Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He uses Trump as an example. Asinine argument. EVERYONE had a say in Trumps victory/loss. Only a handful of morons voted in Mr Island Tips Over. We need protection from them. Term limits is the only viable answer. People like him and Maxine Waters should never be allowed to remain in DC this long.We got so many before Trump though. Ginsberg is a perfect example. An ACLU graduate who was disqualified just for that. She won't even leave with dignity. The Progs are forcing her to not retire. To bad she doesn't have the medical care of the regular people.Going before "the people" is not a good safety net. A perfect example is that idiot who thought an island could TIP OVER if over populated. That moron plays a role in forming the laws ALL OF US must follow and his constituents were clearly as dumb as him. All Americans need protection from idiots like him.Do we need to create an amendment to force retirement for positions with lifetime appointments such as the supreme court?
This amendment would obviously take time to frame and pass so it would have no impact on Ginsburg so get that out of your head.
Other than using her as an example for her age and medical problems this topic is not directly about her.
There comes a point when missing oral arguments and other important duties required to serve as a justice becomes a problem. Many issues that come before the court deserve & maybe even demand the full attention of ALL of the justices. Votes should never come down to "going with the status quo" because you missed too much work to be properly informed on all aspects of the subject.
Then we have to face the possibility of judges having diminished mental capacities that impact their decisions.
Personally I think we need age restrictions on ALL positions that have power over any aspect of American politics and law.
I agree...for judges, people in Congress and the POTUS.
I think 70 is a good age to use, but could maybe go for 75.
I am less on board with the term limits mentioned above.
I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
The will of the people has been accepted for centuries
That is how we got Trump
Yes, it was authorized...I stand corrected.....But the USSC didn't even exist until an act of congress.Abolish it....It isn't even listed in the Constitution.....It is a creation of congress and can be done away with by them.
Are you ever not wrong?
Article III - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
View attachment 291405
The voters apply term limitsNo they don't, numskull. Those are terms, not term limits.They do have term limitsCongressmen should have term limits. I term for Senate and 3 terms for the House. There's no good reason to retain these criminals any longer than that.Do we need to create an amendment to force retirement for positions with lifetime appointments such as the supreme court?
This amendment would obviously take time to frame and pass so it would have no impact on Ginsburg so get that out of your head.
Other than using her as an example for her age and medical problems this topic is not directly about her.
There comes a point when missing oral arguments and other important duties required to serve as a justice becomes a problem. Many issues that come before the court deserve & maybe even demand the full attention of ALL of the justices. Votes should never come down to "going with the status quo" because you missed too much work to be properly informed on all aspects of the subject.
Then we have to face the possibility of judges having diminished mental capacities that impact their decisions.
Personally I think we need age restrictions on ALL positions that have power over any aspect of American politics and law.
I agree...for judges, people in Congress and the POTUS.
I think 70 is a good age to use, but could maybe go for 75.
I am less on board with the term limits mentioned above.
I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
2 years for a Congressman
6 years for Senators
Who are you trying to fool?
Same applies to TrumpHe uses Trump as an example. Asinine argument. EVERYONE had a say in Trumps victory/loss. Only a handful of morons voted in Mr Island Tips Over. We need protection from them. Term limits is the only viable answer. People like him and Maxine Waters should never be allowed to remain in DC this long.We got so many before Trump though. Ginsberg is a perfect example. An ACLU graduate who was disqualified just for that. She won't even leave with dignity. The Progs are forcing her to not retire. To bad she doesn't have the medical care of the regular people.Going before "the people" is not a good safety net. A perfect example is that idiot who thought an island could TIP OVER if over populated. That moron plays a role in forming the laws ALL OF US must follow and his constituents were clearly as dumb as him. All Americans need protection from idiots like him.I agree...for judges, people in Congress and the POTUS.
I think 70 is a good age to use, but could maybe go for 75.
I am less on board with the term limits mentioned above.
I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
The will of the people has been accepted for centuries
That is how we got Trump
Term limits apply to TrumpSame applies to TrumpHe uses Trump as an example. Asinine argument. EVERYONE had a say in Trumps victory/loss. Only a handful of morons voted in Mr Island Tips Over. We need protection from them. Term limits is the only viable answer. People like him and Maxine Waters should never be allowed to remain in DC this long.We got so many before Trump though. Ginsberg is a perfect example. An ACLU graduate who was disqualified just for that. She won't even leave with dignity. The Progs are forcing her to not retire. To bad she doesn't have the medical care of the regular people.Going before "the people" is not a good safety net. A perfect example is that idiot who thought an island could TIP OVER if over populated. That moron plays a role in forming the laws ALL OF US must follow and his constituents were clearly as dumb as him. All Americans need protection from idiots like him.I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
The will of the people has been accepted for centuries
That is how we got Trump
May not be suited for the job, but it is the will of the people
Let them bear the consequences
Abolish it....It isn't even listed in the Constitution.....It is a creation of congress and can be done away with by them.
Are you ever not wrong?
