Do we know how many are here on stolen citizenships with full voting rights?

And won’t those voters always vote for whichever party promises to allow their mothers, fathers, aunts, uncles..etc etc to join them here to help them rob Americans blind?
Are those voters really casting votes to help make America a better nation for AMERICANS?
Does anyone really believe that our founders intended for citizenships to be stolen and voting rights granted with those stolen citizenships?

This may help come up with a number.
Illegal immigrants cited in theft of 39 million Social Security numbers


That is disturbing, but the fact is that other than a SS number, there are three other forms of federal identity (such as an ITIN), used in cases where someone is applying for citizenship, adopted, and other special cases. It can happen that various agencies are not properly notified or records not caught up, so not all instances where SS numbers don't match can automatically be declared as fraudulent.

That said, all of this could be solved, in a country concerned with election fraud, by simply invoking voter ID laws in all 50 states. I've yet to ever meet a person who didn't have one form of government photo ID. But for some reason, democrats are always AGAINST the idea.
Lots of older people don't have easy access to government ID.
Really? Produce a few. Not only do you need it for most everything, but older people were once younger. What was their excuse then? They had their whole life to get a government ID.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

HOUSTON — In his wallet, Anthony Settles carries an expired Texas identification card, his Social Security card and an old student ID from the University of Houston, where he studied math and physics decades ago. What he does not have is the one thing that he needs to vote this presidential election: a current Texas photo ID.

For Settles to get one of those, his name has to match his birth certificate — and it doesn’t. In 1964, when he was 14, his mother married and changed his last name. After Texas passed a new voter-ID law, officials told Settles he had to show them his name-change certificate from 1964 to qualify for a new identification card to vote.

So with the help of several lawyers, Settles tried to find it, searching records in courthouses in the D.C. area, where he grew up. But they could not find it. To obtain a new document changing his name to the one he has used for 51 years, Settles has to go to court, a process that would cost him more than $250 — more than he is willing to pay.

A federal court in Texas found that 608,470 registered voters don’t have the forms of identification that the state now requires for voting. For example, residents can vote with their concealed-carry handgun licenses but not their state-issued student university IDs.

Many of the residents struggling to obtain a valid photo ID are elderly and poor and were born in homes rather than hospitals. As a result, birth certificates were often lost or names were misspelled in official city records.

Hargie Randall, 72, was born in his family’s home in Huntsville, Tex., and has lived in the state his entire life. Randall, now living in Houston’s low-income Fifth Ward neighborhood, has several health problems and such poor eyesight that he is legally blind. He can’t drive and has to ask others for rides.

After Texas implemented its new law, Randall went to the Department of Public Safety (the Texas agency that handles driver’s licenses and identification cards) three times to try to get a photo ID to vote. Each time Randall was told he needed different items. First, he was told he needed three forms of identification. He came back and brought his Medicaid card, bills and a current voter registration card from voting in past elections.

But Myrtle Delahuerta, 85, who lives across town from Randall, has tried unsuccessfully for two years to get her ID. She has the same problem of her birth certificate not matching her pile of other legal documents that she carts from one government office to the next. The disabled woman, who has difficulty walking, is applying to have her name legally changed, a process that will cost her more than $300 and has required a background check and several trips to government offices.


Even if all this were true, dumbass, that is a matter to be resolved by the law-makers. Where are all your democrats???

ITMT, are you really going to suggest that this random sampling of people are all going to WANT to vote and will all be of just one party?

Such people can hire lawyers pro bono. Let them sue the state for denying them their constitutional rights.

Meantime, thanks for letting us know that over 7% of the voting population in Texas was born in a shack behind the house and cannot vote because they cannot even prove who they are and that all of therm are dumbass democrats too poor and idiotic to even get the situation resolved!
 
Diversity is putting chocolate into your milk and finding it better. Water not so much and we need not be forced to add orange juice just so we can snowflake virtue signal how diverse we are.
 


That is disturbing, but the fact is that other than a SS number, there are three other forms of federal identity (such as an ITIN), used in cases where someone is applying for citizenship, adopted, and other special cases. It can happen that various agencies are not properly notified or records not caught up, so not all instances where SS numbers don't match can automatically be declared as fraudulent.

That said, all of this could be solved, in a country concerned with election fraud, by simply invoking voter ID laws in all 50 states. I've yet to ever meet a person who didn't have one form of government photo ID. But for some reason, democrats are always AGAINST the idea.
Lots of older people don't have easy access to government ID.
Really? Produce a few. Not only do you need it for most everything, but older people were once younger. What was their excuse then? They had their whole life to get a government ID.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5474ec-20f0-11e6-8690-f14ca9de2972_story.html

HOUSTON — In his wallet, Anthony Settles carries an expired Texas identification card, his Social Security card and an old student ID from the University of Houston, where he studied math and physics decades ago. What he does not have is the one thing that he needs to vote this presidential election: a current Texas photo ID.

