- Mar 11, 2015
- 82,480
- 48,675
- 2,645
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/dersh...5dtsSwrPh2e319Dkq14HqkL2gCor5MIPpd_uubmPYtHR0
Dershowitz, already at odds with legal consensus over his view that abuse of power does not fall under the high crimes the U.S. Constitution considers impeachable, earned scorn from both sides of the political spectrum.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected, in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," he told senatorsWednesday in the question and answer portion of the trial.
Those words stunned at least the Democratic side of the Senate chamber and a good portion of the legal scholars watching and resonated well into Thursday evening.
"Where his definition of impeachable offences would proscribe too little, this argument would protect too much in presidential misconduct," said Jonathan Turley, a legal scholar at George Washington University and the sole expert witness the Republicans called in the House impeachment hearings who has criticized the impeachment as "rushed and slipshod."
The president as king
Dershowitz's claim was "a descent into constitutional madness," the Democrats' lead prosecutor, Adam Schiff, told senators.
Cable news pundits talked of "a march to monarchy."
Dershowitz, already at odds with legal consensus over his view that abuse of power does not fall under the high crimes the U.S. Constitution considers impeachable, earned scorn from both sides of the political spectrum.
Even some of those who think Trump may have had a legitimate reason to hold up military aid to Ukraine and solicit co-operation with investigations into his political opponent fear Dershowitz's defence of the president could pave the way for an expansion of executive power that could allow Trump and future presidents to pursue political opponents with impunity.
"That is an end-will-always-justify the-means argument that I find troubling," said John Malcolm, vice-president of the Institute for Constitutional Government at the Heritage Foundation in Washington D.C.
The problem is with the Democrats' definition of 'Abuse of Power':
Based on their declaring ' The Impeachment of Donald Trump Begins NOW' right after he completed his oath of office, the Democrats believe defeating them / Hillary in an election is an 'ABUSE OF POWER'.
Based on the fact that EVERY DEMOCRAT 'WITNESS' during the House Impeachment hearings testified eliminating Ukraine corruption was Trump's FOREIGN POLICY from the start, that relations between the US and Ukraine are better now than they were under Obama, and that Trump did NOT violate the Constitution, did NOT break the law, and did NOT abuse his power - based on the fact that when asked to name a crime or Impeachable offense committed by the President they could NOT do so....
It is obvious that Democrats / snowflakes believe any opinion on Foreign Policy not their own is an 'ABUSE OF POWER' .
.
For once, shut up about Dems this Pubs that.
This isn't about partisan shit.
You are setting a precedent (that has already been rolling along a road paved by lots of other similar but ignored precedents) - that not sit well with you when it's a Dem in power doing the same thing.
How much power should the executive have?
How accountable should he be?
Some people are utterly incapable of thinking of the long term effects of actions they are cheering on or of thinking beyond partisan politics here.
Preach Coyote. These idiots seem to think this is some kind of fucking game whereby they can tally up points whenever trump gets to do what he wants. Yep, lets piss off the libs, we won, has been the idiotic mantra of these retards since trump took office. No matter what laws he broke they were happy with him getting away with it just as long as it pisses off the dems. So here we have republicans killing their own congressional check on the president and these guys think its great because a republican stopped the dems from allowing him to do whatever he pleases. Yet let a democrat become president and decide to investigate every republican in America so they can win an election, the hollering, crying, howling and blubbering will be unbearable. This ain't about dem this and dem that. This is about America and the mother fucking republicans voted against America while these guys cheer it on.