Vandalshandle
Gold Member
- Jan 30, 2013
- 21,151
- 3,983
The OP is literally drizzling with that snobby, sneering, liberal elitist cold blood that keeps losing them elections. I'm a non-liberal, libertarian type from California (of all places) who's never been to the deep South and I still wish you South-hating liberal elitists would contract the terminal cancer of your choice.
I don't expect liberal brains (the size of the cherry Starburst I'm eating at this moment) to understand this, but the whole Union/Confederacy thing is a settled issue. Settled 150 years ago. It doesn't benefit ANYONE, in any part of this country, to keep rehashing it over and over and over again. It doesn't do any good for people living today, whether northern or southern. What do you liberals hope to accomplish with all your bellyaching about the South or especially the Midwest, which feeds your petulant, piety-spewing, punk mouths with the most gigantic agricultural industry in the history of mankind?
While you are right that the entire Confederacy thing is not relevant to anything, I don't see why you are so upset over the controversy. I am a Southerner, and don't care what people think about the Civil War. I am proud of my great grandfather's part in fighting for Tennessee, regardless of what people think. On the other hand, the confederate flag no longer has anything to do with the Civil War. It is now a symbol of racism.
While the Southern aristocracy was fighting for slavery, they had convinced the poor man in the South to fight for their state's independence and freedom from tyranny, which was, of course, just a manipulative tool for those whose economy was threatened by the end of slavery. Frankly, just like the Northerner, who did not want to die to free blacks, the Whites in the South would never have agreed to die to keep them enslaved. They had no use for blacks, one way or the other.