thanatos144
Gold Member
- Mar 29, 2009
- 15,327
- 1,351
we already have that.The Republicans in the House added a poison pill to the FIX NICS bill. That can't pass the senate. What is wrong with having a background check actually include all the background it is supposed to? What does CCW reciprocity have to do with it? Why should one state have its laws not followed because a visitor from another state comes there? A person from Colorado can't go to Jersey and smoke dope recreationally just because it's legal in Colorado. He isn't IN Colorado.I am not saying "ban all semi-auto weapons" because it has been explained to me that most guns in this country, whether rifle or handgun, are semiauto's in the sense that a bullet enters the chamber as soon as one has been fired. The argument is not against all guns, so saying "all semi-auto's" wouldn't be accurate.Playing the "That Isn't What You Call It" game is getting old. Everyone knows what we're talking about. I agree we need a word that describes it more accurately than "weapons of mass destruction," but until that happens, you might do better addressing the actual issue rather than playing semantics games that won't get you anywhere.You're a lying ****.
An assault weapon is a fully automatic weapon.
Fucking moron.
Your side can't say "ban semi-auto weapons" because you know it will never happen. so you make up soooper sceeery words for them, and hope you fool enough people to get legislation passed.
The Democratic control proposal would ban all semi-autos, even handguns.
BUT BUT BUT I THOUGHT THE DEMS WEREN'T GOING TO BAN GUNS!!!
either you are all liars, all idiots, or somewhere in between.
The Dems just proposed a law that would ban all semi-autos except a few rifles.
The Republicans are terrified of having to vote on any gun legislation. They will wiggle out of it any way they can.