Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
I don't say you need to get a job and pay your own damn bills because I don't care about you, it's because I do. I want you to be a man. Do you feel better about paying your own damned bills now because I care? No huh, you actually just wanted the money, didn't you? Be honest
Typical Conservative view about healthcare
I got mine, FUK the rest of you
Which would open the door, wider, for even more profiteering by insurance companies.Wanna bet?Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Insurance industry profits grew, in some case quite radically, under ACA. Might wanna put that argument on the backburner.
I would agree that mandating private insurance would open the door for even more profiteering by insurance companies. Which is why I would prefer public health care instead.
No, public health care would compete with private insurance companies and cause them to cut their charges drastically, in order to compete.
Well, as you may have noticed during the last year, we're not like "other countries".Works well in all other countries.
it charges me more in taxs,,,Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Most of our taxes go to military spending, and so little goes to social programs, that this is not a good argument.
If you want to reduce taxes, then get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, etc.
any one person speeding while driving puts their health and others at risk. anyone who drinks and then drives puts one health and others at risk. Any one person texting and driving puts their health and others at risk. most every demofk most likely does one of these three things daily. Fking daily, fk, even multiple times daily. And demofks tell me to care and wear a mask that if anyone's been paying attention hasn't stopped the number of positive china flu positives. More evidence masks are useless.Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Why can’t I “CARE” yet not be willing to pay for your bad decisions in life?
In the leftist totalitarian mind, all the wealth in the nation belongs to the government and it's the role of an elite group to distribute it according to NEED.Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
I don't say you need to get a job and pay your own damn bills because I don't care about you, it's because I do. I want you to be a man. Do you feel better about paying your own damned bills now because I care? No huh, you actually just wanted the money, didn't you? Be honest
Typical Conservative view about healthcare
I got mine, FUK the rest of you
Typical leftist view about healthcare
You got money, I want it, get out the guns!
I like how you described your advocacy of armed robbery to pay for your healthcare as "we" making choices about "our" money ...
The leftist view. What's mine is mine and what's yours is ours, ay big guy?
Which would open the door, wider, for even more profiteering by insurance companies.Wanna bet?Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Insurance industry profits grew, in some case quite radically, under ACA. Might wanna put that argument on the backburner.
I would agree that mandating private insurance would open the door for even more profiteering by insurance companies. Which is why I would prefer public health care instead.
No, public health care would compete with private insurance companies and cause them to cut their charges drastically, in order to compete. Works well in all other countries.
Well, as you may have noticed during the last year, we're not like "other countries".
you can think that all you want,,,Your fucking solutions have only made things worse for the middle classesRight wingers have no better solutions at lower cost; all they do is complain about left wing solutions.Marxists rely on the fact that a population is easily controlled if it is defenseless and all are equally miserable. You will have nothing.... but neither will your neighbors. Your healthcare will be considered substandard by voodoo witchdoctors in sub-saharan africa.... but it won't cost you a penny.
Pick a side.
Not really.
I do not like ACA, but it has made a slight improvement for the middle class.
Premiums are more uniform, more easy to compare, no worries over pre-existing, and slightly lower.
Premiums are only lower when you get government money to help pay for them. They are unaffordable to people who don't qualify for getting Obamacare with the welfare provision
Not sure I believe that.
Insurance rates were increasing by about 15% annually, and were unaffordable before ACA.
I think ACA actually lowered them slightly, and the only increase came from those who did not buy insurance at all before, but now have to because of the penalty.
but its a fact my ins went up after the ACA not down,,,
In the leftist totalitarian mind, all the wealth in the nation belongs to the government and it's the role of an elite group to distribute it according to NEED.Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
I don't say you need to get a job and pay your own damn bills because I don't care about you, it's because I do. I want you to be a man. Do you feel better about paying your own damned bills now because I care? No huh, you actually just wanted the money, didn't you? Be honest
Typical Conservative view about healthcare
I got mine, FUK the rest of you
Typical leftist view about healthcare
You got money, I want it, get out the guns!
I like how you described your advocacy of armed robbery to pay for your healthcare as "we" making choices about "our" money ...
The leftist view. What's mine is mine and what's yours is ours, ay big guy?
you can think that all you want,,,Your fucking solutions have only made things worse for the middle classesRight wingers have no better solutions at lower cost; all they do is complain about left wing solutions.Marxists rely on the fact that a population is easily controlled if it is defenseless and all are equally miserable. You will have nothing.... but neither will your neighbors. Your healthcare will be considered substandard by voodoo witchdoctors in sub-saharan africa.... but it won't cost you a penny.
Pick a side.
Not really.
I do not like ACA, but it has made a slight improvement for the middle class.
Premiums are more uniform, more easy to compare, no worries over pre-existing, and slightly lower.
Premiums are only lower when you get government money to help pay for them. They are unaffordable to people who don't qualify for getting Obamacare with the welfare provision
Not sure I believe that.
Insurance rates were increasing by about 15% annually, and were unaffordable before ACA.
