DriftingSand
Cast Iron Member
CaféAuLait;8914395 said:The ultimate Progressive is for abortion but opposed to fossil fuels. So in a perfect, Progressive world would it be reasonable to think that aborted fetuses would be used in place of fossil fuels for America's energy needs? Heck ... it might even become posh to have lampshades made of ...
Sickening thought, I know, but don't Libs reject the idea that unborn babies are really human? So am I really that far off base?
Um, I don't know about lampshades, but the UK are already using fetuses in their waste to energy" plant, heating the hospitals, while telling the parents of miscarried ( not intentionally aborted) babies they had cremated the remains. They did the same to intentionally aborted fetuses as well.
One of the countrys leading hospitals, Addenbrookes in Cambridge, incinerated 797 babies below 13 weeks gestation at their own waste to energy plant. The mothers were told the remains had been cremated.
Another waste to energy facility at Ipswich Hospital, operated by a private contractor, incinerated 1,101 foetal remains between 2011 and 2013.
They were brought in from another hospital before being burned, generating energy for the hospital site. Ipswich Hospital itself disposes of remains by cremation.
This practice is totally unacceptable, said Dr Poulter.
Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals - Telegraph
I wasn't aware of that. That's truly horrible. Harvesting their own young for consumption by the people. Next thing you know they'll be adding babies to their mineral supplements. There are probably some of those ghouls who would readily partake. If a person never believed in evil before they ought to now.