Does God Exist?

As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
.
one thing is certain, there was not a lack of light ...

View attachment 331846

primordial Earth. not a lot of water either. maybe it came in stages. oh, that must be the hours in a day. is that written in hebrew too.
In deference to Hollie, I will address this issue from the POV of science.
You mean YouTube?
No...science.
I will presume you have a PhD in some realm of hard science.
I do no, and I won't pretend on any message board that I do.
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Amun Ra. Obviously.
Bowel cleasning?
Science has a solution for your problem.
But you don't have any Links to these "solutions"?
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it".
By the way, the only time anyone in a scientists audience can even ask this blasphemous question is when an atheist scientist is debating an Orthodox Jewish scientist.
If this question comes up in from of any other audience the person is jeered, ridiculed and removed from the room.

Try asking a college professor and you'll get an F.
Your facts are rather absent facts.
I will have to presume that you have never attended college or a public lecture on the subject.
Fair enough.
If you say so.
Ad hominem...
What process, devoid of any matter whatsoever, produced the first particle?
I don't know.

What process, assuming magic, produced the first gods?
Why "gods"?
Why plural?
Why does it occur to you that an existence outside of our realm of existence is a plurality?
I think I know why...
You can't imagine "Something from what humans define as Nothing".

The essence of this discussion is that science is no closer to understanding matter from a compete absence of matter than it was yesterday or 1,000 years ago.
And science refuses to address that issue.
No need to concern yourself. The gawds did it. End of discussion.
You are not up to this discussion?
You can't find one video of a scientist discussing this issue?
You haven't tried hard enough to dismiss this.
OK.
At least you agree that scientists are completely dishonest in regards to this issue.
 
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
.
one thing is certain, there was not a lack of light ...

View attachment 331846

primordial Earth. not a lot of water either. maybe it came in stages. oh, that must be the hours in a day. is that written in hebrew too.
In deference to Hollie, I will address this issue from the POV of science.
You mean YouTube?
No...science.
I will presume you have a PhD in some realm of hard science.
I do no, and I won't pretend on any message board that I do.
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Amun Ra. Obviously.
Bowel cleasning?
Science has a solution for your problem.
But you don't have any Links to these "solutions"?
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it".
By the way, the only time anyone in a scientists audience can even ask this blasphemous question is when an atheist scientist is debating an Orthodox Jewish scientist.
If this question comes up in from of any other audience the person is jeered, ridiculed and removed from the room.

Try asking a college professor and you'll get an F.
Your facts are rather absent facts.
I will have to presume that you have never attended college or a public lecture on the subject.
Fair enough.
If you say so.
Ad hominem...
What process, devoid of any matter whatsoever, produced the first particle?
I don't know.

What process, assuming magic, produced the first gods?
Why "gods"?
Why plural?
Why does it occur to you that an existence outside of our realm of existence is a plurality?
I think I know why...
You can't imagine "Something from what humans define as Nothing".

The essence of this discussion is that science is no closer to understanding matter from a compete absence of matter than it was yesterday or 1,000 years ago.
And science refuses to address that issue.
No need to concern yourself. The gawds did it. End of discussion.
You are not up to this discussion?
You can't find one video of a scientist discussing this issue?
You haven't tried hard enough to dismiss this.
OK.
At least you agree that scientists are completely dishonest in regards to this issue.
If you say so.
 
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
.
one thing is certain, there was not a lack of light ...

View attachment 331846

primordial Earth. not a lot of water either. maybe it came in stages. oh, that must be the hours in a day. is that written in hebrew too.
In deference to Hollie, I will address this issue from the POV of science.
You mean YouTube?
No...science.
I will presume you have a PhD in some realm of hard science.
I do no, and I won't pretend on any message board that I do.
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Amun Ra. Obviously.
Bowel cleasning?
Science has a solution for your problem.
But you don't have any Links to these "solutions"?
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it".
By the way, the only time anyone in a scientists audience can even ask this blasphemous question is when an atheist scientist is debating an Orthodox Jewish scientist.
If this question comes up in from of any other audience the person is jeered, ridiculed and removed from the room.

Try asking a college professor and you'll get an F.
Your facts are rather absent facts.
I will have to presume that you have never attended college or a public lecture on the subject.
Fair enough.
If you say so.
Ad hominem...
What process, devoid of any matter whatsoever, produced the first particle?
I don't know.

What process, assuming magic, produced the first gods?
Why "gods"?
Why plural?
Why does it occur to you that an existence outside of our realm of existence is a plurality?
I think I know why...
You can't imagine "Something from what humans define as Nothing".

