Do you believe Cohen or Trump?

[bripat9643]

 

[candycorn]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano has turned into a Trump-hating douchebag. He's opinion isn't worth the bandwidth used to broadcast it.

Oh…that is why he is on Fox.

So the Republican Mueller has turned
The Republican Napolitao has turned
Cohen has turned
Manafort has turned
Flynn has turned
Papadopolous has turned
The douche who ran the Enquirer has turned

How long until you turn? Or will you “take a bullet” for Trump?

 

[bripat9643]

 

[candycorn]

Collusion is meaningless.

The conspiracy of the Trump campaign with Russia to influence our election is very real.

Again, the AG is republican, the D-AG is a republican, and Mueller is a Republican. Blaming the democrats is, well, stupid and dishonest.

 

[beagle9]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano ???? ROTFLMBO. Good grief.. Next !

 

[bripat9643]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano has turned into a Trump-hating douchebag. He's opinion isn't worth the bandwidth used to broadcast it.

Oh…that is why he is on Fox.

So the Republican Mueller has turned
The Republican Napolitao has turned
Cohen has turned
Manafort has turned
Flynn has turned
Papadopolous has turned
The douche who ran the Enquirer has turned

How long until you turn? Or will you “take a bullet” for Trump?

You're comparing things that don't compare. There has always been a never Trump faction at FOX news. Dana Perino is a classic example. She used to work for the Bush administration. She is barely able to disguise her hatred for Trump. Aside from Mueller, Cohen is the only one on your chart that is actively attacking Trump. Mueller has always been a deep state establishment RINO. A lot of Republicans didn't know that about him, but his past has come to light.

 

[bripat9643]

Collusion is meaningless.

The conspiracy of the Trump campaign with Russia to influence our election is very real.

Again, the AG is republican, the D-AG is a republican, and Mueller is a Republican. Blaming the democrats is, well, stupid and dishonest.

It's purely in your imagination. If you have evidence of this "conspiracy," then produce it.

 

[edward37]

Trump’s white house….

View attachment 235080

Yep, and why is that ?? Why does the left fear a Donald Trump like they do ?? Was it because up until Trump, the left with all their bullcrap had convinced the nation that they were the only real leadership to ever grace us with their treachery and tyranny without us even realizing it ???? Did Trump spoil their party in which they were having with our government system's be it local and federal, our public school's, college's, judge's, and/or anything else they chose to bully their way around in, and abuse us with ?????? Trump the party pooper should be their cry now, because he sure came to town doing just that.

Mueller has been so secret as a strategy in order to keep this bullcrap going until it satisfies the leftist machine somehow.

Is Mueller vulnerable to the leftist power base for some reason ??? What's in it for Mueller to wreck this nation over this bullcrap for years to come ??

Treachery ??? You MF ers started a bs war and you call us treacherous?? How many dead are you responsible for ?? How tf do you sleep at night?

 

[Lesh]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Sorry...but there is evidence and testimony that shows the funds were
A. Not paid by Trump, so were way over the limit
B. Not reported (and in fact intentionally hidden)
C. Made for the purpose of furthering the election chances of one Donald J Trump (also known as the Orange Blotus)

 

[candycorn]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano ???? ROTFLMBO. Good grief.. Next !

What did he say that you think is laugh inducing? Oh yeah…you didn’t watch the video. Classic.

 

[rightwinger]

Both are liars...who do you believe?

If Cohen has tapes or documentation to support his claim, then I will tend to believe his version

National Enquirer owner admits to 'catch and kill' payment to ex-Playmate
AMI told prosecutors it worked with Trump’s campaign to pay for and suppress story of a sexual affair to ‘prevent it from influencing’ US election

American Media Inc (AMI) told prosecutors it worked “in concert” with Trump’s campaign when it bought Karen McDougal’s story of a sexual affair with Trump, which it suppressed “to prevent it from influencing the election”.

The publisher revealed details of the so-called “catch and kill” deal for McDougal’s story in an agreement with federal authorities that means the company will not face charges, prosecutors in Manhattan announced on Wednesday.