Article III - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
View attachment 291405
No they don't, dumb fuck. Term limits protect me from your Congressman, not from mine.The voters apply term limitsNo they don't, numskull. Those are terms, not term limits.They do have term limitsCongressmen should have term limits. I term for Senate and 3 terms for the House. There's no good reason to retain these criminals any longer than that.I agree...for judges, people in Congress and the POTUS.
I think 70 is a good age to use, but could maybe go for 75.
I am less on board with the term limits mentioned above.
I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
2 years for a Congressman
6 years for Senators
Who are you trying to fool?
They do it often
Trump has term limits, moron.Same applies to TrumpHe uses Trump as an example. Asinine argument. EVERYONE had a say in Trumps victory/loss. Only a handful of morons voted in Mr Island Tips Over. We need protection from them. Term limits is the only viable answer. People like him and Maxine Waters should never be allowed to remain in DC this long.We got so many before Trump though. Ginsberg is a perfect example. An ACLU graduate who was disqualified just for that. She won't even leave with dignity. The Progs are forcing her to not retire. To bad she doesn't have the medical care of the regular people.Going before "the people" is not a good safety net. A perfect example is that idiot who thought an island could TIP OVER if over populated. That moron plays a role in forming the laws ALL OF US must follow and his constituents were clearly as dumb as him. All Americans need protection from idiots like him.I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
The will of the people has been accepted for centuries
That is how we got Trump
May not be suited for the job, but it is the will of the people
Let them bear the consequences
I admitted my mistake....That's more than a shitheel like you would ever do.Abolish it....It isn't even listed in the Constitution.....It is a creation of congress and can be done away with by them.
Are you ever not wrong?
Article III - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
View attachment 291405
he’s not wrong this time. He’ll be wrong again soon enough
Fuck it...Abolish it all....Those asswipes have proven time and again that they will never ever stay in their box.Congressmen should have term limits. One term for Senate and 3 terms for the House. There's no good reason to retain these criminals any longer than that.
My bad.Oddball is right a hell of a lot more often than Golfing Gator. For one thing, he's actually a real libertarian.Abolish it....It isn't even listed in the Constitution.....It is a creation of congress and can be done away with by them.
Are you ever not wrong?
Article III - U.S. Constitution - FindLaw
View attachment 291405
he’s not wrong this time. He’ll be wrong again soon enough
I could see creating a requirement to re-confirm every Justice every 10 years.
Other than using her as an example for her age and medical problems this topic is not directly about her.
There comes a point when missing oral arguments and other important duties required to serve as a justice becomes a problem. Many issues that come before the court deserve & maybe even demand the full attention of ALL of the justices. Votes should never come down to "going with the status quo" because you missed too much work to be properly informed on all aspects of the subject.
Then we have to face the possibility of judges having diminished mental capacities that impact their decisions.
Personally I think we need age restrictions on ALL positions that have power over any aspect of American politics and law.
So you wish to restrict how others are allowed to voteNo they don't, dumb fuck. Term limits protect me from your Congressman, not from mine.The voters apply term limitsNo they don't, numskull. Those are terms, not term limits.They do have term limitsCongressmen should have term limits. I term for Senate and 3 terms for the House. There's no good reason to retain these criminals any longer than that.I disagree with Congress and POTUS having age limits
They have to go before the voters to take office. If voters want to select someone who is in their 80s, it is the will of the people
2 years for a Congressman
6 years for Senators
Who are you trying to fool?
They do it often
It never used to be necessary. A Presidents selection of a Supreme Court Justice used to be almost unanimous unless there were specific concernsOther than using her as an example for her age and medical problems this topic is not directly about her.
There comes a point when missing oral arguments and other important duties required to serve as a justice becomes a problem. Many issues that come before the court deserve & maybe even demand the full attention of ALL of the justices. Votes should never come down to "going with the status quo" because you missed too much work to be properly informed on all aspects of the subject.
Then we have to face the possibility of judges having diminished mental capacities that impact their decisions.
Personally I think we need age restrictions on ALL positions that have power over any aspect of American politics and law.
I think that we need to do physicals on office holders to see if they are still fit to hold office.
This should be a regular thing.
I would also make the term of a SCOTUS Justice only 10 years. That would eliminate everyone currently on the court except the last four.
We should also require a 2/3 majority in the Senate to approve appointments to SCOTUS. That would eliminate this shit of putting ideologues on the bench.
You are at odds with the vast majority of libertarians once again.Do we need to create an amendment to force retirement for positions with lifetime appointments such as the supreme court?
This amendment would obviously take time to frame and pass so it would have no impact on Ginsburg so get that out of your head.
Other than using her as an example for her age and medical problems this topic is not directly about her.
There comes a point when missing oral arguments and other important duties required to serve as a justice becomes a problem. Many issues that come before the court deserve & maybe even demand the full attention of ALL of the justices. Votes should never come down to "going with the status quo" because you missed too much work to be properly informed on all aspects of the subject.
Then we have to face the possibility of judges having diminished mental capacities that impact their decisions.
Personally I think we need age restrictions on ALL positions that have power over any aspect of American politics and law.
I agree...for judges, people in Congress and the POTUS.
I think 70 is a good age to use, but could maybe go for 75.
I am less on board with the term limits mentioned above.
