- Jan 15, 2009
- 65,677
- 40,932
Damn......I hate it when I'm wrong.The author of that article makes a fatal assumption.
He is asasuming that employers will add their cost back into the paychecks of employees so that they will receive 15.3% more pay but employers are not going to be forced to do that so people will see only a 7.65% increase
NO one is "assuming" that the employer is going to pay the employee what they usually pay to the government unless the government relieves the employer of the obligation to the government.
Politicians from both parties have borrowed (raided) from SS several times, and have not repaid it.
Are you this much of a hack that you can't even admit to the truth, Penny? WELL, ARE YOU?
This myth, "Politicians from both parties have borrowed (raided) from SS several times, and have not repaid it.", has been proven false for decades. I guess it never got around to you and the other intentionally ignorant Progressives.
Are you this much of a hack that you can't even admit to the truth, Meister? WELL, ARE YOU?
"Somewhere between Social Security going "on-budget" in 1969 and today, Americans believe the program's spare cash was raided, used to fund wars, and never repaid, leaving seniors high and dry. However, this isn't the case.
Here's the truth: Social Security's asset reserves have been borrowed by the federal government, but this borrowing is required by law. The Social Security Administration invests the program's asset reserves into special-issue bonds and, to a lesser extent, certificates of indebtedness. In turn, the federal government utilizes this cash to fund all types of budget line items. This might include defense spending, but it may also include social programs, education, and healthcare. Money borrowed from Social Security isn't earmarked for any federal spending program, in particular, so suggesting that the borrowing was done solely to fund wars isn't correct."
[...]
"In addition, what most folks are probably overlooking is that Social Security is being paid interest on what it's lent to Congress. The combination of various maturities and yields on its special-issue bonds worked out to an average interest rate of 2.844% at the end of April. In 2018, interest income led to just over $83 billion in revenue collection, or a little more than 8% of all the money Social Security collected last year."
![]()
The Fallacy of the "Government Raid" on Social Security | The Motley Fool
Did Congress really steal your hard-earned money?www.fool.com