Illegal campaign contribution

 

[candycorn]

You're comparing things that don't compare. There has always been a never Trump faction at FOX news.

I had to update my signature line with that one. WOW.

 

[candycorn]

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano has turned into a Trump-hating douchebag. He's opinion isn't worth the bandwidth used to broadcast it.

Oh…that is why he is on Fox.

So the Republican Mueller has turned
The Republican Napolitao has turned
Cohen has turned
Manafort has turned
Flynn has turned
Papadopolous has turned
The douche who ran the Enquirer has turned

How long until you turn? Or will you “take a bullet” for Trump?

You're comparing things that don't compare. There has always been a never Trump faction at FOX news. Dana Perino is a classic example. She used to work for the Bush administration. She is barely able to disguise her hatred for Trump. Aside from Mueller, Cohen is the only one on your chart that is actively attacking Trump. Mueller has always been a deep state establishment RINO. A lot of Republicans didn't know that about him, but his past has come to light.

Ahh…Deep State? When are you going to stop the Deep State bullshit?

 

[candycorn]

Collusion is meaningless.

The conspiracy of the Trump campaign with Russia to influence our election is very real.

Again, the AG is republican, the D-AG is a republican, and Mueller is a Republican. Blaming the democrats is, well, stupid and dishonest.

It's purely in your imagination. If you have evidence of this "conspiracy," then produce it.

The investigation continues.
The noose is tightening.



Good.

 

[rightwinger]

Both have told different stories to different people. Neither are trustworthy imo.
Cohen imo is not a credible witness.

Agreed- both Cohen and Trump are documented liars- Trump clearly is not a credible witness to anything.

But you don't have to believe just one or the other- remember the National Enquirer's parent company has also admitted that the payments were for poltiical purposes.

And given the timing of the payments- just before the election- and that Trump didn't engineer payments years earlier when the stories first came out- it is pretty clear that the payments were very specifically to keep these stories out of the news to help Trump get elected.

And that's illegal how ??? As long as campaign funds weren't used to deal with clearing up lose ends in order to stop anyone from thinking that they can extort or blackmail the President of the United States while in office, then how is that illegal ?? If anything it's being responsible in protecting the office about to be occupied for the next 4 to 8 years by a person who will aquire that office through the voters wishes for him to do so.

Fox analyst Napolitano explains it very well.

Judge Napolitano Disproves Fox & Friends' Pro-Trump Talking Points Live On Air

Your specific question about “what crime” starts at 1:20.

Enjoy!

Napolitano has turned into a Trump-hating douchebag. He's opinion isn't worth the bandwidth used to broadcast it.

Oh…that is why he is on Fox.

So the Republican Mueller has turned
The Republican Napolitao has turned
Cohen has turned
Manafort has turned
Flynn has turned
Papadopolous has turned
The douche who ran the Enquirer has turned

How long until you turn? Or will you “take a bullet” for Trump?

They are all liars

Trump is the only one who tells us the truth

 

[nat4900]

They aren't presidents then, are they, shit for brains?

But THAT is why Trump wants morons like you to vote him back in in 2020.....He's scared shit-less of being out of office with all this pending legal problems......

If he loses, Trump may quickly move to either Siberia or Riyadh........LOL

 

[nat4900]

There is no "main crook," shit for brains.

Oh, DiaperBaby.......there is and he's vivid ORANGE....lol

 

[nat4900]

More horseshit from the puppet with Mueller's hand up his ass. If Mueller had anything, they wouldn't be sentencing Cohen because after they do they lose all leverage over him.

Don't be an eternal moron, DiaperBaby........Mueller and SDNY no longer need Cohen to sing his arias........The fucking documents, tapes, emails, etc. are ALL there to cook Trump's orange ass...............FACE REALITY.........lol

 

[theliq]

Its actually a moot point since there really wasn't any crime committed regarding the hush money payments to the bimbos.

TRUMP IS A SLUT,NO TWO WAYS ABOUT IT

 

[theliq]

The minute Cohen said he wanted to bring this country together, I knew he was full of shit.

STOP DEFENDING THAT SLUT TRUMP,PLEEEEEESE