Do you believe that we are now or will soon be overpopulated?

[boedicca]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

 

[sealybobo]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

Who cares what nationality Americans will be in 200 years? One time Greeks and Italians were blonde hair and blue eyed. Are Greeks and Italians today not proud of who they are?

I see your ancestors worrying about the white race. Let it go. Assimilate. We tell the blacks and foreigners and even the native Americans to assimilate well we have to realize our white kids are in a melting pot.

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind. Well why did you bring them here? But don’t get mad when you see foreigners sticking together because you do the same thing. You want your daughters to marry aryans

 

[Unkotare]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

 

[Rigby5]

Since the industrial revolution, we have depended entirely on fossil fuels.
That is not just for transportation, manufacturing, heating, and cooling, but also for the creation of fertilizers and almost all farm production.
If and when fossil fuels run out, humans will be starving until the population significantly decreases.
That is unless we somehow discover some miracle energy source like fusion.
But that is very unlikely, and things like wind, solar, and geothermal are way too tiny in comparison.

I don't believe it's unlikely that we'll develop fusion. Progress has been getting more rapid every year.

I am very, very skeptical.
They have been claiming big breakthroughs and right around the corner for over 50 years now with fusion.
I think the reason it will never happen is that if fusion ever because easy, like the "Mr. Fusion" added to the DeLorean on the one of the "Back to the Future" movies, then everyone would have a potential city destroying weapon.

Anyway, the point is we are relying totally on fossil fuels that concentrate millions of years of sunlight energy in very small space, and is rapidly running out.

Fusion cannot be made into a bomb. You obviously understand nothing about the process.

Fusion can ALWAYS be made into a bomb!
What you forget is that the size of current fusion reactors is so that they can withstand continual operation, and produce significant continual results. The reality is that once the process is ever perfected, micro miniaturization for a weapon, would be trivial.
Just because it is easy to shut down fusion experiments by cutting off the deuterium and tritium fuel, that does not mean it is not just as easy to let it race. Unlike fission, there no critical mass required. If it is self sustaining, all you need is the tiniest start and enough deuterium and tritium. Magnetic containment is just to allow it to continue while fuel starved. Without fuel starvation, you don't need magnetic containment. So much excess heat would be generated so quickly that it does not need to be or even could be contained.

For example, what if they discovered a way of initiating fusion with just a couple of lasers? The technology could be so cheap and easy, Uganda even could become a thermonuclear power over night. Not a good idea.

You only proved that you don't know jack shit about fusion. Just about everything you posted is wrong. The size of the reactors is not so they can withstand continual operation. None of the experimental reactors have ever sustained a fusion reaction for more than a few seconds. "Let it race" means nothing in the case of fusion. As I previously noted, they can't get the reaction to sustain for more than a few seconds. Fusion is not self sustaining. It takes massive amounts of electricity to make it happen.

I could go on and on, but everyone reading this will know that you are an ignoramus.

You need to study some physics, and listen when someone with a physics degree tries to explain it to you.
If what you claimed was true, that fusion can not get into a race chain reaction, then a hydrogen bomb would not be possible.
But it clearly is.
Fusion will initiate a chain reaction that accelerates until fuel runs out.
It is not at all difficult to start a thermonuclear chain reaction.
Fusion clearly IS self sustaining.

What you are getting confused by is that fusion normally wants to accelerate.
What makes fusion reactors fail and shut down, is that we don't want to let them accelerate, because that would destroy the facility.
So they try to limit the fuel supply to the very minimal.
And that does not work.
The reaction gets poisoned by mechanisms unknown.

If you want a different perspective to help clear out some of your obvious misconceptions, look up Philo T. Farnsworth, and his early fusion device, the Farnsworth Fusor.

Fusor - Wikipedia

The Fusor works, and does implement fusion. But it constantly shuts down due to unknown mechanisms. So all they can use it for is sterilization of MREs and other perishable food storage.
But imagine if someone ever figured out why it shuts down, and eliminates that?
There is nothing more terrifying than that prospect.

 

[Rigby5]

Is that why you, a union public school teacher is a Republican? They've convinced you that Democrats are communists? Boy are you fucking stupid.

Have you started a thread on this subject? I'd love for you to explain how my "masters" are communists.

