Diner Takes Down Bacon Sign That Offended Muslim Woman

Yup! It's happened again, folks. Another foolish over-tolerant American, gives in to another UNtolerant Muslim, demanding that things be done the Muslim way, over the American way. It happened in a diner in Winooski, Vermont, when a Muslim woman who described herself as a “vegan and a member of a Muslim household” called a sign advertising bacon, offensive, the Burlington Free Press reported.

HA HA. How many times have we heard that word ? > ("offensive") So instead of the diner owner simply telling the woman "Sorry, but we don't have any restrictions on bacon in the USA," this dumbo caved in to this amazingly rude Muslim woman and not only took down the sign, but also apologized to her.

This act of cowardice, and disrespect for all Americans, was backed up by the town manager — using words like diversity and tolerance and dialogue.
“Winooski is a diverse community, and we like it that way,” city manager Katherine Decarreau told the Burlington Free Press.

Well, sorry Katherine, but diversity is one thing, Dumping American culture (the foods we eat) in order to appease the demands of a foreign culture is downright traitorous and disrepectful to the American people (last time I checked, Vermont was still part of America). How about asking the Muslim woman to exhibit a bit of "tolerance" herself for the WAY WE DO THINGS, here in America ? This reminds me of the infamous Lina Morales-Rising Star incident that blew up over a BLT sandwich.

Needless to say this little chunk of
Islamization (like thousands of others before it) enraged many citizens who fired off letters of disapproval. A Todd Starnes (author of the link article) said >> "This is America. We love bacon. If you have a problem with that, then feel free to head to the border. And don’t let the bacon grease hit you on the way out. May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!"

May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!

Vermont Diner Takes Down Bacon Sign That Offended Muslim Woman Fox News Insider

It in all likelihood did not have all that much significance and was just an every day act of kindness.

It is part of the significance of the Muslim Brotherhood's Islamization strategy to overthrow the US govt, and replace it with an Islamic state, as vowed in the Explanatory Memorandum.
 
I'd be willing to bet the complaint was based more on veganism than on being a muslim.

I've known plenty of muslims, and they never mentioned anything when I talk or post about bacon. Vegans, on the other hand, have often called me a murderer for my fondness for the candy of the meat world.

Here's the part of the Muslim population you HAVEN'T been knowing >>

Read Baby! Read!

1. They Must Be Stopped by Brigitte Gabriel

2. Stealth Jihad by Robert Spencer

3. The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam (and the Crusades) by Robert Spencer

4. Infiltration by Paul Sperry

5. Muslim Mafia by P. David Gaubatz & Paul Sperry

6. Shariah: The Threat to America by the Center for Security Policy

7. The Third Jihad (DVD) by Dr. Zuddhi Jasser
 
I'd be willing to bet the complaint was based more on veganism than on being a muslim.

I've known plenty of muslims, and they never mentioned anything when I talk or post about bacon. Vegans, on the other hand, have often called me a murderer for my fondness for the candy of the meat world.

POLICE are understood to have confiscated a collection of porcelain pigs from the front window of a woman's house in the same road as Leicester's main mosque following a complaint from local Muslims that the display was offensive.​

One instance of Islamization among THOUSANDS.
 
Yup! It's happened again, folks. Another foolish over-tolerant American, gives in to another UNtolerant Muslim, demanding that things be done the Muslim way, over the American way. It happened in a diner in Winooski, Vermont, when a Muslim woman who described herself as a “vegan and a member of a Muslim household” called a sign advertising bacon, offensive, the Burlington Free Press reported.

HA HA. How many times have we heard that word ? > ("offensive") So instead of the diner owner simply telling the woman "Sorry, but we don't have any restrictions on bacon in the USA," this dumbo caved in to this amazingly rude Muslim woman and not only took down the sign, but also apologized to her.

This act of cowardice, and disrespect for all Americans, was backed up by the town manager — using words like diversity and tolerance and dialogue.
“Winooski is a diverse community, and we like it that way,” city manager Katherine Decarreau told the Burlington Free Press.

