Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They showed a bunch of super shady money transfers and suggested that it looked like criminal activity. Their suggestion seems pretty spot on. I have yet to hear a plausible alternative explanation for these transfers and why they were funneling it through so many LLC's..No, they didn’t update you on their on their investigation. What they did was to spin a tale about what they think they might have found. There is a whole lot of speculation in that memo, and none of it is backed up with evidence.
They made a lot of accusations and insinuations, which would require evidence they don’t have, and have no legal right to ask for. What they don’t have is any evidence that any kind of crime has been committed.
The corporate entities created might have been created to launder funds. They could be obscuring illegal payments. But after 30 years experience in banking finance and law, I seriously doubt it. I look at all of the transfers, deposits and cheques that the Republicans have presented and see a normal international investment group with both active partners and silent partners, working on projects in multiple countries. A close friend with an MBA and a background in international banking and finance saw the same thing. Time magazine called the report a “swing and a miss”.
The problem being that it takes a background in law, business and finance to conduct a knowledge based assessment of that memo. And that’s what the Republicans are counting on. That their voters don’t have the expertise to spot the gaping holes in the story they’re selling you.
Hunter Biden has said that this was the group of family and friends who were investing in this opportunity in China, and the monies coming out were the investors getting their return on investment. And while I might have questions about that $10 million wire transfer, and what that distribution was all about, it’s not because I suspect it was criminal. Rather I suspect that China pushed them out.
Both Russia and China used the same strategy of inviting investment in their countries when they were building a capitalist society, and an investor class, and then forcing foreign capital or ownership out when their businesses are successful.
I have no doubt that Hunter Biden has cashed in on his name. But I have a lot of serious doubts that he broke any laws in doing so, or that the entire Biden family is both lawless and corrupt.
Selling government influence is most certainly a crime. Where is the credible proof that happened? Innuendo is not proof.Only you stupid Moon Bats are confused about selling government influence to get filthy rich somehow not being a treasonous crime.
What evidence?Of course there was evidence for sexual battery. He was found guilty of it. He was not found guilty of rape because that state has very specific definitions for sexual crimes.
NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov
www.nysenate.gov
Do congressional committees routinely reveal their evidence when indictments could be on the way? It would seem a little premature to be whining about it.Selling government influence is most certainly a crime. Where is the credible proof that happened? Innuendo is not proof.
Yes, they do. Revealing evidence is the purpose of a congressional committee.Do congressional committees routinely reveal their evidence when indictments could be on the way? It would seem a little premature to be whining about it.
Is it cool if they continue their investigation first, or is it required that they prove it RIGHT NOW?Selling government influence is most certainly a crime. Where is the credible proof that happened? Innuendo is not proof.
Kind of funny coming from the party that didn’t see anything wrong with George Santos.They showed a bunch of super shady money transfers and suggested that it looked like criminal activity. Their suggestion seems pretty spot on. I have yet to hear a plausible alternative explanation for these transfers and why they were funneling it through so many LLC's..
No need to check the transcripts. Ill tell you right now. Their evidence was the word of a woman who isnt even sure what year it took place. Thats it. There is no other evidence than that.You'll have to check the trial transcript to get a complete list of the evidence, or perhaps ask the jury members that voted unanimously to convict him.
There's plenty of credible evidence against Biden, sweetheart. Pull your head out of the sand.Perhaps I should reconsider the term and start calling for credible evidence.
That's not how it works. Just because their political opponents say something looks shady doesn't prove anything.They showed a bunch of super shady money transfers and suggested that it looked like criminal activity. Their suggestion seems pretty spot on. I have yet to hear a plausible alternative explanation for these transfers and why they were funneling it through so many LLC's..
I think it is cute how you provided a MSM link as a source for your claim that Don can't fuck properly. LOL!!!While you may think that Trump is such a great ladies man (he's not), and while you think you have just described the "proper" way to finger bang a female, you forgot one thing..............
Trump doesn't engage in any of that kind of foreplay, according to what he said on tape. He said that if you're a star, you can simply walk up and "grab them by the pussy".
Here...............................
Trump caught on hot mic making lewd comments about women in 2005
A decade before Trump became the Republican nominee for president, his candid views on women were caught on tape.www.nbcnews.com
A decade before Donald Trump became the Republican nominee for president, he shared candid and lewd views on women that were caught on tape.
“I’m automatically attracted to beautiful women — I just start kissing them, it’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything," he said in the 2005 conversation. "Grab 'em by the pussy."
You think the GOP saw nothing wrong with Santos? You have no idea what youre talking about. Santos got ZERO support from us.Kind of funny coming from the party that didn’t see anything wrong with George Santos.
Trump was not "found guilty" of sexual battery.Of course there was evidence for sexual battery. He was found guilty of it. He was not found guilty of rape because that state has very specific definitions for sexual crimes.
NYS Open Legislation | NYSenate.gov
Who said they were required to prove it yesterday? What are you even talking about?That's not how it works. Just because their political opponents say something looks shady doesn't prove anything.
LOL!!! Get your head out of your ass.Selling government influence is most certainly a crime. Where is the credible proof that happened? Innuendo is not proof.
Got links to back up any of the bullshit you just spewed all over the thread?
One would assume that they wanted to show the world some shady as fuck money transfers in an effort to turn the public against Biden.So why did they make such a big deal about that press conference?
With no eveidence except he said she saidOne difference is a jury that was approved by trump and his legal team found him guilty, and set his fine at 5 million dollars, while trump's party refused to vote to find him guilty in the impeachment. Several of those republicans who voted not guilty publicly admitted he was actually guilty, but they didn't convict him for political reasons.
