Democrats work to keep losing

miketx

Diamond Member
Dec 25, 2015
121,555
70,536
2,645
Thanks to Conyers, Identity politics finally is splitting the Democrats

These people just don't get it, we are sick of them.

November 30, 2017
Thanks to Conyers, Identity politics finally is splitting the Democrats
By Thomas Lifson
The strategy of the Democratic Party for the last two generations finally threatens to unravel before our eyes. Blacks and feminists are in conflict over the abusive behavior of John Conyers toward subordinate females.

Normally, Democrats sweep under the rug the obvious clashes among the interest of the various identity groups – for example, the homosexual lobby and the courting of Muslims, whose religion calls for the death penalty for homosexuals. With the support of the MSM, they get away with it by demonizing Republicans as the real enemy. However, we are in the midst of a form of hysteria driven by long repressed anger. Women have been abused in the workplace in the media and political bastions of Democrats for as long as anyone can remember. The party even united behind supporting the obvious abuse that Bill Clinton practiced in Arkansas and brought with him to the White House, where the Oval Office itself was defiled by inducing a young intern to deliver sexual acts along with pizza. That was an indignity that power-seeking feminists supported with absurd doctrines like "one free grope." It made the ongoing abuse all the more painful for the women sacrificed for the cause. They didn't matter – until they did, after Trump became the target and the hopes of impeaching him for sexual improprieties opened the door to tales of misbehavior of others being publicized, so as to set precedents that could be used against the POTUS................more
 
Where are blacks and feminists going to go? The Republicans sure don't give them a reason to cross over to their court.
 
Where are blacks and feminists going to go? The Republicans sure don't give them a reason to cross over to their court.

For feminists, that's a good question.

For blacks, it depends. Those who wish to be violent, lawless thugs, welfare parasites, criminal gangsters, and such, will still be at home under the Democrats. Those who choose to be worthwhile, productive members of society, who wish to work at honest jobs and support themselves and their families in an honorable manner—those who seek to live according to the dream expressed by Martin Luther King, of being judged by the content of their character rather than by the color of their skin—will find themselves very welcome and very much at home among us Republicans.
 
Thanks to Conyers, Identity politics finally is splitting the Democrats

These people just don't get it, we are sick of them.

November 30, 2017
Thanks to Conyers, Identity politics finally is splitting the Democrats
By Thomas Lifson
The strategy of the Democratic Party for the last two generations finally threatens to unravel before our eyes. Blacks and feminists are in conflict over the abusive behavior of John Conyers toward subordinate females.

Normally, Democrats sweep under the rug the obvious clashes among the interest of the various identity groups – for example, the homosexual lobby and the courting of Muslims, whose religion calls for the death penalty for homosexuals. With the support of the MSM, they get away with it by demonizing Republicans as the real enemy. However, we are in the midst of a form of hysteria driven by long repressed anger. Women have been abused in the workplace in the media and political bastions of Democrats for as long as anyone can remember. The party even united behind supporting the obvious abuse that Bill Clinton practiced in Arkansas and brought with him to the White House, where the Oval Office itself was defiled by inducing a young intern to deliver sexual acts along with pizza. That was an indignity that power-seeking feminists supported with absurd doctrines like "one free grope." It made the ongoing abuse all the more painful for the women sacrificed for the cause. They didn't matter – until they did, after Trump became the target and the hopes of impeaching him for sexual improprieties opened the door to tales of misbehavior of others being publicized, so as to set precedents that could be used against the POTUS................more
This is awesome, the parasite is eating itself.

the practice of hate and division has come home to roost.

what does the dnc do now? turn on women or turn on blacks?
 
Where are blacks and feminists going to go? The Republicans sure don't give them a reason to cross over to their court.
depends on the kind of fem. If you mean the modern hate fueled fem; they have one other place and that's the socialists/communists parties.

anyone that's willing to stand up for themselves and their country is welcome in the gop and further right.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
giphy.gif
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:
 
Where are blacks and feminists going to go? The Republicans sure don't give them a reason to cross over to their court.

For feminists, that's a good question.

For blacks, it depends. Those who wish to be violent, lawless thugs, welfare parasites, criminal gangsters, and such, will still be at home under the Democrats. Those who choose to be worthwhile, productive members of society, who wish to work at honest jobs and support themselves and their families in an honorable manner—those who seek to live according to the dream expressed by Martin Luther King, of being judged by the content of their character rather than by the color of their skin—will find themselves very welcome and very much at home among us Republicans.

And you've demonstrated perfectly why you can't even get 10% of the black vote. Because you refer to them as violent, lawless thugs, welfare parasites, and criminal gangsters. The "worthwhile, productive members of society, who wish to work at honest jobs and support themselves and their families in an honorable manner" don't vote for you either.
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?

The GOP attack ads highlighting Dem women abusers will run 24/7 :muahaha:
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?

The GOP attack ads highlighting Dem women abusers will run 24/7 :muahaha:

What attack ads? Did that help you with Bill Clinton?
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?

The GOP attack ads highlighting Dem women abusers will run 24/7 :muahaha:

What attack ads? Did that help you with Bill Clinton?
bill ran on sex appeal

and that was 20 years ago, if the leftist media defended him today the counter media would point that out as well.
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?

The GOP attack ads highlighting Dem women abusers will run 24/7 :muahaha:

What attack ads? Did that help you with Bill Clinton?

Hence I said a "fraction" of the women vote, that's all that need bolt the Dem party to throw elections to the GOP. If it had only been 2-3 creeps outed probably no shift but damn its like an avalanche of women abusers surfacing most of them Dem or liberals and it hasn't peaked yet.
 
If the Dem party loses even a fraction of the women vote they are toast in national elections. Demwits flap their big mouths about a war on women then out themselves as the ones waging the war on women, LMAO :laugh:

But do you really think women are associating all these journalists and news commentators with the Democratic Party nearly as much as they associate Roy Moore and Donald Trump with the Republican Party?

The GOP attack ads highlighting Dem women abusers will run 24/7 :muahaha:

What attack ads? Did that help you with Bill Clinton?
bill ran on sex appeal

and that was 20 years ago, if the leftist media defended him today the counter media would point that out as well.

Rush made a good point today, younger millennial female voters have ZERO tolerance for the kind of stuff Bill pulled 20 years ago.
 
And you've demonstrated perfectly why you can't even get 10% of the black vote. Because you refer to them as violent, lawless thugs, welfare parasites, and criminal gangsters. The "worthwhile, productive members of society, who wish to work at honest jobs and support themselves and their families in an honorable manner" don't vote for you either.

The problem is on your side, thinking that all black people can be lumped together, that in calling out the subset thereof who choose to act like feral, subhuman beasts, necessarily has to do with those who choose to act like responsible, civilized human beings.

In opposition to the great point made by Martin Luther KIng, your side is more concerned with the color of one's skin, or with whatever other “minority” status one may claim; than with the content of one's character. It is your side, not mine, that even cares what color a given person's skin is.

It's not about the color of their skin. It's about the choices that they make, and how they try to fit into a civilized society.

The feral beasts will always fit best under the Democrats, regardless of their skin color. Civilized humans, regardless of skin color, if they make an honest examination of what each party truly stands for, will likely find themselves more aligns with us Republicans.
 
Where are blacks and feminists going to go? The Republicans sure don't give them a reason to cross over to their court.
So they won't vote for anything other than pandering promises and cash payout's? They could vote Republican so they can live their lives on their own terms.
 

Forum List

Back
Top