I thought Democrats were in bed with the rich? I thought it was them who widened the gap between the rich and poor. THat's at least the stupid claim Republicans make. Now you are suggesting that we want to take the rich people's money and spread it around so that a doctor makes as much as a lowly public school teacher?

Who is saying that? No one. Maybe you need to re educate yourself. Maybe as a wrestler you were dropped on your head too many times.

The leaders of any supposed communist nation are all the rich.

Well trying to shrink the income inequality in this country or trying to shrink the gap between rich and poor isn't communism but that's what rich Republicans will tell you.

Gap between rich and poor continues to widen, latest Fed data show

What are Republicans doing about it? In 2016 they blamed Obama for it but now what are they doing to fix this problem? Or, now that Republicans are in charge, like the debt, this is no longer a problem. It was only a problem when Democrats were in charge. Blame Obama. But then don't give him credit for anything. Just blame.

The Democrats blame Republicans and the Republicans blame the Democrats and spending and deficits only matter to the party not in charge. I see no difference in the two parties.

Yes, both parties actually have nearly identical policies when it comes to important things like war, over spending, lying, the war on drugs, overly expensive health care, high tuition, lack of affordable housing, etc.

No, we didn't invade Iraq the Republicans did. They tried to get us to but we wouldn't bite. And Trump will drop a bomb on a country if it bombs it's citizens with chemical weapons. Boy if that wasn't a fake ass made up story designed to make Trump look better I don't know what is.

Overspending? What do Democrats overspend on? Infrastructure, social security, schools so that you can afford to go to them?

Obama and Hillary lied 1/10th the amount Trump has yet you guys think this is apples to apples.

War on drugs?
How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs
Obama’s drug war legacy is underappreciated. But it now hangs in the balance — thanks to Trump.

How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs

We want single payer. If you could have gotten 5 Republicans to go along we'd have it.

We are the party that wants to lower college tuition. Are you kidding with this one???

Lack of affordable housing? I didn't know this was even a problem other than for poor people. Are you poor? Then you certainly shouldn't be voting Republican.

If you don't see the difference that's probably why they will never solve these problems. Why should they when they can just keep you in a constant state of confusion?

You will find that it was Hillary and Kerry that caused the Republicans to get the votes needed to invade Iraq.
The dems were just as bad on that.

With the war on drugs, whether Obama did better or not, it was the Clintons who put the minor drug offenders in federal prisons with the 1994 Federal Crime Bill.

Don't know about single payer, except that it was in there originally, and no one seemed to fight for it.

We have the lowest level of owner occupied housing in history, and in the civilized world.
Slightly under 50%. Most counties have more like 90% owner occupied.
It is mostly unfair tax laws that favor landlords, that make housing unaffordable.

I am not confused at all.
The dems no longer support working class, unions, jobs, housing, food, medical care, etc.
Instead they support war overseas like in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syrian, Iran, etc., and war at home with gun confiscation.

 

[sealybobo]

The leaders of any supposed communist nation are all the rich.

Well trying to shrink the income inequality in this country or trying to shrink the gap between rich and poor isn't communism but that's what rich Republicans will tell you.

Gap between rich and poor continues to widen, latest Fed data show

What are Republicans doing about it? In 2016 they blamed Obama for it but now what are they doing to fix this problem? Or, now that Republicans are in charge, like the debt, this is no longer a problem. It was only a problem when Democrats were in charge. Blame Obama. But then don't give him credit for anything. Just blame.

The Democrats blame Republicans and the Republicans blame the Democrats and spending and deficits only matter to the party not in charge. I see no difference in the two parties.

Yes, both parties actually have nearly identical policies when it comes to important things like war, over spending, lying, the war on drugs, overly expensive health care, high tuition, lack of affordable housing, etc.

No, we didn't invade Iraq the Republicans did. They tried to get us to but we wouldn't bite. And Trump will drop a bomb on a country if it bombs it's citizens with chemical weapons. Boy if that wasn't a fake ass made up story designed to make Trump look better I don't know what is.

Overspending? What do Democrats overspend on? Infrastructure, social security, schools so that you can afford to go to them?

Obama and Hillary lied 1/10th the amount Trump has yet you guys think this is apples to apples.

