Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
- Aug 15, 2017
- 46,062
- 29,789
If the Amendment stated:
"Daniel Palos, being a public danger to freedom due to his being a goose-stepping pinko commie ass hat who may try to start a communist revolution in America, thus he and his commie cohorts being shot down in the streets being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
It would still mean the federal government (and now the state/local gov. via 14th Amendment) shall not infringe on a person's right to keep and bear (carry) arms.
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)
"Daniel Palos, being a public danger to freedom due to his being a goose-stepping pinko commie ass hat who may try to start a communist revolution in America, thus he and his commie cohorts being shot down in the streets being necessary for the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."
It would still mean the federal government (and now the state/local gov. via 14th Amendment) shall not infringe on a person's right to keep and bear (carry) arms.
![dunno :dunno: :dunno:](/styles/smilies/dunno.gif)