Well, sorry Katherine, but diversity is one thing, Dumping American culture (the foods we eat) in order to appease the demands of a foreign culture is downright traitorous and disrepectful to the American people (last time I checked, Vermont was still part of America). How about asking the Muslim woman to exhibit a bit of "tolerance" herself for the WAY WE DO THINGS, here in America ? This reminds me of the infamous Lina Morales-Rising Star incident that blew up over a BLT sandwich.

Needless to say this little chunk of
Islamization (like thousands of others before it) enraged many citizens who fired off letters of disapproval. A Todd Starnes (author of the link article) said >> "This is America. We love bacon. If you have a problem with that, then feel free to head to the border. And don’t let the bacon grease hit you on the way out. May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!"

May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!

Vermont Diner Takes Down Bacon Sign That Offended Muslim Woman Fox News Insider

Wow!
Talk about skewed reporting!
The sign was in a garden, not inside the diner (although to be fair to Fox News, they reported this part correctly in your linked article).

The town manager also said
City Manager Decarreau said the city has no plans to make a policy decision on the advertisement, though she will be asking the Winooski Coalition for a Safe and Peaceful Community for advice.

"Like I said, it's an issue of free speech, and I'm not sure where city government gets involved," Decarreau said.
The diner removed a sign in an outside garden because in their judgement offending a section of the population in a culturally diverse town might be bad for business.
That's a private business decision.
Conservatives and Libertarians should applaud this private company's right to decide what's right for their business.

This is the quality of comment from some on Facebook
"Please try to tell as many people as you can around there about this ISIS loving anti-American business," wrote one commenter. "Let's run them out of business and then run the owners out if the USA. They can go open a place in Palestine."

Right. And the intolerance of petty little shrews in a culturally diverse community is not offensive to anyone, eh?

What needs to happen here: the sane members of that community, if there be any, should demonstrate their distaste for the restaurant owner's cowardice, for the owner's kowtowing to the impertinence of intolerant, self-appointed hall monitors, instead of standing up for real tolerance. In other words, they should find somewhere else to eat.

In the meantime, conservatives and libertarians don't need any lessons about private property rights from the denizens of multiculturalism, i.e., from the conformists of faux diversity. Unlike the obtuse proponents of normative relativism, we know what real tolerance is and what is truly offensive. Check?
Why does anything 'need' to happen?
If someone feels strongly enough about the private business owner's actions then they might refuse to eat there, they might write a letter to the paper, they might complain to their hairdresser...
But, good on you for respecting private rights.

HERE is why something needs to happen >>




Yup! It's happened again, folks. Another foolish over-tolerant American, gives in to another UNtolerant Muslim, demanding that things be done the Muslim way, over the American way. It happened in a diner in Winooski, Vermont, when a Muslim woman who described herself as a “vegan and a member of a Muslim household” called a sign advertising bacon, offensive, the Burlington Free Press reported.

HA HA. How many times have we heard that word ? > ("offensive") So instead of the diner owner simply telling the woman "Sorry, but we don't have any restrictions on bacon in the USA," this dumbo caved in to this amazingly rude Muslim woman and not only took down the sign, but also apologized to her.

This act of cowardice, and disrespect for all Americans, was backed up by the town manager — using words like diversity and tolerance and dialogue.
“Winooski is a diverse community, and we like it that way,” city manager Katherine Decarreau told the Burlington Free Press.

Well, sorry Katherine, but diversity is one thing, Dumping American culture (the foods we eat) in order to appease the demands of a foreign culture is downright traitorous and disrepectful to the American people (last time I checked, Vermont was still part of America). How about asking the Muslim woman to exhibit a bit of "tolerance" herself for the WAY WE DO THINGS, here in America ? This reminds me of the infamous Lina Morales-Rising Star incident that blew up over a BLT sandwich.

Needless to say this little chunk of
Islamization (like thousands of others before it) enraged many citizens who fired off letters of disapproval. A Todd Starnes (author of the link article) said >> "This is America. We love bacon. If you have a problem with that, then feel free to head to the border. And don’t let the bacon grease hit you on the way out. May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!"

