Do democrat voters actually believe the democrats actually care about them?

[JQPublic1]

Oh.......that was a transfer......NOT SPENDING. If the country is in debt where do you think those billions came from?????
*Look in the mirror* Hint Hint*

The 1.7 billion in question came from Iran as payment for services or military hardware that was never delivered. In any event, the transferred funds are not taxpayer's money and do not effect the national debt. But here is the kicker. UN member nations still control more than 100 billion of Iranian assets. Should they renege on the Obama deal they will never see any of it. And, the concessions Iran agreed to in the deal were
satisfactory to the UN members whose countries are in close proximity to Iran.

Congress didn't authorize it. Period. It funded terrorism for years. Iran was able to buy some really expensive weapons with those billions that you and I paid for, and are currently paying interest on.

Permission from Congress was obviously not necessary in returning assets to a foreign entity. The funds were not US property. Obama operated within the purview of the UN whereas he legally, and deftly, sidestepped a hostile obstructionist RW Congress. Brilliant!

God hates a liar and thief (Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, Hillary & Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Elizabeth Pocahontas Warren, Dingy Harry Reid, The DNC, Debra Blabbermouth Schultz, Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow and the rest of the corrupt media)

So......just sayin....

You forgot the Liar In Chief: Donald J. Trump.
He and his populist constituents make lying a pernicious art form.

Oh....you trust the UN???
You sure are naive.

I worked with the UN back in 93 in Somalia under UNISOM. I wouldn't trust those idiots to do the right thing if YOUR life depended on it, much less mine. My guess is the $160 billion that Iran got from us was the UN funds. BTW, where do you think the UN got that money from? They sure as hell didn't get it from any Arab countries. It came from the US Treasury. The UN is located in NYC. We pay most of the rent to allow those bastards to vote against us on every issue.

Once again.....you must be a Dimocrap, because you never learn from history and you're too easily misled. Iranians broke into our embassy, took our people hostage, and have been killing our people since 1978. What makes you feel they deserve to be paid for killing thousands of our soldiers?

You trust Trump? You are not just naive you are conscientiously stupid. I think I would trust the UN to do the right thing before trusting Trump or the GOP to do the right thing.

You worked with the UN back in1993? Hmmmm I guess back then they were idiots to have accepted the likes of you into their ranks. Hopefully, they have recovered from your presence by now.

Where did you get that 160 billion figure, snowflake? I've seen references to sums between 400 million and 1.9 billion in unfrozen assets but nothing close to160 billion. Total assets frozen by UN members might approach that figure but most of those funds are frozen for reasons not connected to the Iranian nuclear program. Iran won't be able to access that money.
You contend that Iran has been hostile to the USA since, presumably, the Shah was ousted. That might be true considering the Shah was little more than a tyrannical US patsy. That would certainly be a prime cause of disaffection towards the USA by those who forced his abdication.
But I am afraid you don't understand the
dynamics of the Iranian revolution. The takeover of the U.S. embassy in Tehran(1979) was not a government venture. Students did that. I am not sure a government existed at that point in time.

Consider too that Iranians have not forgotten how the CIA reinstalled the estranged Iranian monarch in1953 after that tyrant was forced to abdicate.

But the Iranian government has not yet been proven to have terrorist connections to a few Iranian radicals operating independently of the government. You can't pin any killings done by radicals on the government but I knew you would try.

 

[JQPublic1]

When will the moron in our WH going to rip up that Iran deal?? Wasn't it supposed to happen on day one??

No.....mainly because Obama frontloaded all of the benefits to Iran. (This was by design) Completely backing out now does nothing to help our position. Iran made the deal because Obama gave them everything. Billions in cash, ending sanctions so they could buy weapons with that cash, and no guarantees other than Irans word. They swear they aren't still developing nukes,.....even though they requested tons of Uranium earier this year. Eventually they will be a more dangerous N. Korea (N. Korea has nukes now...No thanks to Bill and Hillary)

UN member nations, some having more stake in preventing Iranian nuclear weapons, depend on reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency, a watchdog arm of the UN. Operating under the auspices of the IEASA, UN inspectors confirm that Iran is compliant with the Obama deal.
U.N. watchdog: Iran nuclear deal appears to be working so far, but inspectors are ‘stretched’

The report does verify that Iran is using some uranium for domestic use but none for constructing weapons.

/---- On September 30, 1938, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, French Premier Edouard Daladier, and British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain sign the Munich Pact, which seals the fate of Czechoslovakia, virtually handing it over to Germany in the name of peace. Upon return to Britain, Chamberlain would declare that the meeting had achieved “peace in our time.” How did that work out Spanky?
View attachment 124529

Your analogy doesn't quite compute. Obama's deal was not an appeasement. Instead it was a classic use of diplomacy.
Chamberlain was an appeaser who, fearing the might of Hitler, capitulated on key issues.
Indeed Chamberlain's concessions only emboldened the NAZIs who conceeded virtually nothing in return. Obama's deal OTOH
required concessions by Iran with oversight by the UN.

