Dershowitz Is Insane

[Coyote]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

 

[Coyote]

I don't think any Democrats expected that Trump would be removed from office, this is a political process, not a legal one, and has little to do with guilt or innocence. But I think they hoped to hear from some key witnesses who were prevented from testifying.

 

[progressive hunter]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

 

[playtime]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

it is not hearsay. vindman was a first person witness in on that not so perfect call.

why won't donny let his 'men' testify? why wont he cough up any docs? why is he afraid?

& why was cippolone who bolton said was in on the shake down allowed to be counsel for donny? why was pam bondi- who took a cash buy off - to close down donny's university lawsuit allowed on his team?

cause he is dirty dirty dirty filthy dirty & it will catch up to him & the rest of his flying monkeys.

 

[playtime]

What has been demonstrated is that you trumpers support totalitarianism because you think it won't affect you.

Bwuhahahaha...

The Democrats:

Rigged their 2016 elrction

Sought help from foreign spies and nations - go include Russia - to help them try to prevent Trump from winning then to affect a coup

Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, the USSC, and Trump and his team

Have declared Americans can't be trusted to vote and have / are trying to strip the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leaders

Have been committing perjury, Obstruction, Sedition, and Treason...have violated the Constitution and broken the law for 4 years attempting this failed Impeachment

Have attempted to change the legal justice foundation of this country for everyone except themselves from 'innocent until proven guilty' to 'GUILTY until PROVEN innocent'....while elevating themselves above the Constitution and law

And have and still continue to rig their 2020 Primary and steal w elections...

And you are on your knees before the alter of Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrat Extremism telling fellow cultists to 'PREACH' THE 'WORD' of proven liars, cheats, criminals, terrorist-sympathizers, and enemies of the state.

Don't look now, 'slave', but you are only 'preaching' to your fellow brainwashed slaves, a MINORITY in this country...one that is thankfully SHRINKING after this FAILED coup attempt.

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

but thats not what trump did,,,

But that is what Trump did. And Dershowitz said it's ok.

then how do you explain trumps starting his investigation almost 2 yrs before biden started running???

how do you explain donny signing off on aid for the previous 2 years because ukraine met all their ANTI corruption benchmarks & didn't start any investigation until biden got in the race? i've got links, do you?

 

[Coyote]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

it is not hearsay. vindman was a first person witness in on that not so perfect call.

why won't donny let his 'men' testify? why wont he cough up any docs? why is he afraid?

& why was cippolone who bolton said was in on the shake down allowed to be counsel for donny? why was pam bondi- who took a cash buy off - to close down donny's university lawsuit allowed on his team?

cause he is dirty dirty dirty filthy dirty & it will catch up to him & the rest of his flying monkeys.

I think history will have something to say about this that won't be good.

But I'm more worried about precedents and an awful lot of unchecked power going to the executive. Our government depends on a system of checks and balances and it's being eroded before our eyes.

Not that he SHOULD have been removed from office, after all the other two impeached presidents weren't - but we should have heard from witnesses.

 

[playtime]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

which is why donny refused to meet with mueller face to face & would only give written answers, most (despite him claiming to have the most bestest bigley memory ever a human can possibly have ) answers were 'i don't recall'.

 

[Coyote]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

 

[progressive hunter]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

which is why donny refused to meet with mueller face to face & would only give written answers, most (despite him claiming to have the most bestest bigley memory ever a human can possibly have ) answers were 'i don't recall'.

he was under no legal obligation to meet with him,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

 

[playtime]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

it is not hearsay. vindman was a first person witness in on that not so perfect call.

why won't donny let his 'men' testify? why wont he cough up any docs? why is he afraid?

& why was cippolone who bolton said was in on the shake down allowed to be counsel for donny? why was pam bondi- who took a cash buy off - to close down donny's university lawsuit allowed on his team?

cause he is dirty dirty dirty filthy dirty & it will catch up to him & the rest of his flying monkeys.

I think history will have something to say about this that won't be good.

But I'm more worried about precedents and an awful lot of unchecked power going to the executive. Our government depends on a system of checks and balances and it's being eroded before our eyes.

Not that he SHOULD have been removed from office, after all the other two impeached presidents weren't - but we should have heard from witnesses.

donny has effectively removed a co equal branch of gov'ment from any power they have & the (R)s gave it to him willingly. he is slowly dismantling our institutions one by one.

 

[progressive hunter]

Bwuhahahaha...