The essence of this discussion is that science is no closer to understanding matter from a compete absence of matter than it was yesterday or 1,000 years ago.
And science refuses to address that issue.
No need to concern yourself. The gawds did it. End of discussion.
You are not up to this discussion?
You can't find one video of a scientist discussing this issue?
You haven't tried hard enough to dismiss this.
OK.
At least you agree that scientists are completely dishonest in regards to this issue.
If you say so.
Actually, you're lack of a response or unwillingness to seek one out from a scientists who actually addresses this issue says so.

Now...
According to you science answers everything.
For almost all well known diseases diagnosed in the last 100 years, MDs must still almost always destroy one's body and quality of life to keep one alive.
Science has come a long way in seeing the problem, but they still can't actually address most problems without leaving damage.
 
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
.
one thing is certain, there was not a lack of light ...

View attachment 331846

primordial Earth. not a lot of water either. maybe it came in stages. oh, that must be the hours in a day. is that written in hebrew too.
In deference to Hollie, I will address this issue from the POV of science.
You mean YouTube?
No...science.
I will presume you have a PhD in some realm of hard science.
I do no, and I won't pretend on any message board that I do.
As noted fatty acids were also produced in Miller's experiment (most sources ignore this). "
a carboxylic acid consisting of a hydrocarbon chain and a terminal carboxyl group ....
a fatty acid is a carboxylic acid with a long aliphatic chain, which is either saturated or unsaturated."

I posted above about carboxylic acids in general. The carboxyl group is a carbon atom double bonded to an Oxygen atom and single bonded to to a hydroxyl group (-OH). A hydrocarbon is a molecule with Hydrogen and Carbon (e.g. Methane = CH4). An aliphatic chain consists of hydrocarbons that form an open chain as in fatty acids and alkanes to be distinguished from hydrocarbon chains which form rings instead of open chains. Alkanes are saturated hydrocarbons like methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8). Saturated hydrocarbons have single bonds between hydrogen atoms - the highest possible number of hydrogen atoms (e.g. methane/CH4) while unsaturated hydrocarbons have double or triple bonds between adjacent carbon atoms and thus can have hydrogen atoms added to make the compound saturated.

More from the Thaxton et al link concerning carboxylic acids from page 55:

"In a similar fashion, growing polypeptides would be terminated by reactions with amines, aldehydes, ketones, reducing sugars* or carboxylic acids. If by some remote chance a true protein did develop in the ocean, its viability would be predictably of short duration. For example, formaldehyde would readily react with free amino groups to form methylene cross-linkages between proteins.37 This would tie up certain reactive sites, and retard the reaction of protein with other chemical agents. To illustrate, "irreversible combination of formaldehyde with asparagine amide groups" would result in a compound which is "stable to dilute boiling phosphoric acid."38 This tying up process is the principle of the well-known tanning reaction, and is used similarly to retard cadaver decay. "In general, reaction with formaldehyde hardens proteins, decreases their water-sensitivity, and increases their resistance to the action of chemical reagents and enzymes."39 Survival of proteins in the soup would have been difficult indeed."

Footnote:

"It is interesting to note that in certain abnormal situations, such as diabetes, the carbonyl group of glucose will form chemical bonds with the amino group of cellular proteins, a process called glycosylation. (See A.L. Notkins, 1975. Sci. Amer. 241,62.)" [Not so good for life!]

Bottom line: carboxylic acids will react with peptides and stop further polymerization. Also the carbonyl group (CO double bonded) in sugars will react with the amino group (NH2) in peptides (and in amines in general). Both sugars (as in RNA) and amines (as in amino acids) are required for life and yet they interact and, in effect: destroy each other!

to be continued later. I'll give you all a chance to review the actual evidence in chemistry relevant to the origin of life and specifically to Miller's experiment.

Again, one needs an intelligent chemist (e.g. God) to create life - and human chemists are inferior creators and cannot create life. Some attribute the attributes of God to Chance! Not a chance!

Actually, we find that supernaturalism is not a requirement for life on the planet.

Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained a massive number of chemicals that reacted with each other more or less randomly, and it is unclear how the complexity of cells could have emerged from such chemical chaos. Now, a team led by Tony Z. Jia at the Tokyo Institute of Technology and Kuhan Chandru of the National University of Malaysia has shown that simple α-hydroxy acids, like glycolic and lactic acid, spontaneously polymerize and self-assemble into polyester microdroplets when dried at moderate temperatures followed by rehydration. This could be what happened along primitive beaches and river banks, or in drying puddles. These form a new type of cell-like compartment that can trap and concentrate biomolecules like nucleic acids and proteins. These droplets, unlike most modern cells, are able to merge and reform easily, and thus could have hosted versatile early genetic and metabolic systems potentially critical for the origins of life.


All life on Earth is made up of cells. Cells are composed of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, with the lipid forming the cell membrane, an enclosure that keeps the other components together and interfaces with the environment, exchanging food and waste. How molecular assemblages as complex as cells originally formed remains a mystery.