War on drugs?
How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs
Obama’s drug war legacy is underappreciated. But it now hangs in the balance — thanks to Trump.

How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs

We want single payer. If you could have gotten 5 Republicans to go along we'd have it.

We are the party that wants to lower college tuition. Are you kidding with this one???

Lack of affordable housing? I didn't know this was even a problem other than for poor people. Are you poor? Then you certainly shouldn't be voting Republican.

If you don't see the difference that's probably why they will never solve these problems. Why should they when they can just keep you in a constant state of confusion?

You will find that it was Hillary and Kerry that caused the Republicans to get the votes needed to invade Iraq.
The dems were just as bad on that.

With the war on drugs, whether Obama did better or not, it was the Clintons who put the minor drug offenders in federal prisons with the 1994 Federal Crime Bill.

Don't know about single payer, except that it was in there originally, and no one seemed to fight for it.

We have the lowest level of owner occupied housing in history, and in the civilized world.
Slightly under 50%. Most counties have more like 90% owner occupied.
It is mostly unfair tax laws that favor landlords, that make housing unaffordable.

I am not confused at all.
The dems no longer support working class, unions, jobs, housing, food, medical care, etc.
Instead they support war overseas like in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syrian, Iran, etc., and war at home with gun confiscation.

You fail to acknowledge they were lied to too

 

[sealybobo]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

I had a date last night and we’re going boating Sunday loser no one really loves. You’re a paycheck.

 

[Papageorgio]

See here's another person saying that we aren't overpopulated, we just haven't engineered a solution to the fact that we are overpopulated.


If we had 1 million people on this planet we wouldn't need to worry about man's ability or inability to manage resources.

Sure we could go to 100% renewable energy and make room for another 100 million people. But then eventually we will run out of things like water and sand. Ok so then you will learn to turn salt water into drinking water and then we can pack on another 100 million pounds worth of people.

Or we could stop having so many kids and this planet can stay beautiful longer.

Here is a another person claiming I said something I didn’t. I didn’t say we were or weren’t over populated, I criticized man’s greed of not managing resources. And if you had only a million people you would still worry about resources and mismanagement. If all that are complaining about over population committed suicide, we wouldn’t have this problem. Maybe you need to reconsider gun control, the more violence the less population.

Yea but I don't want innocent people who are already living hurt. I just want all the poor people who can't afford to have kids without foodstamps or welfare to stop having kids. That's it. Is that wrong? We all want that don't we? I don't know why I'm the bad guy for saying we should have 13.2 million less people running around America right now.

There were 13,253,000 children living in poverty in 2016

I never said you are a bad guy. Just get sterlized.

No need. His personality and proclivities achieve the same results.

I’m helping the planet and Mother Nature. We have too many humans now just ask all the other animals who’ve gone extinct because of us.

Unkotare thinks every baby is so precious they are worth the bio diversity we once had??? I think also those extinct species were more precious

And what about the future? We should never run out of natural resources

If every human is ruining the earth as you claimed, then you aren’t helping, you are hurting the planet.

 

[Papageorgio]

Well trying to shrink the income inequality in this country or trying to shrink the gap between rich and poor isn't communism but that's what rich Republicans will tell you.

Gap between rich and poor continues to widen, latest Fed data show

What are Republicans doing about it? In 2016 they blamed Obama for it but now what are they doing to fix this problem? Or, now that Republicans are in charge, like the debt, this is no longer a problem. It was only a problem when Democrats were in charge. Blame Obama. But then don't give him credit for anything. Just blame.

The Democrats blame Republicans and the Republicans blame the Democrats and spending and deficits only matter to the party not in charge. I see no difference in the two parties.

Yes, both parties actually have nearly identical policies when it comes to important things like war, over spending, lying, the war on drugs, overly expensive health care, high tuition, lack of affordable housing, etc.

No, we didn't invade Iraq the Republicans did. They tried to get us to but we wouldn't bite. And Trump will drop a bomb on a country if it bombs it's citizens with chemical weapons. Boy if that wasn't a fake ass made up story designed to make Trump look better I don't know what is.

Overspending? What do Democrats overspend on? Infrastructure, social security, schools so that you can afford to go to them?

Obama and Hillary lied 1/10th the amount Trump has yet you guys think this is apples to apples.

