Does a criminal indictment of a former US President reek of a third world country?

Time has passed and the dig and pony show witch hunt has list almost all its steam
Kamala is the bright shiny object for the children right now
In reality, Trump still faces 2 criminal trials, with the third being ramped back up after Cannon is overturned.

In reality, the orange slob is running only to stay out of prison.

And that's good enough, for his adoring flock.
 
Oh, I see. Then surely you can explain that despite said video and filings, Trump was never charged of anything?
I cannot explain your bizarre lie that he was not charged with crimes.

Only an experienced psychologist could attempt to to explain your abnormal behavior.
 
I cannot explain your bizarre lie that he was not charged with crimes.

Only an experienced psychologist could attempt to to explain your abnormal behavior.
Charged has no meaning when it's politically motivated. None of the pretend charges will succeed, ever.

You're onboard with Trump incited an insurrection, where are these charges?
 
Charged has no meaning when it's politically motivated.
Actually, it does. The courts don't care about your whining or if a prosecutor ran for office on a platform of nailing a specific criminal. Sorry.

Grand juries operate on the evidence. Trial juries operate on the evidence. Judges operate on the evidence.

Got anything else?
 
Actually, it does. The courts don't care about your whining or if a prosecutor ran for office on a platform of nailing a specific criminal. Sorry.

Grand juries operate on the evidence. Trial juries operate on the evidence. Judges operate on the evidence.

Got anything else?

Sure do. What's the evidence, the charge, and what has Trump been found guilty of?

Besides your TDS I mean? Course the left are responsible for your condition, but let's pretend it's Trump's fault, cuz he lives in your head, rent free.
 
What's the evidence
I don't feed the sea lions, sorry.

I refer you to the very public indictments.

In an indictment -- since this is the first time you have heard of one or will have ever read one -- there is a long list called "statement of facts".

Reading them will give you a sense of the evidence they have, which will be introduced to prove true each statement of fact.

Then the facts together will be used to make their case.

Good luck. I'm rooting for you.
 
I don't feed the sea lions, sorry.

I refer you to the very public indictments.

In an indictment -- since this is the first time you have heard of one or will have ever read one -- there is a long list called "statement of facts".

Reading them will give you a sense of the evidence they have, which will be introduced to prove true each statement of fact.

Then the facts together will be used to make their case.

Good luck. I'm rooting for you.
What's this, your 12th post on the subject? Yet you can't cite anything more than "believe me".
 
I'm sorry, since the days of the John Birchers, who are now morphed into the MAGA crowd, you morons have been calling dems that old extremely tired trope that we are 'commies' 'socialists' (as in the USSR kind ) for some 70 years now. Y'all just can't be taken seriously.
I'm a democrat who is going to vote democrat across the board and no one has ever mistaken or mislabeled me any of those things, [in fact it is only white liberals who get it wrong] yet you seem to think that all those folks down through time, most of whom do not know each other, can be wrong about you.
Now go pester someone else.
it's nice to see you working a new mantra rump. :spank:
 
What's this, your 12th post on the subject?
No idiot. It's like my 1000th. This has been discussed on this board ad nauseum.

If you are utterly ignorant of the material of the topic, that's your fault. You shouldn't even be opneing your mouth about it, in that case.

And you certainly should not be rudely asking other posters to spoonfeed you all of the basic facts of such a widely reported and discussed topic.
 
No idiot. It's like my 1000th. This has been discussed on this board ad nauseum.

If you are utterly ignorant of the material of the topic, that's your fault. You shouldn't even be opneing your mouth about it, in that case.

And you certainly should not be rudely asking other posters to spoonfeed you all of the basic facts of such a widely reported and discussed topic.
I read "I've said it 1000 times free of anything substantial. Please, just take my word for it".

Say leftist. Trump's coming after our democracy in liberal squawk squawk squawk. Kamala was installed without one in reality reality reality. Can you tell the difference?
 
I read "I've said it 1000 times free of anything substantial. Please, just take my word for it".
Wrong again.

I could not care less if some phony internet troll says they believe me or not.

Of course, I'm not an ignorant and lazy idiot and have read the indictments.

Reading is fundamental.
 
In reality, Trump still faces 2 criminal trials, with the third being ramped back up after Cannon is overturned.

In reality, the orange slob is running only to stay out of prison.

And that's good enough, for his adoring flock.
In reality….you don’t have one
 

Forum List

Back
Top