Do you realize that Trump will be the ONLY world leader who denies Climate Change?

Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.
Do you realize you have us confused with people who give a shit?
 
[


YOU think Global Warming is a scam. I don't. Trump is and has always been about the bottom line. Always.

I was an Environmental Engineer for 30 years and taught a few college level course in retirement. I was involved in the first implementation of the CAA, CWA, RCRA, SDWA, NPDES and others. I have probably cleaned up more pollution in one month of my career than you and a thousand environmental wackos will see in your lifetimes. I am not an expert on climate change but I am well read and I do have the technical background to know a scam when I see one.

There is absolutely no proof that man is significantly changing the climate. Man is polluting the environment but that is different than changing the climate. Most environmental wackos don't even know the difference.

We all are are about the bottom line in one way another. It would be the epitome of hypocrisy to suggest that you are not.

I am glad that Trump is about improving the economy. That Crooked Hillary bitch would have been a disaster with her agenda to pay back the contributors to her money laundering foundation.

Sorry, I mean no disrespect, but I'm going to believe the 99.9% of scientists who say that climate change is real before I believe you.

Cleaning up a bunch of pollution does not give you any additional credibility on this matter.


Those scientists are all world wide university scientist's, funded by government grants. Go against what they are looking for and you don't get the money next year.
The real scientists funded by private funding says there is not enough data yet to make a certain conclusion.
What about the scientists that work in industry? Are they part of the "government plot"?

Tell me son......
Who funds the "scientists"?
Depends on where they work. Someone must like their work, or they wouldn't get paid.
 
Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

I find it hilarious that only folks such as yourself see this as an important issue. The rest of us don't. I'll be so glad when Trump pulls us out of that farcical Paris agreement.
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points from Shell Oil.

Ah, do you hate that oil companies make billions in profits? I mean lets get down to the real reason you people push this global warming crap, your hatred of corporations, in particular energy corporations oil, gas, coal.
 
I'm a member on an inventors forum as well, and someone jokingly came up with an idea in a dream that I thought would be pretty cool. It would be a solar powered Zeppelin with some kind of suction and filtration system in it so that it could be drone piloted around like a Roomba in the sky over cities with bad smog problems and clean the air. If someone can come up with the plans do this, I bet China would pay some big bucks!
 
Why are "Conservatives" so skeptical about science? Is it because their information comes from energy producers who are driven by profit and stock prices rather than reducing greenhouse gases? Is it because they "Conservatives" have no love for our one and only planet? Is it because money is a greater motivator than the health of our one and only planet? Is it because they actually believe that mankind cannot screw up the environment?

The skepticism and disdain for science is baffling to those of us who paid attention in school.
Omg...maybe you didn't pay as much attention in school as you think.
But, then again, depends what you were taught.

Global warming is a theory supported by subjective data,
to sell the theory to others in order to advance an agenda.

Greehouse gases are real but the scapegoat, by subjective science.

Do you not know, everything is dependant upon everything else.
One disruption, to one ecosystem, over time,
will cause a disruption in all the rest, and continue from there.

The majority of greenhouse gases occur naturally.
And the reason greenhouse gases have increased,
is because of the loss of what naturally absorbed these gases.

We have disrupted the balance of nature, plain & simple.
It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out!
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points for Shell Oil.

Do you realize that all of the big oil companies are doing research for cheaper long term energy?
But not a damn thing on reducing greenhouse gases.

Then what was all of those government regulations for them to all get filters put in?
Our Electric and Coal energy plants are operating at 86% or more pure in all of our plants.
All cars have filters that have reduced them.
Without China, India,or the middle east doing something about it there is nothing more that we do that will stop them.
Obama's idea of lead by example hasn't done diddly squat.
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points for Shell Oil.

Do you realize that all of the big oil companies are doing research for cheaper long term energy?
But not a damn thing on reducing greenhouse gases.

Then what was all of those government regulations for them to all get filters put in?
Our Electric and Coal energy plants are operating at 86% or more pure in all of our plants.
All cars have filters that have reduced them.
Without China, India,or the middle east doing something about it there is nothing more that we do that will stop them.
Obama's idea of lead by example hasn't done diddly squat.
Next they'll be telling us not to shit or fart :hmpf:
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points for Shell Oil.

Do you realize that all of the big oil companies are doing research for cheaper long term energy?
But not a damn thing on reducing greenhouse gases.

Then what was all of those government regulations for them to all get filters put in?
Our Electric and Coal energy plants are operating at 86% or more pure in all of our plants.
All cars have filters that have reduced them.
Without China, India,or the middle east doing something about it there is nothing more that we do that will stop them.
Obama's idea of lead by example hasn't done diddly squat.

There are plenty of good reasons for us to reduce emissions, but at a reasonable pace that doesn't throw hard working middle class Americans under the bus. That's why Trump won this election, Obama, Hillary they have thrown the middle class under the bus countless times in favor of extreme left positions that sacrifice middle class jobs. Typical of liberals if its not their job being destroyed they don't really care.
 
