Do you remember when Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate?

Attorney General Merrick Garland is under scrutiny after a parents group revealed that his daughter is married to the co-founder of an education company funded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg that allegedly employs critical race theory in its work, according to a report.
 
View attachment 548558

It was not long ago that Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate for SCOTUS, just like they did Biden.

Hopefully, we are done with thinking any of these radical extremists are moderates.

F#ck'em all!!!!!!!
He is a moderate. However, he simply will not sit back and legally allow these extremist Tump cultists to act out. We all know what the tump ilk would do, yes? They are as Un-American as they can be. Fuck 'em all.
 
He is a moderate. However, he simply will not sit back and legally allow these extremist Tump cultists to act out. We all know what the tump ilk would do, yes? They are as Un-American as they can be. Fuck 'em all.
Well, there ya go...Wear that fascist arm band proudly
 
Not what is being proposed by Garland
Why don’t you read his memo?

DOJ is only going to assess to problem and recommend solutions.

But you just go ahead and keep claiming the FBI is taking over local School Board meetings. it impresses your fellow Conservatives

I have read his memo, and you are apparently incapable of understanding the english language.

I asked 'So any organization in the US that is receiving threats should be able to reach out to the DOJ and expect their intervention and help?'

Which you can't give a straight answer for... You either have to pretend like you don't understand the context of the question, or you actually don't understand it, either way is pathetic.
 
Disagreement with the DNC has now been criminalized by punks like yourself.
You've been fed right wing propaganda, like the other 5 threads or more started on this topic the past 24 hours.... And like a good minion, you've followed and posted what your favored propagandists told you to hate, told you to be angry about...:rolleyes:

Why are you guys so EASILY lead down this path of hatred and anger? Why oh why oh why???

No one is making protesting illegal, no one is going after protesters.

Garland s memorandum is about threats of violence, intimidation and harassment of school teachers, school staff, administrators, and school board members....which is against the law.

Haven't you seen all of the harassment videos on the news of Trumpers harassing and threatening teachers? Or does your right wing media propagandists keep that from you?
 
I have read his memo, and you are apparently incapable of understanding the english language.

I asked 'So any organization in the US that is receiving threats should be able to reach out to the DOJ and expect their intervention and help?'

Which you can't give a straight answer for... You either have to pretend like you don't understand the context of the question, or you actually don't understand it, either way is pathetic.

Why should nationwide organizations receiving threats NOT be able to reach out to DOJ?
 
Why should nationwide organizations receiving threats NOT be able to reach out to DOJ?

Because it's not covered under federal law, unless you're labeling them 'domestic terrorists'. Why is there a 'national school board assoc', is it a government entity, are all school boards required to be represented by it? Who are they speaking for exactly?
 
Because it's not covered under federal law, unless you're labeling them 'domestic terrorists'. Why is there a 'national school board assoc', is it a government entity, are all school boards required to be represented by it? Who are they speaking for exactly?
If it impacts multiple states it is covered

The FBI has ALWAYS been authorized to assist local police forces
 
No problems with Barr sending the fbi/ doj in to all states to help local authorities investigate the non existing voter fraud..... Breaking all Doj rules on not being involved in elections until AFTER certification by the States.

What Barr did, broke the Doj governing rules.

What Garland did,

did not break any DOJ governing rules.
 
Looks like something the FBI definitely needs to get involved in

Namely, what would cause irate conservatives around the country to storm school board meetings and threaten them about Critical Race Theory when none of them are proposing CRT on the curriculum?

We saw the same thing with irate conservatives storming meetings and demanding that Sharia Law not be imposed when nobody ever proposed Sharia Law

What would cause this?
A mass case of idiocy among Conservatives?
Some group Conspiring to push their buttons on a nonissue?
Some drug induced trance in Conservatives?
 
View attachment 548558

It was not long ago that Merrick Garland was presented as a moderate for SCOTUS, just like they did Biden.

Hopefully, we are done with thinking any of these radical extremists are moderates.

F#ck'em all!!!!!!!
Well, he was a "moderate" compared to some of the other choices that could have been made. But, it was rather obvious that he would slant the court to the left. The pick didn't really fool anyone. Going from Scalia to Garland was a far bigger leap than moderation. Gotta wonder though, if the country continues going downhill fast, Bryer may decide that he'd better retire before the winners are seated after the 2022 midterms. He may very well retire in June 2022.
 
Because it's not covered under federal law, unless you're labeling them 'domestic terrorists'. Why is there a 'national school board assoc', is it a government entity, are all school boards required to be represented by it? Who are they speaking for exactly?
If the FBI is involved, it is lawful for them to be involved. The FBI would prefer not to be involved
since they have plenty on their plate these days. Funny how you tumpeciles are "experts" on the laws, the Constitution and anything else about which you know very little.
 
If it impacts multiple states it is covered

The FBI has ALWAYS been authorized to assist local police forces

What is 'it'? Where is the evidence that the DOJ even has legal standing to do what they're doing?

I truly can't wait for the day that there is an R administration doing this very same thing, and you all come in here screaming about it, it will be highly amusing. The hypocrisy never ends.
 

Forum List

Back
Top