Did NC and TX change their Voting Procedure?

[Winco]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

 

[Shelzin]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

Yeah... It's time to revamp and improve our election process so this shit stops.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

Yeah, it will be interesting when the ballot count has to be presented (legal ballots that is).

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

Yep.

Can certify ANY elections.

So, now we go to the 12th Amendment.

Hey, Biden still has a shot....

 

[debbiedowner]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

The way things are going I guess as private citizen's we can sue Tx, Nc, Florida and any state that didn't carry Biden.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

This will NOT have the desired effect (basically admitting that the 12th Amendment must control)

 

[Indeependent]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

I Googled and Google didn't listen to you.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

 

[Rambunctious]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

Not by a governors decree...they went through the proper legislative procedures...if one Texas county changed theirs that is punishable by Texas law....

 

[candycorn]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

An act of the legislature you say:

The governor of Texas issuing a proclamation isn't a legislative action....

Governor Abbott Extends Early Voting Period For November 3rd Election

gov.texas.gov

So what do you say to all those Texicans who voted early? Sorry...your vote doesn't count?

Here is the part where you tell us that when Abbott issues an order it is perfectly fine but when officials in other states issue an order it is somehow bogus.

Hop to it.

 

[Winco]

they went through the proper legislative procedures

Did they, and the other States didn't.

Prove it. You must PROVE it. That IS how it works.

You can't, you won't, go back to mama.

 

[MarathonMike]

The only way the SCOTUS doesn't take the case is if Chief Justice Roberts has another epiphany and decides for the country election integrity doesn't matter.

 

[konradv]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

 

[Winco]

is if Chief Justice Roberts has another epiphany

OR
Judge Roberts realizes that these redonkulous claims are in fact #redonkulous.
Good Luck Losers.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

 

[Pogo]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

ZACKLY. Article II states "in such Manner as the Legislatures thereof may direct", not "in such Manner as the butthurt AG of frickin' Texas may direct".

 

[Pogo]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Election 2020: US Supreme Court determines NC voting rules | Raleigh News & Observer

And in TX.

How split-ticket voting might have affected some election outcomes in Texas | The Texas Tribune

What appears to have been their lifeline was a willingness of some Texas voters to split their tickets, rejecting Trump but nonetheless pulling the levers for the Republican Party’s other candidates. And it may have been aided by lawmakers’ decision to eliminate straight-ticket voting in the state, starting with this year’s election.

I hear that WI, MI, AZ, PA, NV and GA are developing a counter lawsuit against TX, what comes around goes around.

Not by a governors decree...they went through the proper legislative procedures...if one Texas county changed theirs that is punishable by Texas law....

Exactly.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The sued states did not LEGALLY NOR CONSTITUTIONALLY change their system, IT requires an act of the Legislature in a State to change the process. By the Constitution.,

Whose Constitution? Each state has its own and the SC would probably not want to interfere.

The US Constitution applies to HOW presidential elections are decided READ it some time. It specifically gives the authority to STATE legislatures NOT Governors or committees.

Bullshit. The COTUS doesn't mention popular Presidential elections AT ALL. States were choosing EC Electors by non-popular vote methods as late as 1860.

AS directed BY the State Legislature. As the Constitution SPECIFICALLY says.

 

[Winco]

So, you contards are still clinging to:

1) Massive Fraud
2) If not Fraud, then SCOTUS
3) Then Hannity, OAN, NewsMax will make up more shit for you to digest.

4) Locally, I have a 770AM, Todd Herman, Host. You guys would love him. Spreads CT constantly, to fire up the base. I spend some of my 30 minute commute to work listening to this bot, just for fun. LOLLOLLing is fun.