May God Bless America – liberty and bacon for all!

Vermont Diner Takes Down Bacon Sign That Offended Muslim Woman Fox News Insider

Wow!
Talk about skewed reporting!
The sign was in a garden, not inside the diner (although to be fair to Fox News, they reported this part correctly in your linked article).

The town manager also said
City Manager Decarreau said the city has no plans to make a policy decision on the advertisement, though she will be asking the Winooski Coalition for a Safe and Peaceful Community for advice.

"Like I said, it's an issue of free speech, and I'm not sure where city government gets involved," Decarreau said.
The diner removed a sign in an outside garden because in their judgement offending a section of the population in a culturally diverse town might be bad for business.
That's a private business decision.
Conservatives and Libertarians should applaud this private company's right to decide what's right for their business.

This is the quality of comment from some on Facebook
"Please try to tell as many people as you can around there about this ISIS loving anti-American business," wrote one commenter. "Let's run them out of business and then run the owners out if the USA. They can go open a place in Palestine."

Right. And the intolerance of petty little shrews in a culturally diverse community is not offensive to anyone, eh?

What needs to happen here: the sane members of that community, if there be any, should demonstrate their distaste for the restaurant owner's cowardice, for the owner's kowtowing to the impertinence of intolerant, self-appointed hall monitors, instead of standing up for real tolerance. In other words, they should find somewhere else to eat.

In the meantime, conservatives and libertarians don't need any lessons about private property rights from the denizens of multiculturalism, i.e., from the conformists of faux diversity. Unlike the obtuse proponents of normative relativism, we know what real tolerance is and what is truly offensive. Check?
Why does anything 'need' to happen?
If someone feels strongly enough about the private business owner's actions then they might refuse to eat there, they might write a letter to the paper, they might complain to their hairdresser...
But, good on you for respecting private rights.

THIS is why something needs to happen >>

"The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means. The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.
(Mohamed Akram, An Explanatory Memorandum on the Strategic Goal for the Group in North America, May 22. 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, U.S. vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al. 7 (21).
 
It's simply more tolerating of the intolerant.

Still, I'd rather live this way since it's a choice and that frees the owner to make their own choice.

In the country where the intolerant came from?

There's not much tolerance there.
An owner in a heavily Muslim area may decide it is best for business to remove signage they find offensive

It is up to the business to decide

I think that is key to this story. This town has a large Muslim population, so it wasn't just about this one woman. From a business standpoint, if the restaurant relies on Muslims for business, then this was a reasonable business decision.
 
Radical islam is dangerous. But what we need to do is be vigilant that no religion gets to make laws solely based on their dogma. Remember to keep a separation between church & state. That will keep Sharia law out of the US.
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.

The complainant does not have the right to put her wishes above that of the community, who have the right to see the sign, and whose standards do not include restrictions against pork products. She also does not have the right to put her anti-American cultural fascism above the rights of the business owner, to display the sign as he wishes.
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.

The complainant does not have the right to put her wishes above that of the community, who have the right to see the sign, and whose standards do not include restrictions against pork products. She also does not have the right to put her anti-American cultural fascism above the rights of the business owner, to display the sign as he wishes.
How was she doing all that?
She had an opinion and she voiced it...that's her right in a free society.
In the same free society you have the right to agree or disagree with her and voice your opinion accordingly.
Congratulations - you've exercised your right.
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.

The complainant does not have the right to put her wishes above that of the community, who have the right to see the sign, and whose standards do not include restrictions against pork products. She also does not have the right to put her anti-American cultural fascism above the rights of the business owner, to display the sign as he wishes.
How was she doing all that?
She had an opinion and she voiced it...that's her right in a free society.
In the same free society you have the right to agree or disagree with her and voice your opinion accordingly.
Congratulations - you've exercised your right.

