Diversity Is Not A Strength

diversity is quite usually a strength

diversity of portfolio
diversity in diet
diversity in thoughts and ideas
diversity in biology
diversity in music and movies
diversity in your reading and studies
diversity in the types of people you congregate with


theres 1 place i can think of where its not a strength....

prison.
Funny you should mention prison. Prison is a forced microcosm, that quite aptly shows, at an accelerated rate, the inevitable result of cultural, and racial diversity.

I don't think it's a valid comparison. Prison is an artificial environment forcing people of the same gender, into environment with no diversity or natural life.
Ohhh there's diversity. And believe me, no melting pot fantasy is taking place behind those walls...
Of course there isn't. It's artificial.
Most people self segregate outside prison too. Don't mistake the comingling you see in society that is forced through legal mandates, as a willing participation in the diversity experiment. If that were true half the laws regarding workers rights, renters rights, banking, and loan regulations, and brown vs board of education would never exist.
 
Yeah, diversity is terrible. The U.S. didn't become the lone word superpower because it welcomed immigrants of all faiths, races, and backgrounds, after all.

:rolleyes:

Prior to the 1965 plan to end America, what you claim is utterly false.

Germany is European
Italy is European
Ireland is European

See a trend to prior immigration, sparky?
And do you recall the rhetoric that was aimed at Irish and Italian immigrants?

Some things never change.
 
What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius


Even if diversity is not a strength, assimilation is theft. That's worse.
 
If diversity is an asset, Brazil should be one of the wealthiest countries and Iceland one of the poorest.

I was a bit confused by the mention of Brazil. I've seen some documentaries on Brazil, and they seem to be the least racist, and most wealthy and integrated society around.

I don't see their example as being bad.
 
Beauty is subjective how do you qualify it; how much value does it have. No diversity is not strength it is just variety. Strength is unity. It is unity that that makes a nation strong. There is nothing wrong with diversity as long as it doesn’t harm a country’s wealth or security. It is unity that makes a nation strong unfortunately that is something this country is losing. We will regret the loss American unity in the next generation or so when we come in conflict with the Russians. But on the bright side my grandchildren will be able to pass as Russians.
 
Beauty is subjective how do you qualify it; how much value does it have. No diversity is not strength it is just variety. Strength is unity. It is unity that that makes a nation strong. There is nothing wrong with diversity as long as it doesn’t harm a country’s wealth or security. It is unity that makes a nation strong unfortunately that is something this country is losing. We will regret the loss American unity in the next generation or so when we come in conflict with the Russians. But on the bright side my grandchildren will be able to pass as Russians.
Beauty, did you say? Russian girls are definitely hotter than Americans. By the way, also variance equals energy, so the more variance a society has the more energy it has for its survival.
 
What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius


Even if diversity is not a strength, assimilation is theft. That's worse.


Assimilation is not 'theft'. Assimilation is what allows people groups to co-exist and work together.
 
What follows is a rather simple explaination, as to why the perpetuated lie that "diversity is our strength"; is not a strength at all. But rather a liability.


You have power over your mind - not outside events. Realize this, and you will find strength.
Marcus Aurelius


Even if diversity is not a strength, assimilation is theft. That's worse.


Assimilation is not 'theft'. Assimilation is what allows people groups to co-exist and work together.


Coexist and work together? With assimilation it is like you coexist and work together with the Maffia that has killed one of your children, so now you are eager to assimilate some more and work with them so that they don't kill the other one too.
 
Tommy thinks that Western Europe is more advanced than Eastern Europe.

Now, why is that?

Western Europe chose colonialism, and Eastern Europe had Jews, Gypsies, and Communism.

Now, why oh why did Western Europe rise, and Eastern Europe fall behind?
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)
 
If diversity is an asset, Brazil should be one of the wealthiest countries and Iceland one of the poorest.

