ReinyDays
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2019
- 14,632
- 6,998
You just said it was. A woman's role can only be measured in response to men and vise versa. No part decides its own role only relative to itself. That is like leaving it up to the motor cam to be SQUARE, just because the cam prefers four sides to being round, makes no sense.
I disagree entirely ... in science, we try not to measure things against each other ... rather, we measure against a defined standard ... and here I'm using reproduction as our metric ... which is better equipped to raise children in our society? ... I say women, each child starts out inside her ...
No, we are right back to one company having forty CEOs again. Can't work that way. If every part in an engine gets to decide its own role for itself independent of all other considerations, all you'd end up with is a non-functioning pile of junk, exactly what the Left have given us as a society with all of their prog philosophies.
Traditionally ... the woman is compelled to stay at home and raise children ... even I remember the girls were required to take Home Economics in high school, or not graduate ... progressives brought the allowance or women getting jobs and having careers ...
Would you take that away from women? ...
(You analogy fails, the traditional family only has two parents ... presumably with deep emotional attachments ... and that's a horrible business practice ... never ever dork your business partner) ...