Iceweasel
Diamond Member
I've always said it depends on the child. Good parents sometimes have troublesome kids for whatever reason. I agree with spanking in that case because if the kid doesn't learn to control himself then, he is going to learn it later when the consequences are bigger.First, I was sloppy in my language. I meant to say "those who insist that physical punishment is required to rear children successfully" rather than "those who defend physical punishment". IOW my objection is not with parents using and defending physical punishment, but with those who argue that it is required to rear children properly.
I never said it. You have me mixed up with someone else.Most kids were spanked, so if they are undisciplined, spanking does not seem to correct them. I know of many highly successful, happy, self-confident, and productive individuals who were never physically disciplined as a child. You seem to persist in thinking that these people do not exist. Why do you spend so much effort trying to deny this existence? Does it threaten you to admit they exist?
My extremist position is that there's a difference between spanking and beating.Why are you defending the extremist position? And isn't this the very position you started your post with by accusing me of creating it as a straw man?