I was a bit confused by the mention of Brazil. I've seen some documentaries on Brazil, and they seem to be the least racist, and most wealthy and integrated society around.

I don't see their example as being bad.

Brazil has horrible slums, and a high murder rate.
 
Tommy thinks that Western Europe is more advanced than Eastern Europe.

Now, why is that?

Western Europe chose colonialism, and Eastern Europe had Jews, Gypsies, and Communism.

Now, why oh why did Western Europe rise, and Eastern Europe fall behind?
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.
 
Tommy thinks that Western Europe is more advanced than Eastern Europe.

Now, why is that?

Western Europe chose colonialism, and Eastern Europe had Jews, Gypsies, and Communism.

Now, why oh why did Western Europe rise, and Eastern Europe fall behind?
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.

What re-divide is this?
Western Europe divided the their World over racism?
 
Yeah, diversity is terrible. The U.S. didn't become the lone word superpower because it welcomed immigrants of all faiths, races, and backgrounds, after all.

:rolleyes:

Prior to the 1965 plan to end America, what you claim is utterly false.

Germany is European
Italy is European
Ireland is European

See a trend to prior immigration, sparky?
And do you recall the rhetoric that was aimed at Irish and Italian immigrants?

Some things never change.

I'm glad I moved away from Putnam Lake NY, to Pawling NY.

It's better here, there's less Italians here.

Italians kind of suck, touchy, fussy, unfriendly, aggressive peoples in comparison to Northern Europeans.
 
Tommy thinks that Western Europe is more advanced than Eastern Europe.

Now, why is that?

Western Europe chose colonialism, and Eastern Europe had Jews, Gypsies, and Communism.

Now, why oh why did Western Europe rise, and Eastern Europe fall behind?
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.

What re-divide is this?
Western Europe divided the their World over racism?

France and Britain divided the world in 1945. To keep this division going forever, especially in Eastern Europe, they invented racism. Too bad, their former colonies in Asia and Africa reacted faster, and they had to tune down domestically. But only domestically.
 
Tommy thinks that Western Europe is more advanced than Eastern Europe.

Now, why is that?

Western Europe chose colonialism, and Eastern Europe had Jews, Gypsies, and Communism.

Now, why oh why did Western Europe rise, and Eastern Europe fall behind?
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.

What re-divide is this?
Western Europe divided the their World over racism?

France and Britain divided the world in 1945. To keep this division going forever, especially in Eastern Europe, they invented racism. Too bad, their former colonies in Asia and Africa reacted faster, and they had to tune down domestically. But only domestically.

How did racism start in 1945?
Furthermore, what division of the World by French, and English?
 
probably because of people like you.

Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.

What re-divide is this?
Western Europe divided the their World over racism?

France and Britain divided the world in 1945. To keep this division going forever, especially in Eastern Europe, they invented racism. Too bad, their former colonies in Asia and Africa reacted faster, and they had to tune down domestically. But only domestically.

How did racism start in 1945?
Furthermore, what division of the World by French, and English?

They re drew the map of Europe. Only racism can keep that map going to this day.
 
Eastern Europeans are about as racist today as 100 years ago, or 1,000 years ago.

Western Europeans on the other hand went from like 90% racist, to like 90% anti-racist, in just a few decades.
(It really comes off like that of the actions of retards.)

But it is not Eastern Europe that re divided the world but Western Europe did.

What re-divide is this?
Western Europe divided the their World over racism?

France and Britain divided the world in 1945. To keep this division going forever, especially in Eastern Europe, they invented racism. Too bad, their former colonies in Asia and Africa reacted faster, and they had to tune down domestically. But only domestically.

How did racism start in 1945?
Furthermore, what division of the World by French, and English?

They re drew the map of Europe. Only racism can keep that map going to this day.

More like cheap labor profits to the elites, made the elites import in third-World riff-raffs, as justification, they had to brainwash the masses into a tolerant stupor.
 

Forum List

Back
Top