Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deputies escort dismissed George Zimmerman juror from courthouse | News - Home
yup he is a progressive
What do photos of Trayvon have to do with anything at all? I've noticed that the haters have posted photos as though they have some bearing on the evidence.
They don't.
OTOH, his age does.
By law, he was a child who was attacked by an adult man who went out hunting for someone to shoot. If he was not hunting for a victim, he would have had a loaded gun in his pocket. Earlier, I used the word "murder" and, to my knowledge, that is the definition of murder.
Others have said they know more about the law than I do and I don't doubt that's true. Instead of the asssssinine and childish name calling, how about if one of the"legal eagles", the self-proclaimed authorities on criminal law say why this is not murder and, for that matter, in the first degree.
This is what I based my opinion on:
first degree murder legal definition of first degree murder. first degree murder synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.
First Degree Murder Law & Legal Definition
You keep saying he was out hunting for someone to shoot....like you know what was in his head. Which you have no proof of.....you're just guessing like everyone else is.
That's not true. I do not say ONLY that Zimmerman was out hunting for someone to shoot. I've been very clear as to my reason for saying that. See the PROOF above.
What do photos of Trayvon have to do with anything at all? I've noticed that the haters have posted photos as though they have some bearing on the evidence.
They don't.
OTOH, his age does.
By law, he was a child who was attacked by an adult man who went out hunting for someone to shoot. If he was not hunting for a victim, he would have had a loaded gun in his pocket. Earlier, I used the word "murder" and, to my knowledge, that is the definition of murder.
Others have said they know more about the law than I do and I don't doubt that's true. Instead of the asssssinine and childish name calling, how about if one of the"legal eagles", the self-proclaimed authorities on criminal law say why this is not murder and, for that matter, in the first degree.
This is what I based my opinion on:
first degree murder legal definition of first degree murder. first degree murder synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.
First Degree Murder Law & Legal Definition
The term "child" was used to imply that Treyvon wasn't dangerous, or even to imply that he was "innocent," as in "uncorrupted." Nothing could be further from the truth. He may not have been a legal adult, but he certain was no child, and he certain wasn't "innocent."
No.
Because of his age, he was a child.
Doesn't really matter any more than the photos of him smoking flipping off - he was hunted and murdered.
And, although I realize there are "hate crime" laws, it also doesn't really matter whether Zimmerman is a racist. He loaded his gun, put it in his pocket and went hunting. He found someone to follow, harass and kill.
A very sad part of this crime is that it was ignored, buried and forgotten until Trayvon's mother made a stink. Lots of people are murdered every year and the killed never even arrested. It cannot be denied and shouldn't be ignored that most of the time, the killer who walks is white and the dead person is not.
If the killer is black and the dead person is white - suddenly its a crime worth investigating and trying.
Its just the way it is in the home of free where all men are created equal.
I think he lied under oath but they don't want to complicate the case by prosecuting him.
I suppose he might have. The fact that someone would do that shows how off the charts stupid this country is getting.
The more and more I watch this trial and this situation the more I believe that the best thing that could happen to Zimmerman would be to go to jail. I firmly believe that if he is freed, he will be killed by some racist vigilante.
How in hell can you say these things not even knowing what really happened? How do you know what really happened?? What is wrong with you??
I think he lied under oath but they don't want to complicate the case by prosecuting him.
I suppose he might have. The fact that someone would do that shows how off the charts stupid this country is getting.
The more and more I watch this trial and this situation the more I believe that the best thing that could happen to Zimmerman would be to go to jail. I firmly believe that if he is freed, he will be killed by some racist vigilante.
He wouldn't live a week in jail before he was shanked. He needs to skip the country or he's dead.
You keep saying he was out hunting for someone to shoot....like you know what was in his head. Which you have no proof of.....you're just guessing like everyone else is.
That's not true. I do not say ONLY that Zimmerman was out hunting for someone to shoot. I've been very clear as to my reason for saying that. See the PROOF above.
Where is the PROOF that Zimmerman was out to hunt Trayvon or anyone else down and murder him?? There isn't any.....
The term "child" was used to imply that Treyvon wasn't dangerous, or even to imply that he was "innocent," as in "uncorrupted." Nothing could be further from the truth. He may not have been a legal adult, but he certain was no child, and he certain wasn't "innocent."
No.
Because of his age, he was a child.
Doesn't really matter any more than the photos of him smoking flipping off - he was hunted and murdered.