YOU KNOW how she was doing that. She did more than voice an "opinion". She called the sign "insensitive" and "offensive". The sign was neither of those things. It was simply an ordinary sign with a manifestation of American culture. This woman had the gall to insist that her goofball Muslim culture should be supreme over American culture. She imposed her anti-pork Muslim culture upon the pork-accepting culture of the community. If she wasn't such an Islamist, she would have just accepted the sign as another example of American culture, which she should accept if she wants to live in America.. She just got lucky that the store owner was a dumbbell, who agreed with her pushy demand, and even was stupid enough to apologize. It is the woman who a owes the store owner an apology.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When in America, do as the Americans do. If you can't handle that, than don't come here to begin with. If you're already here, LEAVE. And don't look back.

This woman would be quick to bitch if she were in an Islamic country, and an American woman were walking around without wearing a headscarf.
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.

The complainant does not have the right to put her wishes above that of the community, who have the right to see the sign, and whose standards do not include restrictions against pork products. She also does not have the right to put her anti-American cultural fascism above the rights of the business owner, to display the sign as he wishes.
How was she doing all that?
She had an opinion and she voiced it...that's her right in a free society.
In the same free society you have the right to agree or disagree with her and voice your opinion accordingly.
Congratulations - you've exercised your right.

YOU KNOW how she was doing that. She did more than voice an "opinion". She called the sign "insensitive" and "offensive". The sign was neither of those things. It was simply an ordinary sign with a manifestation of American culture. This woman had the gall to insist that her goofball Muslim culture should be supreme over American culture. She imposed her anti-pork Muslim culture upon the pork-accepting culture of the community. If she wasn't such an Islamist, she would have just accepted the sign as another example of American culture, which she should accept if she wants to live in America.. She just got lucky that the store owner was a dumbbell, who agreed with her pushy demand, and even was stupid enough to apologize. It is the woman who a owes the store owner an apology.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When in America, do as the Americans do. If you can't handle that, than don't come here to begin with. If you're already here, LEAVE. And don't look back.

This woman would be quick to bitch if she were in an Islamic country, and an American woman were walking around without wearing a headscarf.
How does she have the power to 'impose her Muslim culture' on anyone?
She said what she thought, you disagree - hooray for free speech eh?
 
The right-wing outrage over this is the real story.
You're saying the right wing are the only ones concerned about Islamization in America ? That's not being too kind to the intelligence of the left-wing.
It's not being too kind to the right-wing hypocrisy over denying the rights of the complainant and the business owner.

The complainant does not have the right to put her wishes above that of the community, who have the right to see the sign, and whose standards do not include restrictions against pork products. She also does not have the right to put her anti-American cultural fascism above the rights of the business owner, to display the sign as he wishes.
How was she doing all that?
She had an opinion and she voiced it...that's her right in a free society.
In the same free society you have the right to agree or disagree with her and voice your opinion accordingly.
Congratulations - you've exercised your right.

YOU KNOW how she was doing that. She did more than voice an "opinion". She called the sign "insensitive" and "offensive". The sign was neither of those things. It was simply an ordinary sign with a manifestation of American culture. This woman had the gall to insist that her goofball Muslim culture should be supreme over American culture. She imposed her anti-pork Muslim culture upon the pork-accepting culture of the community. If she wasn't such an Islamist, she would have just accepted the sign as another example of American culture, which she should accept if she wants to live in America.. She just got lucky that the store owner was a dumbbell, who agreed with her pushy demand, and even was stupid enough to apologize. It is the woman who a owes the store owner an apology.

When in Rome, do as the Romans do. When in America, do as the Americans do. If you can't handle that, than don't come here to begin with. If you're already here, LEAVE. And don't look back.

This woman would be quick to bitch if she were in an Islamic country, and an American woman were walking around without wearing a headscarf.
How does she have the power to 'impose her Muslim culture' on anyone?
She said what she thought, you disagree - hooray for free speech eh?

You saw how. The store owner took the sign down didn't he ? You know, we didn't really hear the whole story of this. Some of it wasn't reported, but there are countless examples of Islamization, where Muslims have used the threat of lawsuits, "bigot" smear campaigns, and even physical (terrorism) violence, to insure that the Muslim way wins out. That could possibly have played a part in this too. I wouldn't doubt it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top