Does the GOP wish Obama left the country the way Bush left it.

[kaz]

True enough....and Obama made it worse.

Show me "worse"....

Yeah...making the 1% richer, is what Big Ears is all about...and the dumb average leftist gets duped again.

No president can stop the concentration of wealth at the top. But congress can. Who's in charge there, anyway?

You mindless leftists endlessly repeat that inane point without ever saying your plan for how an economy that removes the incentive from job providers to work won't kill jobs down the chain. Why are you so much more obsessed with what others have rather than what you have?

Well, which is it? Are undertaxed rich folks creating jobs right and left, or is our unemployment rate really 25%-30%.

Pick one.

Fallacy of single cause

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Ray

You apparently have no idea what full employment means....

And you apparently don't understand the impact of the labor participate rate in relation to the so-called unemployment figures.

The more people that drop out of the workforce, the lower the unemployment numbers go even if one job was not created. In other words, the unemployment numbers are phony.

 

[kaz]

True enough....and Obama made it worse.

Show me "worse"....

Yeah...making the 1% richer, is what Big Ears is all about...and the dumb average leftist gets duped again.

No president can stop the concentration of wealth at the top. But congress can. Who's in charge there, anyway?

You mindless leftists endlessly repeat that inane point without ever saying your plan for how an economy that removes the incentive from job providers to work won't kill jobs down the chain. Why are you so much more obsessed with what others have rather than what you have?

What incentive for job providers to work has been removed?

Redistribution of the money we earn for working more. I mean duh, Larry

 

[kaz]

Ray

You apparently have no idea what full employment means....

And you apparently don't understand the impact of the labor participate rate in relation to the so-called unemployment figures.

The more people that drop out of the workforce, the lower the unemployment numbers go even if one job was not created. In other words, the unemployment numbers are phony.

It's like explaining economics to an eight year old, isn't it? You just can't dumb down the concepts enough

 

[IcebergSlim]

Yeah, I just don't know how this country can survive with full employment and a record high stock market.

Full employment? We have a record low labor participation rate. That means over one-third of Americans of working age are not working nor looking for a job, plus the Americans who are not working and looking for a job.

Ray

You apparently have no idea what full employment means....

If you don't understand what he said, obviously you don't know what "full employment" means. He told you in his sentence both what it means and what's misleading about it

So you don't have any idea either.....

I'm not surprised...

Btw, the denominator of LFPR is everyone over 16 who is not in an institution.....calling them all "working age" is a bit idiotic, don't you think?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It's like explaining economics to an eight year old, isn't it? You just can't dumb down the concepts enough

You have to laugh otherwise you'd cry. It's just like Faun bragging about our stock market. He (she) doesn't realize that the stock market is what it is due to the trillions of dollars the feds pumped into it. The market is not reflective of our economic success. Like the housing bubble, it's just an artificial bubble. All bubbles burst.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Show me "worse"....

Yeah...making the 1% richer, is what Big Ears is all about...and the dumb average leftist gets duped again.

No president can stop the concentration of wealth at the top. But congress can. Who's in charge there, anyway?

You mindless leftists endlessly repeat that inane point without ever saying your plan for how an economy that removes the incentive from job providers to work won't kill jobs down the chain. Why are you so much more obsessed with what others have rather than what you have?

What incentive for job providers to work has been removed?

Redistribution of the money we earn for working more. I mean duh, Larry

Where do they find you Idiots?

How does the current federal tax burden compare to the average of the past 50 years?

If job creators are so disincentivized, why are we seeing higher rates of job growth than at any time during Supply Side Idiocy, Parte Deux?

 

[Faun]

Yeah, I just don't know how this country can survive with full employment and a record high stock market.

Full employment? We have a record low labor participation rate. That means over one-third of Americans of working age are not working nor looking for a job, plus the Americans who are not working and looking for a job.

Yes, full employment. What a shame you're too delirious to recognize reality.

Over a third of Americans were not looking for work before Obama became president. 94% of that third of Americans don't want a job. And the labor force participation rate is not an indicator of the health of the job markets; whereas, the unemployment rate is. And despite your ignorance, it indicates we are at full employment.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's like explaining economics to an eight year old, isn't it? You just can't dumb down the concepts enough

You have to laugh otherwise you'd cry. It's just like Faun bragging about our stock market. He (she) doesn't realize that the stock market is what it is due to the trillions of dollars the feds pumped into it. The market is not reflective of our economic success. Like the housing bubble, it's just an artificial bubble. All bubbles burst.

The markets are full of "funny money"...lots of people making money in it but the bubble is doomed to burst and when it does it will be ugly

 

[IcebergSlim]

It's like explaining economics to an eight year old, isn't it? You just can't dumb down the concepts enough

You have to laugh otherwise you'd cry. It's just like Faun bragging about our stock market. He (she) doesn't realize that the stock market is what it is due to the trillions of dollars the feds pumped into it. The market is not reflective of our economic success. Like the housing bubble, it's just an artificial bubble. All bubbles burst.

Do you understand the fundamentals of equity valuation?