Yeah.....appeasement or capitulation. Whatever the you want to call it.
Obama wants to set up a rouge nation with nukes so they can close down the Persian Gulf and gut oil production in the Middle-East. Oh....and he wants to kill Jews and Christians.

This is just an example of what happens when you have a crazy Communist SOB in the White House. You never put a lying asshole in there that likes to rub elbows with terrorists and criminals. Obama gave the Democrats alot of what they want, but he also risks destroying the Democratic Party for the foreseeable future. They're out of touch and have lost the Middle-Class almost completely.

You need to tune Alex Jones out. He is destroying your mind.

 

[TheDude]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

 

[JQPublic1]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

/---- For decades, the Democratic party has pushed policies that have turned America’s inner cites into islands of profound impoverishment — neighborhoods where shattered families are often housed, doctored, educated, and fed by bureaucrats.
There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.

Below are seven truths about how the Democratic party’s policies are destroying America’s inner cities, all while taking the voters who live there for granted.
7 Ways Democrat Policies Are Killing America's Inner Cities

 

[JQPublic1]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

/---- For decades, the Democratic party has pushed policies that have turned America’s inner cites into islands of profound impoverishment — neighborhoods where shattered families are often housed, doctored, educated, and fed by bureaucrats.
There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.

Below are seven truths about how the Democratic party’s policies are destroying gAmerica’s inner cities, all while taking the voters who live there for granted.
7 Ways Democrat Policies Are Killing America's Inner Cities
View attachment 124719

Democrats aren't destroying inner cities. The onset of Urban decay in the wake of a dwindling tax base is the prime factor. When giant industries leave town, good paying jobs go with them. Those left behind for whatever reason have few choices: move, stay and commute. Staying means facing less police protection from maurading gangs and the Nixon induced drug trade. Still, many good people do stay, armed with little more than a steadfast faith in God to sustain them. But we rarely hear about those inner city dwellers until a Dylan Roof comes along.

Unions are often scapegoated for industrial failures in the inner cities. Democrats, you say, are the political force behind unions because they support collective bargaining, a causal factor in redistributing wealth that helped to create the middle-class.
Mismanagement and poor quality controls
Is never a consideration in assessing the demise of an inner city industry. The blame nearly always is placed on the demands of collective bargaining and, subsequently, the Democrats.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

/---- For decades, the Democratic party has pushed policies that have turned America’s inner cites into islands of profound impoverishment — neighborhoods where shattered families are often housed, doctored, educated, and fed by bureaucrats.
There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.

Below are seven truths about how the Democratic party’s policies are destroying gAmerica’s inner cities, all while taking the voters who live there for granted.
7 Ways Democrat Policies Are Killing America's Inner Cities
View attachment 124719

Democrats aren't destroying inner cities. The onset of Urban decay in the wake of a dwindling tax base is the prime factor. When giant industries leave town, good paying jobs go with them. Those left behind for whatever reason have few choices: move, stay and commute. Staying means facing less police protection from maurading gangs and the Nixon induced drug trade. Still, many good people do stay, armed with little more than a steadfast faith in God to sustain them. But we rarely hear about those inner city dwellers until a Dylan Roof comes along.

Unions are often scapegoated for industrial failures in the inner cities. Democrats, you say, are the political force behind unions because they support collective bargaining, a causal factor in redistributing wealth that helped to create the middle-class.
Mismanagement and poor quality controls
Is never a consideration in assessing the demise of an inner city industry. The blame nearly always is placed on the demands of collective bargaining and, subsequently, the Democrats.

/---- And those companies flee to business friendly states down south or over seas.

 

[Timmy]

This is funny . Implying that the GOP cares more for Americans . Virtually all gop talking points are about hating on someone! Women, minorities , non rich , immigrants , gays , you name it .

ALL their care about Is pleasing big biz masters . If somthing does help, it's an accidental by product .

 

[JQPublic1]

The Democrats certainly care more about the average guy than the Republicans do. Raising the minimum wage, the PPACA, Social Security Medicare,
Medicaid, workplace safety, and consumer protections are Democrat initiatives to take note of.

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

/---- For decades, the Democratic party has pushed policies that have turned America’s inner cites into islands of profound impoverishment — neighborhoods where shattered families are often housed, doctored, educated, and fed by bureaucrats.
There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.

Below are seven truths about how the Democratic party’s policies are destroying gAmerica’s inner cities, all while taking the voters who live there for granted.
7 Ways Democrat Policies Are Killing America's Inner Cities
View attachment 124719

Democrats aren't destroying inner cities. The onset of Urban decay in the wake of a dwindling tax base is the prime factor. When giant industries leave town, good paying jobs go with them. Those left behind for whatever reason have few choices: move, stay and commute. Staying means facing less police protection from maurading gangs and the Nixon induced drug trade. Still, many good people do stay, armed with little more than a steadfast faith in God to sustain them. But we rarely hear about those inner city dwellers until a Dylan Roof comes along.