War on drugs?
How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs
Obama’s drug war legacy is underappreciated. But it now hangs in the balance — thanks to Trump.

How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs

We want single payer. If you could have gotten 5 Republicans to go along we'd have it.

We are the party that wants to lower college tuition. Are you kidding with this one???

Lack of affordable housing? I didn't know this was even a problem other than for poor people. Are you poor? Then you certainly shouldn't be voting Republican.

If you don't see the difference that's probably why they will never solve these problems. Why should they when they can just keep you in a constant state of confusion?

You will find that it was Hillary and Kerry that caused the Republicans to get the votes needed to invade Iraq.
The dems were just as bad on that.

With the war on drugs, whether Obama did better or not, it was the Clintons who put the minor drug offenders in federal prisons with the 1994 Federal Crime Bill.

Don't know about single payer, except that it was in there originally, and no one seemed to fight for it.

We have the lowest level of owner occupied housing in history, and in the civilized world.
Slightly under 50%. Most counties have more like 90% owner occupied.
It is mostly unfair tax laws that favor landlords, that make housing unaffordable.

I am not confused at all.
The dems no longer support working class, unions, jobs, housing, food, medical care, etc.
Instead they support war overseas like in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syrian, Iran, etc., and war at home with gun confiscation.

You fail to acknowledge they were lied to too

Kerry, Bill and Hillary Clinton and Gore had first hand knowledge, so no they weren’t lied to, you are the one lying.

 

[bripat9643]

I don't believe it's unlikely that we'll develop fusion. Progress has been getting more rapid every year.

I am very, very skeptical.
They have been claiming big breakthroughs and right around the corner for over 50 years now with fusion.
I think the reason it will never happen is that if fusion ever because easy, like the "Mr. Fusion" added to the DeLorean on the one of the "Back to the Future" movies, then everyone would have a potential city destroying weapon.

Anyway, the point is we are relying totally on fossil fuels that concentrate millions of years of sunlight energy in very small space, and is rapidly running out.

Fusion cannot be made into a bomb. You obviously understand nothing about the process.

Fusion can ALWAYS be made into a bomb!
What you forget is that the size of current fusion reactors is so that they can withstand continual operation, and produce significant continual results. The reality is that once the process is ever perfected, micro miniaturization for a weapon, would be trivial.
Just because it is easy to shut down fusion experiments by cutting off the deuterium and tritium fuel, that does not mean it is not just as easy to let it race. Unlike fission, there no critical mass required. If it is self sustaining, all you need is the tiniest start and enough deuterium and tritium. Magnetic containment is just to allow it to continue while fuel starved. Without fuel starvation, you don't need magnetic containment. So much excess heat would be generated so quickly that it does not need to be or even could be contained.

For example, what if they discovered a way of initiating fusion with just a couple of lasers? The technology could be so cheap and easy, Uganda even could become a thermonuclear power over night. Not a good idea.

You only proved that you don't know jack shit about fusion. Just about everything you posted is wrong. The size of the reactors is not so they can withstand continual operation. None of the experimental reactors have ever sustained a fusion reaction for more than a few seconds. "Let it race" means nothing in the case of fusion. As I previously noted, they can't get the reaction to sustain for more than a few seconds. Fusion is not self sustaining. It takes massive amounts of electricity to make it happen.

I could go on and on, but everyone reading this will know that you are an ignoramus.

You need to study some physics, and listen when someone with a physics degree tries to explain it to you.
If what you claimed was true, that fusion can not get into a race chain reaction, then a hydrogen bomb would not be possible.
But it clearly is.
Fusion will initiate a chain reaction that accelerates until fuel runs out.
It is not at all difficult to start a thermonuclear chain reaction.
Fusion clearly IS self sustaining.

Are you trying to tell me you have a degree in physics? Really?

Thermonuclear bombs work because of "nuclear" part, dumbass. You need a nuclear explosion to trigger the fusion reaction, and nothing short of that. There is also nothing called a "race chain reaction." There are chain reactions. That's it.

What you are getting confused by is that fusion normally wants to accelerate.
What makes fusion reactors fail and shut down, is that we don't want to let them accelerate, because that would destroy the facility.
So they try to limit the fuel supply to the very minimal.
And that does not work.
The reaction gets poisoned by mechanisms unknown.