 

[IcebergSlim]

It's like explaining economics to an eight year old, isn't it? You just can't dumb down the concepts enough

You have to laugh otherwise you'd cry. It's just like Faun bragging about our stock market. He (she) doesn't realize that the stock market is what it is due to the trillions of dollars the feds pumped into it. The market is not reflective of our economic success. Like the housing bubble, it's just an artificial bubble. All bubbles burst.

The markets are full of "funny money"...lots of people making money in it but the bubble is doomed to burst and when it does it will be ugly

You really have no idea, do you?

 

[Faun]

Yeah, I just don't know how this country can survive with full employment and a record high stock market.

Full employment? We have a record low labor participation rate. That means over one-third of Americans of working age are not working nor looking for a job, plus the Americans who are not working and looking for a job.

Ray

You apparently have no idea what full employment means....

If you don't understand what he said, obviously you don't know what "full employment" means. He told you in his sentence both what it means and what's misleading about it

Stop kazzing. The labor force participation rate has nothing to do with full employment.

 

[Faun]

Bush left behind a disaster, and no amount of spin, deflection or denial can change that fact.

True enough....and Obama made it worse.

Show me "worse"....

Yeah...making the 1% richer, is what Big Ears is all about...and the dumb average leftist gets duped again.

No president can stop the concentration of wealth at the top. But congress can. Who's in charge there, anyway?

Yeah because republicans have always been in control, right?

They were from 1995 until 2007. But they had nothing to do with the economy cratering, right, pinhead?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Yes, full employment. What a shame you're too delirious to recognize reality.

Over a third of Americans were not looking for work before Obama became president. 94% of that third of Americans don't want a job. And the labor force participation rate is not an indicator of the health of the job markets; whereas, the unemployment rate is. And despite your ignorance, it indicates we are at full employment.

Just for you public school victims, let's try this again:

The more people that drop out of the workforce, the lower the unemployment numbers go. The lower the unemployment numbers, you will eventually cross that threshold of what is considered Full Employment.

If you take away those who dropped out of the workforce, we are nowhere near Full Employment.

 

[nat4900]

You mindless leftists endlessly repeat that inane point without ever saying your plan for how an economy that removes the incentive from job providers to work won't kill jobs down the chain.

Oh, how "accurate", since that "trickle-down" economic incentives have worked so fucking well in the last 3 plus decades, right???

 

[rdean]

You are not only a stupid bitch, you add hypocrite to the list. Nice. Real fucking nice.

Get back on topic, Wilbuuuuuur. It's about what a disaster Obama is

No, the question was:

Does the GOP wish Obama left the country the way Bush left it

Derp...I choose to talk about the disaster your BOY is, you want to whine about something that happened eight years ago and claim Obungles fixed it and it's not true

Gassy,

It's about time for you to throw a hissy and leave...

Either get on topic or you leave, understand troll? You clowns want to blame Bush for something that was put in place long before he was president and ignore what a fucked up disaster your boy is. Now grow the fuck up and stop your middle school antics, I am unimpressed, clown

Obama’s Numbers April 2016 Update

Right wingers get so upset with me because of all those dang "facts" I post, sometimes, I just let the fuckers spew until they've run out of gas. Oh, by the way, gas costs way less now than under Bush.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Do you understand the fundamentals of equity valuation?

No, why don't you explain it to us?

 

[rdean]

Yes, full employment. What a shame you're too delirious to recognize reality.

Over a third of Americans were not looking for work before Obama became president. 94% of that third of Americans don't want a job. And the labor force participation rate is not an indicator of the health of the job markets; whereas, the unemployment rate is. And despite your ignorance, it indicates we are at full employment.

Just for you public school victims, let's try this again:

The more people that drop out of the workforce, the lower the unemployment numbers go. The lower the unemployment numbers, you will eventually cross that threshold of what is considered Full Employment.

If you take away those who dropped out of the workforce, we are nowhere near Full Employment.

View attachment 88327

You mean like the retired, the elderly, the disabled and children? You're right, they should be "employed".

 

[nat4900]

You mindless leftists endlessly repeat that inane point without ever saying your plan for how an economy that removes the incentive from job providers to work won't kill jobs down the chain. Why are you so much more obsessed with what others have rather than what you have?

here's one review of Trump's "great" economic plan.....

"More than one-third of the proposed tax cuts on personal income will go to the top 1% of income earners, with the average taxpayer in this group receiving a reduction in their tax bill of $275,000. Taxpayers in the bottom 99% of income earners will receive a tax cut of less than $2,500," Moody's writes.

 

[Eaglewings]

Do Republicans remember how the country was when Obama became president. The economy, the stock market, the wars, employment and so on? The car industry, the steel industry, the rubber industry and so on?

Credit card companies? Health care?

Do they wish he had done nothing?

How would things be different?

Obama is a man with integrity whom if he did had fucking scandal like most of the presidents behind him, the nasty ones who wanted to see him fail from day one would have never stopped ... But since he has managed to be a calm man who stood by Michelle , the nasty right has to lie like this stupid ass thread.

Also to add that the left stood by Bill Clinton's side even thought he blew it , literally...lol

The Right turned their backs on poor Bush after they used him, chewed him up, and spit him out to the wolves.



.