Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How old do you have to be before you can vote in the United States?
18 years old. And yeah.....................if the laws are still current from when I turned 18, that's also the time that you have to register for the Selective Service.
I didn't have to worry about the Selective Service thing..................I was in boot camp about 3 days after I'd turned 18.
Then I wonder, if you are an adult at the age of 17, as Trayvon was, why wasn't he deemed adult enough to be registered to vote?
If you can't legally vote, you are not an adult.
How old do you have to be before you can vote in the United States?
18 years old. And yeah.....................if the laws are still current from when I turned 18, that's also the time that you have to register for the Selective Service.
I didn't have to worry about the Selective Service thing..................I was in boot camp about 3 days after I'd turned 18.
Then I wonder, if you are an adult at the age of 17, as Trayvon was, why wasn't he deemed adult enough to be registered to vote?
If you can't legally vote, you are not an adult.
The whole world knows Zimmerman is guilty of planning to commit murder but if he gets off, it could turn out like the OJ Simpson debacle.
Notice the ad for the smart phone "Zimmerman app". What a bizarre circus.
What a stupid reason to dismiss him. So he posted on Facebook to a status about 'Justice For Trayvon'. Does this mean to suggest that if a juror had posted on Facebook that they believed Zimmerman was in the right that they would get on the jury?
Quite the opposite. A person who expressing an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accused on facebook or upon another internet forum would not be allowed to sit on the jury.
Just because someone has formed an opinion does not necessarily mean they can't listen to all the facts and make a judgement based on those facts.
True enough, but still a reason to have them dismissed. This particular case seems way beyond that scenario however. Have you seen his facebook post on the case?
In Sanford & I CAN tell you THIS. Justice IS COMING! & Ill tell you why. The ONLY reason this corrupt CITY Police dept. was stonewalling was because since they KNOWINGLY worked with this Self-appointed Neighborhood Watch Security & KNEW he carried a weapon They knew they AND the Homeowners Association were Liable for HUGE $$$ damages in court MINUTES after the shooting occurred. with the noise WE made it couldnt be covered up. I only hope the Feds go farther than just THIS case in investigating This Police Force. The Seminole County Justice System needs an ENEMA .& they just MIGHT GET one!
Dismissing someone because of a Facebook post. Laughable.
Actually necessary to instill at the very least an appearance of fairness.... and to ensure he does not give the judge an enema
The goofy far left and the deviant reactionary right have all made up their collective hive minds.
Come on, folks, let the process work itself out.
18 years old. And yeah.....................if the laws are still current from when I turned 18, that's also the time that you have to register for the Selective Service.
I didn't have to worry about the Selective Service thing..................I was in boot camp about 3 days after I'd turned 18.
Then I wonder, if you are an adult at the age of 17, as Trayvon was, why wasn't he deemed adult enough to be registered to vote?
If you can't legally vote, you are not an adult.
So thats set in stone huh? And who came up with this number?
Maybe you could claim trayvon was a child based on his behavior. Because an adult wouldnt have attacked someone the way he did. They would have called the police.
Then I wonder, if you are an adult at the age of 17, as Trayvon was, why wasn't he deemed adult enough to be registered to vote?
If you can't legally vote, you are not an adult.
So thats set in stone huh? And who came up with this number?
Maybe you could claim trayvon was a child based on his behavior. Because an adult wouldnt have attacked someone the way he did. They would have called the police.
Trayvon was being followed by Zimmerman. Zimmerman should have waited in his car instead of trying to play hero.
So thats set in stone huh? And who came up with this number?
Maybe you could claim trayvon was a child based on his behavior. Because an adult wouldnt have attacked someone the way he did. They would have called the police.
Trayvon was being followed by Zimmerman. Zimmerman should have waited in his car instead of trying to play hero.
going to have to come up with more then that
if you want him hung from the nearest pole
Then I wonder, if you are an adult at the age of 17, as Trayvon was, why wasn't he deemed adult enough to be registered to vote?
If you can't legally vote, you are not an adult.
So thats set in stone huh? And who came up with this number?
Maybe you could claim trayvon was a child based on his behavior. Because an adult wouldnt have attacked someone the way he did. They would have called the police.
Trayvon was being followed by Zimmerman. Zimmerman should have waited in his car instead of trying to play hero.
Prosecution will argue that Zimmerman's forced "retreat" does not empower to use deadly force in defense, once he had begun a chain of related events.
Prosecution will argue that Zimmerman's forced "retreat" does not empower to use deadly force in defense, once he had begun a chain of related events.
They could argue it all they want. They would be wrong.
So thats set in stone huh? And who came up with this number?
Maybe you could claim trayvon was a child based on his behavior. Because an adult wouldnt have attacked someone the way he did. They would have called the police.
Trayvon was being followed by Zimmerman. Zimmerman should have waited in his car instead of trying to play hero.
Travyon jumped Zimmerman while he was going back to his car.
And even if he had been following Trayvon, he still has the right to defend himself when he is jumped from behind
Trayvon was being followed by Zimmerman. Zimmerman should have waited in his car instead of trying to play hero.
Travyon jumped Zimmerman while he was going back to his car.
And even if he had been following Trayvon, he still has the right to defend himself when he is jumped from behind
Actually, if Zimmerman would have stayed in his car when he'd offered to follow Martin while talking to a 911 operator and was told "we don't need you to do that", not only would he not be in the mess he's currently in, but Travon Martin might still be alive.
Sorry.......................but if you start following me, and I recognize that you're following me in your car, and then I see you get out and then you come up and confront me, I'm gonna be a bit defensive as well. If you step to me in a belligerent way, I'm going to greet you with my best defense (which may involve kicking your ass when you get in arm's reach of me).
Trayvon had to know he was being followed, because he went into a gated community. The path that he took was also pretty consistent with him trying to get rid of someone.
Sorry......................but Zimmerman followed Martin without just (or probable) cause, and was told to not do anything by the police.
When all is said and done, I'm hoping that the jury sees what happened, and convicts Zimmerman of manslaughter (at the least), or murder, because he didn't need to follow Martin.
What a stupid reason to dismiss him. So he posted on Facebook to a status about 'Justice For Trayvon'. Does this mean to suggest that if a juror had posted on Facebook that they believed Zimmerman was in the right that they would get on the jury?
Just because someone has formed an opinion does not necessarily mean they can't listen to all the facts and make a judgement based on those facts.
Dismissing someone because of a Facebook post. Laughable.
A prospective juror in the George Zimmerman case was excused Monday after he admitted donating $20 to Zimmerman's online legal defense fund.
Deputies escort dismissed George Zimmerman juror from courthouse | News - Home
yup he is a progressive
What a stupid reason to dismiss him. So he posted on Facebook to a status about 'Justice For Trayvon'. Does this mean to suggest that if a juror had posted on Facebook that they believed Zimmerman was in the right that they would get on the jury?
Just because someone has formed an opinion does not necessarily mean they can't listen to all the facts and make a judgement based on those facts.
Dismissing someone because of a Facebook post. Laughable.