If you want a different perspective to help clear out some of your obvious misconceptions, look up Philo T. Farnsworth, and his early fusion device, the Farnsworth Fusor.

Fusor - Wikipedia

The Fusor works, and does implement fusion. But it constantly shuts down due to unknown mechanisms. So all they can use it for is sterilization of MREs and other perishable food storage.
But imagine if someone ever figured out why it shuts down, and eliminates that?
There is nothing more terrifying than that prospect.

If the fusor can keep a fusion reaction going, then where's the evidence for this so-called "fusion chain reaction" you keep claiming exists?

 

[Unkotare]

Well trying to shrink the income inequality in this country or trying to shrink the gap between rich and poor isn't communism but that's what rich Republicans will tell you.

Gap between rich and poor continues to widen, latest Fed data show

What are Republicans doing about it? In 2016 they blamed Obama for it but now what are they doing to fix this problem? Or, now that Republicans are in charge, like the debt, this is no longer a problem. It was only a problem when Democrats were in charge. Blame Obama. But then don't give him credit for anything. Just blame.

The Democrats blame Republicans and the Republicans blame the Democrats and spending and deficits only matter to the party not in charge. I see no difference in the two parties.

Yes, both parties actually have nearly identical policies when it comes to important things like war, over spending, lying, the war on drugs, overly expensive health care, high tuition, lack of affordable housing, etc.

No, we didn't invade Iraq the Republicans did. They tried to get us to but we wouldn't bite. And Trump will drop a bomb on a country if it bombs it's citizens with chemical weapons. Boy if that wasn't a fake ass made up story designed to make Trump look better I don't know what is.

Overspending? What do Democrats overspend on? Infrastructure, social security, schools so that you can afford to go to them?

Obama and Hillary lied 1/10th the amount Trump has yet you guys think this is apples to apples.

War on drugs?
How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs
Obama’s drug war legacy is underappreciated. But it now hangs in the balance — thanks to Trump.

How Obama quietly reshaped America’s war on drugs

We want single payer. If you could have gotten 5 Republicans to go along we'd have it.

We are the party that wants to lower college tuition. Are you kidding with this one???

Lack of affordable housing? I didn't know this was even a problem other than for poor people. Are you poor? Then you certainly shouldn't be voting Republican.

If you don't see the difference that's probably why they will never solve these problems. Why should they when they can just keep you in a constant state of confusion?

You will find that it was Hillary and Kerry that caused the Republicans to get the votes needed to invade Iraq.
The dems were just as bad on that.

With the war on drugs, whether Obama did better or not, it was the Clintons who put the minor drug offenders in federal prisons with the 1994 Federal Crime Bill.

Don't know about single payer, except that it was in there originally, and no one seemed to fight for it.

We have the lowest level of owner occupied housing in history, and in the civilized world.
Slightly under 50%. Most counties have more like 90% owner occupied.
It is mostly unfair tax laws that favor landlords, that make housing unaffordable.

I am not confused at all.
The dems no longer support working class, unions, jobs, housing, food, medical care, etc.
Instead they support war overseas like in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, Syrian, Iran, etc., and war at home with gun confiscation.

You fail to acknowledge they were lied to too

democrats

 

[there4eyeM]

The two party dictatorship is no joke.

 

[boedicca]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

Who cares what nationality Americans will be in 200 years? One time Greeks and Italians were blonde hair and blue eyed. Are Greeks and Italians today not proud of who they are?

I see your ancestors worrying about the white race. Let it go. Assimilate. We tell the blacks and foreigners and even the native Americans to assimilate well we have to realize our white kids are in a melting pot.

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind. Well why did you bring them here? But don’t get mad when you see foreigners sticking together because you do the same thing. You want your daughters to marry aryans

Oh blah blah blah nonsense nonsense nonsense.

Here's a clue bub: culture matters. There is a fine line between immigration and invasion. When immigrants do not learn the language and do not accept the basic values of our culture, what makes the U.S. the most successful country in modern history will be destroyed. This is not a race issue; it is one of preserving our culture.

And you know nothing about my ancestors, so frell off.

 

[boedicca]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

I had a date last night and we’re going boating Sunday loser no one really loves. You’re a paycheck.