Why are "Conservatives" so skeptical about science? Is it because their information comes from energy producers who are driven by profit and stock prices rather than reducing greenhouse gases? Is it because they "Conservatives" have no love for our one and only planet? Is it because money is a greater motivator than the health of our one and only planet? Is it because they actually believe that mankind cannot screw up the environment?

The skepticism and disdain for science is baffling to those of us who paid attention in school.
Omg...maybe you didn't pay as much attention in school as you think.
But, then again, depends what you were taught.

Global warming is a theory supported by subjective data,
to sell the theory to others in order to advance an agenda.

Greehouse gases are real but the scapegoat, by subjective science.

Do you not know, everything is dependant upon everything else.
One disruption, to one ecosystem, over time,
will cause a disruption in all the rest, and continue from there.

The majority of greenhouse gases occur naturally.
And the reason greenhouse gases have increased,
is because of the loss of what naturally absorbed these gases.

We have disrupted the balance of nature, plain & simple.
It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out!


Most of the largest part of that loss is the rain forest in the Amazon.
Sorry people but you are getting the wool pulled over your eyes from environmentalists who have used governments to push their agenda. They hate oil and coal.
Some of the more honest and real environmentalists are pushing to save our rainforests and plant more trees but they are mostly pushed out by the more hateful bullies.
The environmentalists pushing for more greenery are the correct ones we should all be behind.
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points for Shell Oil.

Do you realize that all of the big oil companies are doing research for cheaper long term energy?
But not a damn thing on reducing greenhouse gases.

Then what was all of those government regulations for them to all get filters put in?
Our Electric and Coal energy plants are operating at 86% or more pure in all of our plants.
All cars have filters that have reduced them.
Without China, India,or the middle east doing something about it there is nothing more that we do that will stop them.
Obama's idea of lead by example hasn't done diddly squat.
Next they'll be telling us not to shit or fart :hmpf:


They were all ready on board with that on cow farts so maybe so. :lmao:
These people are wacky.
 
Why are "Conservatives" so skeptical about science? Is it because their information comes from energy producers who are driven by profit and stock prices rather than reducing greenhouse gases? Is it because they "Conservatives" have no love for our one and only planet? Is it because money is a greater motivator than the health of our one and only planet? Is it because they actually believe that mankind cannot screw up the environment?

The skepticism and disdain for science is baffling to those of us who paid attention in school.
Omg...maybe you didn't pay as much attention in school as you think.
But, then again, depends what you were taught.

Global warming is a theory supported by subjective data,
to sell the theory to others in order to advance an agenda.

Greehouse gases are real but the scapegoat, by subjective science.

Do you not know, everything is dependant upon everything else.
One disruption, to one ecosystem, over time,
will cause a disruption in all the rest, and continue from there.

The majority of greenhouse gases occur naturally.
And the reason greenhouse gases have increased,
is because of the loss of what naturally absorbed these gases.

We have disrupted the balance of nature, plain & simple.
It shouldn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out!


Most of the largest part of that loss is the rain forest in the Amazon.
Sorry people but you are getting the wool pulled over your eyes from environmentalists who have used governments to push their agenda. They hate oil and coal.
Some of the more honest and real environmentalists are pushing to save our rainforests and plant more trees but they are mostly pushed out by the more hateful bullies.
The environmentalists pushing for more greenery are the correct ones we should all be behind.
Yep yep, tree huggers had it right!
The loss of trees and plant life
was devastating to the balance of every ecosystem!
 
Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.
We are so lucky to have a president who isn't as gullible and sleazy as other world leaders.
 
Record crops here in Idaho this year.
Lot's of ethanol so the leftist elitist can fly around the globe leaving their carbon footprint espousing the danger of fossil fuels.
 
Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.

It's actually not hilarious, it's terrifying.
It's hilarious that morons like you are so hysterical about it.
 
Even Putin believes in climate change.

Even North Korea signed the Paris accords.

Trump, the ONLY world leader who believes climate change is a hoax. And we know America has more science deniers than any other country when it comes to climate change.

I find that hilarious.
So these advocates that you worship, do they follow the same rules that they advocate you do?
 
Why are you all believing in univertisy research government funding?
Those labs are a joke.
That is peer reviewed science, not talking points for Shell Oil.

Do you realize that all of the big oil companies are doing research for cheaper long term energy?
But not a damn thing on reducing greenhouse gases.

Then what was all of those government regulations for them to all get filters put in?
Our Electric and Coal energy plants are operating at 86% or more pure in all of our plants.
All cars have filters that have reduced them.
Without China, India,or the middle east doing something about it there is nothing more that we do that will stop them.
Obama's idea of lead by example hasn't done diddly squat.

There are plenty of good reasons for us to reduce emissions, but at a reasonable pace that doesn't throw hard working middle class Americans under the bus. That's why Trump won this election, Obama, Hillary they have thrown the middle class under the bus countless times in favor of extreme left positions that sacrifice middle class jobs. Typical of liberals if its not their job being destroyed they don't really care.

There is no good reason for reducing CO2 emissions. It's not a pollutant. Plants need it to live. The increase in CO2 has helped increase the production of crop plants and been a boon to humanity.
 

Forum List

Back
Top