror: This is Professor Alfio D'Urso. He seems to be giving a video affidavit here and it looks like he's reading word-for-word the affidavit that was being circulated on social media a few days ago. It's apparently related to some Italian Federal Court investigation on Leonardo S.p.A. and...

centipedenation.com

". . . There are some articles that the MSM reported on related to Leonardo and some “hacking” of sensitive data by two individuals that were recently arrested for it. The question is, was this story used as a cover for the election hack? Here are some articles on that:
Italian police arrest suspects in Leonardo military, defense data theft | ZDNet
Italian police arrest two over hacking at defence group Leonardo


We will find out soon enough if US authorities will act on this.. . "

Sounds like fake news.

Fact check: Evidence disproves claims of Italian conspiracy to meddle in U.S. election (known as #ItalyGate)

On Jan. 6, 2021, the day supporters of President Donald Trump gathered in Washington, D.C. to protest the certification of the 2020 presidential election results by Congress and ultimately storm the U.S. Capitol, posts began to circulate widely social media claiming that an employee of an...

www.reuters.com

While he makes some valid points, that guy is looney tunes. And again, there's no evidence to corroborate Italy hacking our election.

That is what forensic audits and continuous monitoring of the Election systems will confirm.