And, although I realize there are "hate crime" laws, it also doesn't really matter whether Zimmerman is a racist. He loaded his gun, put it in his pocket and went hunting. He found someone to follow, harass and kill.
A very sad part of this crime is that it was ignored, buried and forgotten until Trayvon's mother made a stink. Lots of people are murdered every year and the killed never even arrested. It cannot be denied and shouldn't be ignored that most of the time, the killer who walks is white and the dead person is not.
If the killer is black and the dead person is white - suddenly its a crime worth investigating and trying.
Its just the way it is in the home of free where all men are created equal.
Wrong. 17-years-old is not a child. Someone about to graduate from high-school is not a child. You want to use that term because it has certain connotations. None of them apply to Treyvon Martin. He was a juvenile thug, almost an adult.
Wrong. He was a thug who got what he deserved for assaulting an innocent man.
Wrong. 17-years-old is not a child. Someone about to graduate from high-school is not a child. You want to use that term because it has certain connotations. None of them apply to Treyvon Martin. He was a juvenile thug, almost an adult.
At the age of 17, you are a minor. That's a child.
Wrong. He was a thug who got what he deserved for assaulting an innocent man.
I wasn't aware you had firsthand information about this case. Have you been in contact with Zimmerman's defense attorney?
Zimmerman admitted to shooting someone. You took the flying leap of assuming he's a murderer. I'd say you're the one playing games. Either that or you are exceedingly ignorant of what "murderer" means. The questions that followed your outlandish statement were the same questions that instantly occurred to me as well.Zimmerman isn't a cop.
Irrelevant. Is it your opinion that anyone (other than a cop) who kills another person, is a murderer?
I hate the dishonest and cowardly practice of cherry picking only part of a conversation in order to lie and twist poster's meaning. That's not what I said and both you and SickSteve (who lied about my words above) know it.
Since you say you're a "legal eagle", why do you resort to playing games?
Have a nice day.
Wrong. 17-years-old is not a child. Someone about to graduate from high-school is not a child. You want to use that term because it has certain connotations. None of them apply to Treyvon Martin. He was a juvenile thug, almost an adult.
At the age of 17, you are a minor. That's a child.
No it isn't. When you go to the movies, a "child" is defined as someone 12 or under. No one calls a 17-year-old a "child" - unless, that is, they are sleazy demagogues trying to put one over on the public.
Wrong. He was a thug who got what he deserved for assaulting an innocent man.
I wasn't aware you had firsthand information about this case. Have you been in contact with Zimmerman's defense attorney?
Almost all the evidence is publicly available, and it isn't nearly sufficient for a conviction. It shouldn't have even justified an indictment.
NC-17 No One 17 and Under Admitted. An NC-17 rated motion picture is one that, in the view of the Rating Board, most parents would consider patently too adult for their children 17 and under. No children will be admitted. NC-17 does not mean "obscene" or "pornographic" in the common or legal meaning of those words, and should not be construed as a negative judgment in any sense. The rating simply signals that the content is appropriate only for an adult audience. An NC-17 rating can be based on violence, sex, aberrational behavior, drug abuse or any other element that most parents would consider too strong and therefore off-limits for viewing by their children
.....
I can't speak the Trayvon Martin pics but the Bush pics are not doctored
You should change your screen name, dude. You are a dishonest person. That is patently obvious to any sane person reading this thread.
.....
I can't speak the Trayvon Martin pics but the Bush pics are not doctored
You should change your screen name, dude. You are a dishonest person. That is patently obvious to any sane person reading this thread.
You trying to say Bush didn't flip the bird?
You should change your screen name, dude. You are a dishonest person. That is patently obvious to any sane person reading this thread.
You trying to say Bush didn't flip the bird?
Give it a rest and put it in context
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDTFJbTm46w]Bush Flips Off America - YouTube[/ame]
Deputies escort dismissed George Zimmerman juror from courthouse | News - Home
yup he is a progressive
No it isn't. When you go to the movies, a "child" is defined as someone 12 or under. No one calls a 17-year-old a "child" - unless, that is, they are sleazy demagogues trying to put one over on the public.
I suppose he might have. The fact that someone would do that shows how off the charts stupid this country is getting.
The more and more I watch this trial and this situation the more I believe that the best thing that could happen to Zimmerman would be to go to jail. I firmly believe that if he is freed, he will be killed by some racist vigilante.
He wouldn't live a week in jail before he was shanked. He needs to skip the country or he's dead.
He won't be going to jail. If there are any white people on the jury, there is no way in hell the prosecution can make these bogus, trumped up charges stick.