Nobody wants your date except losers, bub - but she will be quite useful as a floatation device if your boat capsizes.

 

[sealybobo]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

Who cares what nationality Americans will be in 200 years? One time Greeks and Italians were blonde hair and blue eyed. Are Greeks and Italians today not proud of who they are?

I see your ancestors worrying about the white race. Let it go. Assimilate. We tell the blacks and foreigners and even the native Americans to assimilate well we have to realize our white kids are in a melting pot.

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind. Well why did you bring them here? But don’t get mad when you see foreigners sticking together because you do the same thing. You want your daughters to marry aryans

Oh blah blah blah nonsense nonsense nonsense.

Here's a clue bub: culture matters. There is a fine line between immigration and invasion. When immigrants do not learn the language and do not accept the basic values of our culture, what makes the U.S. the most successful country in modern history will be destroyed. This is not a race issue; it is one of preserving our culture.

And you know nothing about my ancestors, so frell off.

Nonsense. The parents, maybe even the kids will hold on to the culture but the grandkids will be 100% Americans no matter how they look.

 

[sealybobo]

The two party dictatorship is no joke.

The 3 party systems even worse

 

[sealybobo]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

I had a date last night and we’re going boating Sunday loser no one really loves. You’re a paycheck.

Nobody wants your date except losers, bub - but she will be quite useful as a floatation device if your boat capsizes.

View attachment 207363

I wish I could post pics. Her body is a 8 and her face a 7. Me being 47 to me she’s a 9 body and 8 face. She’s still perfect. No age flaws yet. I remember when I first met her. I would have never dreamed that hot young girl would blow and fuck me. No way.

 

[Unkotare]

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

I had a date last night and we’re going boating Sunday loser no one really loves. You’re a paycheck.

Nobody wants your date except losers, bub - but she will be quite useful as a floatation device if your boat capsizes.

View attachment 207363

I wish I could post pics. Her body is a 8 and her face a 7. Me being 47 to me she’s a 9 body and 8 face. She’s still perfect. No age flaws yet. I remember when I first met her. I would have never dreamed that hot young girl would blow and fuck me. No way.

Comments like this are how we know for sure you are either a 13-year-old virgin or a sad old closeted queen.

 

[bripat9643]

Simple question before I head out to work. Do you believe in overpopulation, do you think it's a current problem or a very near future one, and what label would you use to identify yourself overall?

No. Developed nations are more at risk of declining native born populations as the birth rate is below the replacement rate.

Who cares what nationality Americans will be in 200 years? One time Greeks and Italians were blonde hair and blue eyed. Are Greeks and Italians today not proud of who they are?

I see your ancestors worrying about the white race. Let it go. Assimilate. We tell the blacks and foreigners and even the native Americans to assimilate well we have to realize our white kids are in a melting pot.

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind. Well why did you bring them here? But don’t get mad when you see foreigners sticking together because you do the same thing. You want your daughters to marry aryans

Oh blah blah blah nonsense nonsense nonsense.

Here's a clue bub: culture matters. There is a fine line between immigration and invasion. When immigrants do not learn the language and do not accept the basic values of our culture, what makes the U.S. the most successful country in modern history will be destroyed. This is not a race issue; it is one of preserving our culture.

And you know nothing about my ancestors, so frell off.

Nonsense. The parents, maybe even the kids will hold on to the culture but the grandkids will be 100% Americans no matter how they look.

Not if the live in a neighborhood where all the signs are in Spanish, the schools teach in Spanish and everyone speaks Spanish.

 

[sealybobo]

...

I get mad at foreigners who come here and want their kids to only date their kind...

You get mad because no one will date you.

I had a date last night and we’re going boating Sunday loser no one really loves. You’re a paycheck.

Nobody wants your date except losers, bub - but she will be quite useful as a floatation device if your boat capsizes.

View attachment 207363

I wish I could post pics. Her body is a 8 and her face a 7. Me being 47 to me she’s a 9 body and 8 face. She’s still perfect. No age flaws yet. I remember when I first met her. I would have never dreamed that hot young girl would blow and fuck me. No way.

Comments like this are how we know for sure you are either a 13-year-old virgin or a sad old closeted queen.

Just being honest. I’ve never told a lie. Wait. That’s a lie