Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
STILL waiting on proof that trump did this to get dirt on biden.Bingo TOOBIN ..All Dershowitz has to support his proposition on abuse of power is someone who does not agree with him.
suppositions and assumptions don't count. don't think they ever did in a court of law. but then, we're not really interested in laws anymore.
just satisfying our emotional imbalances.
So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is an Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
His defense of his prowling around with Epstein is equally pathetic.Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
& OJ & claus von bulow & hedda nussbaum. he's made his cash defending scum.
Trumpers never think of consequences. However, I think they like the argument that a president can do as he pleases because they would really like to see the US turned into a monarchy or dictatorship with the Trump family at its head.The Dershowitz defense is almost comical. Basically the President can do whatever he wants to get elected.
Republicans need to remember they will not always be President and what goes around, comes around
why didn't they do it when it was the proper time?STILL waiting on proof that trump did this to get dirt on biden.Bingo TOOBIN ..All Dershowitz has to support his proposition on abuse of power is someone who does not agree with him.
suppositions and assumptions don't count. don't think they ever did in a court of law. but then, we're not really interested in laws anymore.
just satisfying our emotional imbalances.
bolten might clear that up since he is claiming to have had di-rect conversation with donny about that very thing. hmmmm
why is president tinkles afraid to let bolton testify? why are his flying monkeys so reluctant to subpoena him?
right up there with bill clinton saying he didn't make those 28 flights to lolita island.His defense of his prowling around with Epstein is equally pathetic.Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
& OJ & claus von bulow & hedda nussbaum. he's made his cash defending scum.
Who the hell cares about Bill Clinton.right up there with bill clinton saying he didn't make those 28 flights to lolita island.His defense of his prowling around with Epstein is equally pathetic.Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
& OJ & claus von bulow & hedda nussbaum. he's made his cash defending scum.
you're pathetic.
why didn't they do it when it was the proper time?STILL waiting on proof that trump did this to get dirt on biden.Bingo TOOBIN ..All Dershowitz has to support his proposition on abuse of power is someone who does not agree with him.
suppositions and assumptions don't count. don't think they ever did in a court of law. but then, we're not really interested in laws anymore.
just satisfying our emotional imbalances.
bolten might clear that up since he is claiming to have had di-rect conversation with donny about that very thing. hmmmm
why is president tinkles afraid to let bolton testify? why are his flying monkeys so reluctant to subpoena him?
why are you fucking idiots making shit up as you go and crying out when told no?
Lying fuck.right up there with bill clinton saying he didn't make those 28 flights to lolita island.His defense of his prowling around with Epstein is equally pathetic.Dershowit-less is a fucking idiot. The man is Epstein colluded and now argues a president is essentially a fucking Latin American dictator, what a fucking loser.So now the defense is this: It is OK for a sitting President to base his decisions on what is best for his campaign. We can no nothing if that includes using federal funds. We can do nothing if it includes bribes.
The "he did it, so what" defense lives.
^ i could not believe what i was hearing. unfuckingbelievable.
& OJ & claus von bulow & hedda nussbaum. he's made his cash defending scum.
you're pathetic.
Translation...Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?Define the connection between the Electoral Vote and wealth.
I would agree that a wealthy contributor has more influence than a poor individual.
make the connection between 'slums' & the popular vote & why they shouldn't matter or count.
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
^^^ translation - you want cash & property to be the deciding factor in who has the right to vote in your amerika ; & will mask that notion by throwing in a straw man about city management to hide your very pathetic view, because the conversation was about voting & not whatever you are trying to throw in as a deflection from that conversation & seem to trying to say who I would or would not vote for with absolutely no basis whatsoever.
Thanks for not being able to answer the question.So your solution is to offer no assistance? Really?Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?Define the connection between the Electoral Vote and wealth.
I would agree that a wealthy contributor has more influence than a poor individual.
make the connection between 'slums' & the popular vote & why they shouldn't matter or count.
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
Trump's solution to homelessness is bulldozer their tent cities.
Translation...Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?make the connection between 'slums' & the popular vote & why they shouldn't matter or count.
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
^^^ translation - you want cash & property to be the deciding factor in who has the right to vote in your amerika ; & will mask that notion by throwing in a straw man about city management to hide your very pathetic view, because the conversation was about voting & not whatever you are trying to throw in as a deflection from that conversation & seem to trying to say who I would or would not vote for with absolutely no basis whatsoever.
You know nothing and will vote for anyone who tugs at your heart strings.
Thanks for not being able to answer the question.So your solution is to offer no assistance? Really?Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?make the connection between 'slums' & the popular vote & why they shouldn't matter or count.
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
Trump's solution to homelessness is bulldozer their tent cities.
So answer the original question...Translation...Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
^^^ translation - you want cash & property to be the deciding factor in who has the right to vote in your amerika ; & will mask that notion by throwing in a straw man about city management to hide your very pathetic view, because the conversation was about voting & not whatever you are trying to throw in as a deflection from that conversation & seem to trying to say who I would or would not vote for with absolutely no basis whatsoever.
You know nothing and will vote for anyone who tugs at your heart strings.
^^^ fake news. but thanx for playing.
Cool story...Thanks for not being able to answer the question.So your solution is to offer no assistance? Really?Translation...You think most people in slums have the educational credentials to manage a city’s infrastructure?
If so, let’s discuss all the elements of maintaining a city.
education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
Trump's solution to homelessness is bulldozer their tent cities.
deflective straw man questions need not be answered.
So answer the original question...Translation...Translation...education, just like cash in the bank or the amt of property owned, doesn't factor into who is eligible to vote in america. maybe it should be in yer vision of amerika, but as it stands right now, the constituion says ne'eh.
your straw man is duly noted & dismissed.
You don’t have an ounce of knowledge about how to manage a city and you would vote for any clown who hands out public assistance.
^^^ translation - you want cash & property to be the deciding factor in who has the right to vote in your amerika ; & will mask that notion by throwing in a straw man about city management to hide your very pathetic view, because the conversation was about voting & not whatever you are trying to throw in as a deflection from that conversation & seem to trying to say who I would or would not vote for with absolutely no basis whatsoever.
You know nothing and will vote for anyone who tugs at your heart strings.
^^^ fake news. but thanx for playing.
Elaborate on a few qualifications for managing a city.
