DeSantis will finish the wall.

[Woodznutz]

Desantis is a guy who knows how to get things done, he is going to jump in soon, likely waited because he knew Trump was going to get a lot of attention as the democrats keep going after him....I think he will jump in at the end of the month......

He is the best Republican candidate in decades, and he isn't going to do things half assed or out of control.

The country, and the Republican party, needs him badly.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

The country, and the Republican party, needs him badly.

Not if he doesn’t take a stance in opposition to AGW alarmism.

 

[2aguy]

The country, and the Republican party, needs him badly.

Yes.......he is Trump 2.0....all the fight, without the drama and without the easy mistakes.

 

[2aguy]

Not if he doesn’t take a stance in opposition to AGW alarmism.

He stood up to the chinese flu fascists so he won't be supporting the AGW stupidity any time soon.......

 

[Woodznutz]

He stood up to the chinese flu fascists so he won't be supporting the AGW stupidity any time soon.......

Actually, he could make lemonade out of that lemon.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

He stood up to the chinese flu fascists so he won't be supporting the AGW stupidity any time soon.......

But he’s said nothing which tells me he’s being political.

 

[LilOlLady]

We do not need a wall but troops on the border as we did in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

We would have to change our laws to put an armed military force on the border dedicated to arrest and seizure.

Perhaps we should.

 

[Lastamender]

DeSantis Promises to Finish Trump's Border Wall if Elected President​

“I think that this is an agency that’s developed a really toxic culture. I think it’s particularly in their D.C. offices that have been weaponized against people that think like you and me…but one of the things that I will do, I will go in and I am not going to accept the canard that they’re an independent agency. They’re part of the Executive Branch, the DOJ (Department of Justice) and FBI answer to the elected President and I will hold them directly accountable. If they’re not going after like BLM rioters, I will call them in the office and I will tell them to do it. And if they don’t, they will be fired,” stated DeSantis.

DeSantis Promises to Finish Trump's Border Wall if Elected President

Florida Governor and now-presidential candidate Ron DeSantis (R-FL) made an appearance on The Dana Show with Dana Loesch for one of his first interviews since a

floridianpress.com

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Us Jurisdiction For Subjects By Title In Us Legal Immigration System "

* Diplomacy Through Social Security Totalization Enforcement Of Citizenship In Countries Of Origin *

We would have to change our laws to put an armed military force on the border dedicated to arrest and seizure.
Perhaps we should.

Nothing will be solved until us constitution is enforced , such that children born in the united states to migrants , whom are not subjects by title in us legal immigration system , and even if they are , are given citizenship in the country of maternal citizenship .

Us citizenship is an endowment and not a protection , and " subject to the jurisdiction thereof " clause from us 14th amendment is not a triviality .

When migrants , whom are not subjects in us legal immigration system , and therefore not eligible for endowments from us government , are given an opportunity for endowments from us government , by producing a child that is a us citizen , what would anyone expect to be a disincentive ?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The 14th Amendment, monk-eye, gives babies born in America of anyone except diplomats.

You would have to change the constitution.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Us Autonomy To Be Determined By Legal Immigration "

* By All Means Stop It *

The 14th Amendment, monk-eye, gives babies born in America of anyone except diplomats.
You would have to change the constitution.

Neither diplomats nor legal migrants come to the united states at will , and it is through a process of approval that sojourners become subjects by title in us legal immigration system and therefore subject to or not subject to us jurisdiction .

It is an easy interpretation that those entering the us without being subject by title in us legal immigration system remain subject to the jurisdiction of the country from which they are a citizen , meaning that those countries are responsible for protecting and prosecuting offenses against their citizens .

United States v. Wong Kim Ark - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The court's dissenters argued that being subject to the jurisdiction of the United States meant not being subject to any foreign power[9]—that is, not being claimed as a citizen by another country via jus sanguinis (inheriting citizenship from a parent)—an interpretation which, in the minority's view, would have excluded "the children of foreigners, happening to be born to them while passing through the country".[10]

A 2010 review of the history of the Citizenship Clause notes that the Wong Kim Ark decision held that the guarantee of birthright citizenship "applies to children of foreigners present on American soil" and states that the Supreme Court "has not re-examined this issue since the concept of 'illegal alien' entered the language".[12]

Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants

" Policies In Place Against Birth Tourism For Legal Migrants " * It Is Time To Require jus sanguinis * A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to a US island that has become popular for birth tourism A Japanese woman was asked to take a pregnancy test before flying to...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It is obvious why Monk-eye never finished higher ed.