Most origins of life research focuses on how the molecules and structures of life were produced by the environment, and then assembled into structures that led to the first cells. However, there were likely many other types of molecules that formed alongside biomolecules on early Earth, and it is possible that life started using very simple chemistry unrelated to modern biomolecules, then evolved through increasingly complex stages to give rise to the structures found in modern cells.

Previous work conducted at ELSI showed that moderate temperature drying of the simple organic compounds known as alpha-hydroxy acids, which are found in meteorites and many simulations of prebiological chemistry, spontaneously polymerizes them into mixtures of long polyesters. Building on this work, Jia and colleagues took the next step and examined these reactions under the microscope, and found that these mixed polyester systems form a gel phase and spontaneously self-assemble when rewetted to form simple cell-like structures.

The most challenging aspect of this work was devising new methods to characterize the droplets' properties and functions, as no one had analyzed such systems before. Jia noted that the team was fortunate to have such a diversity of multidisciplinary expertise, including chemists, biochemists, materials scientists and geologists. After determining their composition and showing their propensity to self-assemble, the next question was whether these cell-like structures might be able to do something chemically useful. Modern cell membranes perform many crucial functions that help maintain the cell, for example, retaining macromolecules and metabolites in one place, as well as providing a constant internal environment, which can be very different from the one outside the cell. They first measured how stable these structures were and found they could persist for very long periods depending on the environmental conditions, but could also be made to merge and coalesce.

They then tested the ability of these structures to sequester molecules from the environment and found they accumulated large dye molecules to a remarkable degree. They then showed that these droplets could also host RNA and protein molecules and still permit them to be functionally catalytic. Further, the team showed that the droplets could assist in the formation of a lipid layer on their surface, suggesting they could have helped scaffold protocell formation.


Jia and colleagues are not certain these structures are the direct ancestors of cells, but they think it is possible such droplets could have enabled the assembly of protocells on Earth. The new compartmentalization system they have found is extremely simple, they note, and could form easily in primitive environments throughout the universe. Says Jia, "This allows us to imagine non-biological systems on early Earth that could still have had a hand in the origins of life. This suggests there may be many other non-biological systems that should be targets of future investigations of this type." He thinks the development of these or similar model systems could allow better study of the evolution of diverse chemical systems representative of the complex chemistries likely to be found on primitive planetary bodies.

"The early Earth was certainly a messy place chemically," Jia explains, "and often, most origins of life studies focus on modern biomolecules under relatively 'clean' conditions. Perhaps it is important to take these 'messy' mixtures and see if there are interesting functions or structures that can arise from them spontaneously." The authors now think that by systematically increasing the chemical complexity of such systems, they will be able to observe how they evolve over time and possibly discover divergent and emergent properties.

"We have this new experimental system we can now play with, so we can start to study phenomena like evolution and evolvability of these droplets. The possible combinations of structures or functions these droplets might have are almost endless. If the physical rules that govern the formation of droplets are fairly universal in nature, then we hope to study similar systems to discover whether they also can form microdroplets with novel properties," adds Jia.

Finally, while the team is presently focused on understanding the origins of life, they note this basic research could have applications in other areas, for example, drug delivery and personalized medicine. "This is just a wonderful example of the unexpected ways projects can develop when a team of diverse scientists from around the world come together to try and understand new and interesting phenomena," said team member Jim Cleaves, also of ELSI.


"Before life began on Earth, the environment likely contained "
Curious...Where did the environment come from?
Amun Ra. Obviously.
Bowel cleasning?
Science has a solution for your problem.
But you don't have any Links to these "solutions"?
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it".
By the way, the only time anyone in a scientists audience can even ask this blasphemous question is when an atheist scientist is debating an Orthodox Jewish scientist.
If this question comes up in from of any other audience the person is jeered, ridiculed and removed from the room.

Try asking a college professor and you'll get an F.
Your facts are rather absent facts.
I will have to presume that you have never attended college or a public lecture on the subject.
Fair enough.
If you say so.
Ad hominem...
What process, devoid of any matter whatsoever, produced the first particle?
I don't know.

What process, assuming magic, produced the first gods?
Why "gods"?
Why plural?
Why does it occur to you that an existence outside of our realm of existence is a plurality?
I think I know why...
You can't imagine "Something from what humans define as Nothing".

The essence of this discussion is that science is no closer to understanding matter from a compete absence of matter than it was yesterday or 1,000 years ago.
And science refuses to address that issue.
No need to concern yourself. The gawds did it. End of discussion.
You are not up to this discussion?
You can't find one video of a scientist discussing this issue?
You haven't tried hard enough to dismiss this.
OK.
At least you agree that scientists are completely dishonest in regards to this issue.
If you say so.
Actually, you're lack of a response or unwillingness to seek one out from a scientists who actually addresses this issue says so.