Unions are often scapegoated for industrial failures in the inner cities. Democrats, you say, are the political force behind unions because they support collective bargaining, a causal factor in redistributing wealth that helped to create the middle-class.
Mismanagement and poor quality controls
Is never a consideration in assessing the demise of an inner city industry. The blame nearly always is placed on the demands of collective bargaining and, subsequently, the Democrats.

/---- And those companies flee to business friendly states down south or over seas.

Wherever they go the workers are going to get the shaft. That reality throws light on Trump's campaign promise to bring Those offshore jobs back home. He proposed the implementation of tariffs on products made abroad and sold here. But his plan to lower corporate tax rates would, in his judgment,
be a critical enticement. Yet labor costs, seemingly, would offset that incentive
Further, if by chance offshore businesses came back home in significant numbers, would that repatriation revitalize the inner cities?

 

[Cellblock2429]

/--- He'll certainly do more than Hildabeast would have. She'd keep offshoring iobs with higher taxes and more regs.

 

[edward37]

That only means they're cause and effect challenged. They don't realize they make things worse.

Cause and effect challenged? I don't think so.
Without the Democrats life would be harsher for most and downright unbearable for many.

/---- For decades, the Democratic party has pushed policies that have turned America’s inner cites into islands of profound impoverishment — neighborhoods where shattered families are often housed, doctored, educated, and fed by bureaucrats.
There’s a misery in many of America’s inner cities that projects perpetual poverty.

Below are seven truths about how the Democratic party’s policies are destroying gAmerica’s inner cities, all while taking the voters who live there for granted.
7 Ways Democrat Policies Are Killing America's Inner Cities
View attachment 124719

Democrats aren't destroying inner cities. The onset of Urban decay in the wake of a dwindling tax base is the prime factor. When giant industries leave town, good paying jobs go with them. Those left behind for whatever reason have few choices: move, stay and commute. Staying means facing less police protection from maurading gangs and the Nixon induced drug trade. Still, many good people do stay, armed with little more than a steadfast faith in God to sustain them. But we rarely hear about those inner city dwellers until a Dylan Roof comes along.

Unions are often scapegoated for industrial failures in the inner cities. Democrats, you say, are the political force behind unions because they support collective bargaining, a causal factor in redistributing wealth that helped to create the middle-class.
Mismanagement and poor quality controls
Is never a consideration in assessing the demise of an inner city industry. The blame nearly always is placed on the demands of collective bargaining and, subsequently, the Democrats.

/---- And those companies flee to business friendly states down south or over seas.

Wherever they go the workers are going to get the shaft. That reality throws light on Trump's campaign promise to bring Those offshore jobs back home. He proposed the implementation of tariffs on products made abroad and sold here. But his plan to lower corporate tax rates would, in his judgment,
be a critical enticement. Yet labor costs, seemingly, would offset that incentive
Further, if by chance offshore businesses came back home in significant numbers, would that repatriation revitalize the inner cities?

automation ,robots that do the work of 10 men that don't take holidays no health care no overtime pay are taking over

 

[edward37]

/--- He'll certainly do more than Hildabeast would have. She'd keep offshoring iobs with higher taxes and more regs.

tell me how all those off shore jobs coming back will convert into lower prices for all America and not much higher

 

[easyt65]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

 

[Cellblock2429]

/---- I guess you'd rather see people out of work or underemployed and on the Gubmint dole. Dems policies are abject failures so you want to double down on them.

 

[edward37]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

 

[Cellblock2429]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

/---- what makes it a tragedy besides flushing Obozo's legacy swirling down the toilet?

 

[easyt65]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

Democrats actually admitted they didn't read the ACA. I haven't heard any Republican say that yet about this bill...not that I doubt you. It is common practice, from what I have read, for the politicians to have their staff read the bills and brief them on it. (Maybe we should pay their staff members for doing the politicians' jobs?! )

 

[edward37]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

/---- what makes it a tragedy besides flushing Obozo's legacy swirling down the toilet?

you'll find out as soon as the senate relegates it to the garbage and draws up a new bill ,,,the bill is great for billionaires

 

[Cellblock2429]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

/---- what makes it a tragedy besides flushing Obozo's legacy swirling down the toilet?

you'll find out as soon as the senate relegates it to the garbage and draws up a new bill ,,,the bill is great for billionaires

/---- got anything besides class envy? Anything at all?

 

[edward37]

Libs still haven't read the ACA...

and no republican has read the travesty before the senate now

/---- what makes it a tragedy besides flushing Obozo's legacy swirling down the toilet?

you'll find out as soon as the senate relegates it to the garbage and draws up a new bill ,,,the bill is great for billionaires

/---- got anything besides class envy? Anything at all?

24K of AAPL for a few years,,,,,,,,for starters