The law is clear. No natural born argument exists to strip people of their citizenship.

Their arguments are so high schoolish.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Enforcement Of ' And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof ; Clause Is Easy Except For Lawyers Needing To Bilk "

* Brilliant Genius Of Fools Arrogantly Omitting The Elementary *

The law is clear. No natural born argument exists to strip people of their citizenship.
Their arguments are so high schoolish.

There is not a justification to subvert a most elementary and direct conclusion about meaning imbued in " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " .

The policy of Jus sanguinis - Wikipedia citizenship is a direct inference , where the nation of origin for a sojourner , whom is not a subject by title in us legal immigration system , remains responsible for issuing a retort for violations of civil liberties against its citizens , and remains responsible for issuing the endowment of citizenship to children born abroad from its citizens .

It follows that foreign nations , in which individuals are traveling , would collaborate within nations of origin in issuing a retort for violations against civil liberties of sojourners , though the foreign nation is not technically , by literal foundation of law , responsible for doing so except by an agreement of diplomacy .

A basic premise for sovereignty of a greater state of individuals is its ability to exercise autonomy over its own self determination , within which positive liberties of endowment such as citizenship are included .

The extension of citizenship is a privilege of endowment for citizens of us republic, and an extension of citizenship in us republic does not qualify as a protection .


* Social Security Totalization And Jus Sanguinis *

Totalization agreements - Wikipedia are in place to handle providing social security payments , and similar extension through diplomacy could be applied to establish jus sanguinis citizenship .

Consider the amount of social subsistence the cabal of theistic humanism has incurred for us citizens , given neonatal care , future social subsistence and bureaucratic infrastructure .


* Switch Flipped *

It is obvious why Monk-eye never finished higher ed.

When statements by this moniker fit a category of beyond reason and ridiculous , this moniker will do its best to let everyone know ii .

 

[Woodznutz]

We do not need a wall but troops on the border as we did in Iraq and Afghanistan.

All we ever needed was a tall chain link fence covered with razor wire, some electronic sensors, and armed personnel and dogs to guard it. Rotating Army and Marine units can set up field units along the border to provide manpower. Guarding perimeter fences is very familiar duty to all soldiers (been there, done that).

 

[Woodznutz]

Not if he doesn’t take a stance in opposition to AGW alarmism.

He supports domestically produced energy from fossil fuels. That alone flies in the face of the global warming movement. He also supports domestic manufacturing, which would entail the use of more fossil fuels here.

 

[Augustine_]

Watched DeSantis speak in Iowa where he offered to send 'his people' down to finish the wall. A subtle poke at Trump, Biden, and Governor Abbot methinks.

That aside DeSantis hit all the right themes in his speech. He's way behind Trump in the polls, but that might change if he gets more exposure. Thoughts?

Every time more wall gets built, illegal immigration goes up! Please, no more!

 

[Woodznutz]

Every time more wall gets built, illegal immigration goes up! Please, no more!

Only because Trumps wall was never finished, and that previous walls weren't built properly, or maintained, or properly guarded.

 

[Augustine_]

Only because Trumps wall was never finished, and that previous walls weren't built properly, or maintained, or properly guarded.

Sure tell yourself that, snowflake

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

" Enforcement Of ' And Subject To The Jurisdiction Thereof ; Clause Is Easy Except For Lawyers Needing To Bilk "

* Brilliant Genius Of Fools Arrogantly Omitting The Elementary *
and reason and ridiculous , this moniker will do its best to let everyone know ii .

<sni[>

John Edgar Slow Horses said:
kyzr continues to lie. FactChecking states "But Trump’s claim was debunked by fact-checkers in March, after he first made the statement during a Fox News appearance, and it’s still not true. There is no evidence Trump made any formal request about deploying 10,000 National Guard troops before the rally." Fact check: Trump repeats false claim that Pelosi rejected request for National Guard ahead of Jan. 6

https://apnews.com › article › fact-check-trump-order-national-guard-156055113284

Trump did not sign an order to deploy 20,000 troops on Jan. 6​

Oct 19, 2022As The Associated Press has previously reported, Trump was not involved in decision-making related to the National Guard on Jan. 6, and Pelosi did not stand in their way. Trump did say during a 30-second call on Jan. 5 with then Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller that "they" were going to need 10,000 troops on Jan. 6, according ...