Now...
According to you science answers everything.
For almost all well known diseases diagnosed in the last 100 years, MDs must still almost always destroy one's body and quality of life to keep one alive.
Science has come a long way in seeing the problem, but they still can't actually address most problems without leaving damage.
That's fine.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
Who did you "waste" with your silly diatribes?
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
at the moment of singularity matter had completely been converted to energy - so maybe you might consider where energy came from as well - the metaphysical got mad and blew it up or the state of purity can not be maintained - energy wanted a way to have sex ...
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
Who did you "waste" with your silly diatribes?
Hmmmm...I'm still waiting for that scientist rather than waiting for an ad hominem.
Do you ever loot at yourself in the mirror and see the expression on your face when you won't answer a question for which your emotions can't handle the answer?
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
Who did you "waste" with your silly diatribes?
Hmmmm...I'm still waiting for that scientist rather than waiting for an ad hominem.
Do you ever loot at yourself in the mirror and see the expression on your face when you won't answer a question for which your emotions can't handle the answer?
Another of your silly diatribes.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
at the moment of singularity matter had completely been converted to energy - so maybe you might consider where energy came from as well - the metaphysical got mad and blew it up or the state of purity can not be maintained - energy wanted a way to have sex ...
If you can read Hebrew The Singularity constantly creates the matter by "voiding" itself to make room for matter which exists solely by dint of Singularity thought.
You will do well to check out tzim tzum.
I cannot do this justice as I haven't gone through it for 20+ years.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
I just wasted Hollie and now you want me to waste you also?
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
Go...find a video somewhere where some scientist addresses this; the video doesn't exist except where the scientist makes a statement like, "It;s almost as though a god did it".
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.

I can't wait for your next ad hominem.
Who did you "waste" with your silly diatribes?
Hmmmm...I'm still waiting for that scientist rather than waiting for an ad hominem.
Do you ever loot at yourself in the mirror and see the expression on your face when you won't answer a question for which your emotions can't handle the answer?
Another of your silly diatribes.
You define a diatribe as a mere 2-3 sentences?
You much have quite a short attention span when you allow your emotions to take hold of your intellect.
 
Tell us how science addresses the issue of creating matter from a complete absence of matter.
I am not your assistant. If you have a point to make, make it. You know, we rational, sane people know that all you are doing here is trying to mask the fact that you have absolutely no fucking idea what you are talking about.

So, make your point. In your own words. "Destroy me", professor.
You can't find such a because scientists, who get a paycheck like everyone else, can't answer a question for which no theories exist.
So, THAT'S your point? That no theories exist stating how a universe with matter in it could have emerged from a state with no matter in it?

Well, that's hilariously stupid and wrong. There is:

- Zero-energy theory
- Asymmetry hypothesis (symmetry breaking that leaves behind matter)

Then there are theories that propose that what you suggest never happened (nothing, then something)

- Conformal Cyclic Cosmology

These ideas are on the cutting edge of cosmology. So, when you say "almost all " scientists say they cant think of a single explanation, you're a lying little turd.
 
And when these scientists -- almost assuredly atheists -- say, "its almost like god dit it!", its not a nod to god's greatness, its a nod to the notion of saying "god did it!" and having "utter ignorance" being the same idea.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...

I didn't think Indeependent or Ding were quoting from the book "The Mystery of Life's Origin - reassessing current theories" by Charles B. Thaxton Walter L. Bradley Roger L. Olsen:


So, do you disagree with any of the evidence from chemistry presented in that book?
 
Fort Fun Indiana - Do you think the law of conservation of matter and energy was violated at the origin of the universe?

Also, did you realize that "nothing" can contain something? For example, dark matter and dark energy.

Note also String theories. No string's attached?

Job 26:7 states that the earth is hung upon nothing in empty space. Newton discovered what that nothing is: gravity. But show us a picture of a graviton!
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...

I didn't think Indeependent or Ding were quoting from the book "The Mystery of Life's Origin - reassessing current theories" by Charles B. Thaxton Walter L. Bradley Roger L. Olsen:


So, do you disagree with any of the evidence from chemistry presented in that book?
Never heard of it let alone read it. Sounds interesting though.
 
Fact...Every scientist on YouTube, when asked where the first piece of matter came about, always answers, "It's almost as though a god created it"
Hahahaha


Dude.

That is not a "fact". You literally just pulled that right out of your ass.
How many lectures on this subject and how many YouTube videos have you watched where someone asked this question.
It's a simple question...answer it.
I am not your assistant. Tell us the lie about "almost all" of the scientists again. That was a good one.
Wow!
You haven't changed a bit in the last year.
Tell us again from which University you received your Science Degree.
Irrelevant.

This is how you frauds always act when you are caught in a silly lie. Ding, you, this newtonian fellow...all operating from the same charlatan playbook...
This is you projecting. Besides your inability to have adult conversations you have a nasty habit of accusing others of what you do.
 

Forum List

Back
Top