I think ACA actually lowered them slightly, and the only increase came from those who did not buy insurance at all before, but now have to because of the penalty.
but its a fact my ins went up after the ACA not down,,,
But health insurance was going up about 15% a year before ACA, so how could you tell?
that might be because the constitution requires a military and forbids social programs,,,it charges me more in taxs,,,Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Most of our taxes go to military spending, and so little goes to social programs, that this is not a good argument.
If you want to reduce taxes, then get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, etc.
It does nothing of the kind.
It talks about “Defense”
Fighting repeated wars at far ends of the world is not defense
Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Again, premiums are only lower when there's a welfare government benefit included. They are expensive and unusable because of the high deductibles for most people.
It totally fucked me. I had a policy that I loved. It was high deductible and cheap for family coverage. Under Obamacare the premiums skyrocketed then they cancelled it completely.
BTW, insurance company profits aren't yours, you are advocating armed robbery
We're extremely in my husband's position and benefits package covers our family with excellent health coverage at no charge to us. Not the same for associates, before ACA the firm covered them like it does us, now they pay a percentage of costs.
I doubt they support government involvement
promoting isnt [providing at the loss of another person,,,that might be because the constitution requires a military and forbids social programs,,,it charges me more in taxs,,,Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Most of our taxes go to military spending, and so little goes to social programs, that this is not a good argument.
If you want to reduce taxes, then get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, etc.
The constitution intended for there to be no standing military and instead rely on state militias when attacked.
{...
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of ...
...}
Promoting general welfare could include social programs like health care.
thats called tyranny by theft,,,
Your fucking solutions have only made things worse for the middle classesRight wingers have no better solutions at lower cost; all they do is complain about left wing solutions.Marxists rely on the fact that a population is easily controlled if it is defenseless and all are equally miserable. You will have nothing.... but neither will your neighbors. Your healthcare will be considered substandard by voodoo witchdoctors in sub-saharan africa.... but it won't cost you a penny.
Pick a side.
Not really.
I do not like ACA, but it has made a slight improvement for the middle class.
Premiums are more uniform, more easy to compare, no worries over pre-existing, and slightly lower.
Premiums are only lower when you get government money to help pay for them. They are unaffordable to people who don't qualify for getting Obamacare with the welfare provision
Not sure I believe that.
Insurance rates were increasing by about 15% annually, and were unaffordable before ACA.
I think ACA actually lowered them slightly, and the only increase came from those who did not buy insurance at all before, but now have to because of the penalty.
Well, since I operated my own businesses back then, I was writing the full check for my insurance and I know what it cost. Before Obamacare, I paid just under $400 a month for family high deductible coverage. In just 3-4 years under Obamacare it doubled, then they cancelled it completely and similar Obamacare policies were $1,000 a month and up because the taxpayers weren't paying any of my policy
because they are socialist shitholes and have no respect for personal freedom,,,promoting isnt [providing at the loss of another person,,,that might be because the constitution requires a military and forbids social programs,,,it charges me more in taxs,,,Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Most of our taxes go to military spending, and so little goes to social programs, that this is not a good argument.
If you want to reduce taxes, then get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, etc.
The constitution intended for there to be no standing military and instead rely on state militias when attacked.
{...
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of ...
...}
Promoting general welfare could include social programs like health care.
thats called tyranny by theft,,,
Providing universal health care you are calling "tyranny by theft"?
How come the whole rest of the world does it?
that might be because the constitution requires a military and forbids social programs,,,it charges me more in taxs,,,Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Most of our taxes go to military spending, and so little goes to social programs, that this is not a good argument.
If you want to reduce taxes, then get us out of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, the Persian Gulf, the Mediterranean, etc.
The constitution intended for there to be no standing military and instead rely on state militias when attacked.
{...
"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of ...
...}
Promoting general welfare could include social programs like health care.
Which great countries are those?Why?
Because Great Countries care about the well being of everyone
Most of the free world recognize healthcare as a basic human right
False. You have no legitimate right to stick your filthy, greedy hands into someone else's pocket.
There is no "human right" to confiscate the property of others, the only legitimate rights are your rights over your own life, liberty and property
No one can complain, because ACA does not cost anyone any more.
That is because ACA subsidizes the poor only by cutting insurance company profits, not by charging anyone more.
Again, premiums are only lower when there's a welfare government benefit included. They are expensive and unusable because of the high deductibles for most people.
It totally fucked me. I had a policy that I loved. It was high deductible and cheap for family coverage. Under Obamacare the premiums skyrocketed then they cancelled it completely.
BTW, insurance company profits aren't yours, you are advocating armed robbery
The high costs of insurance is not because of ACA but due to the insurance companies high profits.
High deductibles are good.
If you want lower health costs, then we have to get the insurance companies out of it, because they are the one stealing all the profits.
BTW, pre existing conditions through health insurance companies worked the same way. Anyone with a pre-existing condition paid a higher policy. They were not rejected, that implication and statement was totally fking wrong. And, the only policy up tick was for the first year of the policy. I know, my wife was a child diabetic.Yep. I was a business owner through the creation of Obamacare. After Obamacare I kept paying the same amount of medical for my employees, but I refused to pay the increasing amounts and passed the higher costs onto them. I couldn't afford just to absorb it and there was no reason I should have had to