For Settles to get one of those, his name has to match his birth certificate — and it doesn’t. In 1964, when he was 14, his mother married and changed his last name. After Texas passed a new voter-ID law, officials told Settles he had to show them his name-change certificate from 1964 to qualify for a new identification card to vote.

So with the help of several lawyers, Settles tried to find it, searching records in courthouses in the D.C. area, where he grew up. But they could not find it. To obtain a new document changing his name to the one he has used for 51 years, Settles has to go to court, a process that would cost him more than $250 — more than he is willing to pay.

A federal court in Texas found that 608,470 registered voters don’t have the forms of identification that the state now requires for voting. For example, residents can vote with their concealed-carry handgun licenses but not their state-issued student university IDs.

Many of the residents struggling to obtain a valid photo ID are elderly and poor and were born in homes rather than hospitals. As a result, birth certificates were often lost or names were misspelled in official city records.

Hargie Randall, 72, was born in his family’s home in Huntsville, Tex., and has lived in the state his entire life. Randall, now living in Houston’s low-income Fifth Ward neighborhood, has several health problems and such poor eyesight that he is legally blind. He can’t drive and has to ask others for rides.

After Texas implemented its new law, Randall went to the Department of Public Safety (the Texas agency that handles driver’s licenses and identification cards) three times to try to get a photo ID to vote. Each time Randall was told he needed different items. First, he was told he needed three forms of identification. He came back and brought his Medicaid card, bills and a current voter registration card from voting in past elections.

But Myrtle Delahuerta, 85, who lives across town from Randall, has tried unsuccessfully for two years to get her ID. She has the same problem of her birth certificate not matching her pile of other legal documents that she carts from one government office to the next. The disabled woman, who has difficulty walking, is applying to have her name legally changed, a process that will cost her more than $300 and has required a background check and several trips to government offices.

Wow, you found two people.

Imagine that a federal court in Texas found that 608,470 registered voters don’t have the forms of identification that the state now requires for voting, but despite all that, between the fed and state, cannot resolve the matter much less indicate how many of those people actually TRIED or wanted to vote?

By the sounds of it, in another 2-5 years, half these people will have passed away anyway from old age, poverty, neglect from the Democrats and from all those trips back and forth in their bare feet to the government office!
 
he’s the poster child for the GOP. Pure hate

That loser does NOT represent the GOP.

that loser does represent a lot of the Trump wing of the GOP.

Fuck yes I do...I just let my nuts hang a bit more, I’m a bit more candid...that’s all.

You certainly do represent the nutjobs who support Trump.

Look, I aim to be viewed as a nutjob by all twisted LefTards...all good people do. If you despise us we know for fact we’re doing the right thing.

you’ve succeeded in making the board view you as a total retard.
 
Another one who needs to go is Pauly Shore, just on general principle.

6a00e54ee7b64288330168ec0aac8f970c-800wi.jpg
 


That is disturbing, but the fact is that other than a SS number, there are three other forms of federal identity (such as an ITIN), used in cases where someone is applying for citizenship, adopted, and other special cases. It can happen that various agencies are not properly notified or records not caught up, so not all instances where SS numbers don't match can automatically be declared as fraudulent.

That said, all of this could be solved, in a country concerned with election fraud, by simply invoking voter ID laws in all 50 states. I've yet to ever meet a person who didn't have one form of government photo ID. But for some reason, democrats are always AGAINST the idea.
The reason is that it's just one of many GOP strategies to make it harder for minorities to cast an honest vote that counts.

The reason is that it's just one of many GOP strategies to make it harder for minorities to cast an honest vote that counts.
BULL. Prove it. What is it about being less than 50% of the population (a minority) that automatically makes you unable to walk, unable to take a bus, unable to drive, unable to own a car, have no friends, can't call a cab, and was born poor and stupid?
What is the reason for making it more difficult for these people to vote?

Why would getting people to polls be the responsibility of father government?
Why would a party want people deciding our elections whom don’t have an iQ high enough to figure out how to get to the polls?

Because having as many people as possible voting is the backbone of our democracy


Fuck it, why not have 12 year olds vote?
The majority of those your Party Of Filth And Foreigners want voting aren't nearly as intelligent as a 5th grader.

12 year olds cannot legally vote

Why are you trying to block legal voters from casting ballots?
 

Forum List

Back
Top