The Democrats:

Rigged their 2016 elrction

Sought help from foreign spies and nations - go include Russia - to help them try to prevent Trump from winning then to affect a coup

Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, the USSC, and Trump and his team

Have declared Americans can't be trusted to vote and have / are trying to strip the American people of their Constitutional right to choose their own leaders

Have been committing perjury, Obstruction, Sedition, and Treason...have violated the Constitution and broken the law for 4 years attempting this failed Impeachment

Have attempted to change the legal justice foundation of this country for everyone except themselves from 'innocent until proven guilty' to 'GUILTY until PROVEN innocent'....while elevating themselves above the Constitution and law

And have and still continue to rig their 2020 Primary and steal w elections...

And you are on your knees before the alter of Liberal Progressive Socialist Democrat Extremism telling fellow cultists to 'PREACH' THE 'WORD' of proven liars, cheats, criminals, terrorist-sympathizers, and enemies of the state.

Don't look now, 'slave', but you are only 'preaching' to your fellow brainwashed slaves, a MINORITY in this country...one that is thankfully SHRINKING after this FAILED coup attempt.

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

but thats not what trump did,,,

But that is what Trump did. And Dershowitz said it's ok.

then how do you explain trumps starting his investigation almost 2 yrs before biden started running???

how do you explain donny signing off on aid for the previous 2 years because ukraine met all their ANTI corruption benchmarks & didn't start any investigation until biden got in the race? i've got links, do you?

his investigations started almost 2 yrs before biden entered the race,,,

 

[playtime]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

which is why donny refused to meet with mueller face to face & would only give written answers, most (despite him claiming to have the most bestest bigley memory ever a human can possibly have ) answers were 'i don't recall'.

he was under no legal obligation to meet with him,,,

i didn't say he was. i said why he didn't. just like he's not allowing his administration to testify or hand over any docs - he can't or he's fucked. otherwise he would be doing it all & then some if it could prove his 'innocence'.

 

[playtime]

So I'm assuming you will be fine when a Democrat president withholds aid to other countries and tries to strong arm them into digging up dirt on his political rivals. Am I right?

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

not for personal gain. his own personal gain is not in america's best interest.
it isn't for any president.

 

[Coyote]

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

not for personal gain. his own personal gain is not in america's best interest.
it isn't for any president.

Exactly.

 

[progressive hunter]

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

which is why donny refused to meet with mueller face to face & would only give written answers, most (despite him claiming to have the most bestest bigley memory ever a human can possibly have ) answers were 'i don't recall'.

he was under no legal obligation to meet with him,,,

i didn't say he was. i said why he didn't. just like he's not allowing his administration to testify or hand over any docs - he can't or he's fucked. otherwise he would be doing it all & then some if it could prove his 'innocence'.

its the prosecutions job to prove guilt not his to prove innocence,,,,,,

 

[progressive hunter]

No, but that is not what Trump did.

Would you be fine the next time the House is majority Republican impeaching a Democrat president without evidence...just hearsay? Careful, Obama was accused of much worse and the Republicans didn't impeach him because they couldn't prove the charges. Democrats don't seem to care about proof.

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

not for personal gain. his own personal gain is not in america's best interest.
it isn't for any president.

not trumps fault biden thought running for office would protect him,,,

 

[playtime]

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

which is why donny refused to meet with mueller face to face & would only give written answers, most (despite him claiming to have the most bestest bigley memory ever a human can possibly have ) answers were 'i don't recall'.

he was under no legal obligation to meet with him,,,

i didn't say he was. i said why he didn't. just like he's not allowing his administration to testify or hand over any docs - he can't or he's fucked. otherwise he would be doing it all & then some if it could prove his 'innocence'.

its the prosecutions job to prove guilt not his to prove innocence,,,,,,

oh bullshit. he would be tweeting all day long IN CAPS how he sure showed shifty schiff. he would have a televised event complete with red carpet & search lights with all the monkeys behind him after testifying just to gloat. donny is allllllllllllll about showmanship & he would do it on fox just to give them the ratings.

lol......... are you kidding me? you know it & i know it.

 

[playtime]

Except it wasn't just hearsay. There were many points confirmed by texts, testimony etc. And you could have called Bolton and Mulveny to testify. Why didn't you?

Remember too - you were the guys who impeached Clinton over perjury in a civil case about a blowjob.

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

not for personal gain. his own personal gain is not in america's best interest.
it isn't for any president.

not trumps fault biden thought running for office would protect him,,,

lol... lame conspiracy is all you got.

 

[progressive hunter]

perjury is a crime regardless of the context,,,

But is it impeachable? That's your whole argument. Yes Trump did something wrong, but it isn't impeachable. Impeachment isn't about actual crimes. Never has been.

investigating corruption is his responsibility and not impeachable,,,

not for personal gain. his own personal gain is not in america's best interest.
it isn't for any president.

not trumps fault biden thought running for office would protect him,,,

lol... lame conspiracy is all you got.

regardless it doesnt take away from the fact trumps investigation started almost 2 yrs before biden started his run,,,