OhPleaseJustQuit
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2021
- 52,161
- 62,069
- 3,488
.It was an attempt to overthrow the elected government of the United States so yeah it was an insurrection you fascist moron.
I know, I know.
With selfie sticks.
![itsok :itsok: :itsok:](/styles/smilies/itsok.gif)
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.It was an attempt to overthrow the elected government of the United States so yeah it was an insurrection you fascist moron.
I’m going to try an experiment. I’m going to run into the police station with my selfie stick, demand all cops relinquish their weapons, and require them to drop to the floor..
I know, I know.
With selfie sticks.
.
Posting incendiary tweets aimed directly at the insurrectionists -- instead of telling them to stop -- is pretty clear cut incitement.Your definition of "incitement" is clearly different from mine.
These thugs attacked the unarmed members of the US Senate and House, because they wanted to install your Russian compromised guy as president.Yup. These 200 people with their zip-ties and selfie sticks thought they could overtake the strength of a fully-armed U.S. military. Uh-huh.membe
.I’m going to try an experiment. I’m going to run into the police station with my selfie stick, demand all cops relinquish their weapons, and require them to drop to the floor.
If you don’t hear from me, it means I was arrested. If you do, it means I took control of the police station.
Wish me luck!!
.Posting incendiary tweets aimed directly at the insurrectionists -- instead of telling them to stop -- is pretty clear cut incitement.
Right back at ya!.
Folks, this is why I love this girl!
.
"Your definition of "incitement" is clearly different from mine.
"the action of provoking unlawful behaviour or urging someone to behave unlawfully." so yeah your Russian compromised guy did incite the violent insurrection.Your definition of "incitement" is clearly different from mine.
Nonsense.Posting incendiary tweets aimed directly at the insurrectionists -- instead of telling them to stop -- is pretty clear cut incitement.
."
"the action of provoking unlawful behaviour or urging someone to behave unlawfully." so yeah your Russian compromised guy did incite the violent insurrection.
So you do admit the attack was a violent attempt to overthrow the elected US government. Thanks, now run along..
I know, I know.
With selfie sticks.
.
.So you do admit the attack was a violent attempt to overthrow the elected US government. Thanks, now run along.
/---/ Then President Trump's lawyers should call and the former chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steben Sund who said security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into the attack on Congress and Nancy Piglosi in for a sworn deposition on the -- ya know -- that thing. They could also subpoena the hours and hours on video surveillance as evidence.Trump Can be Sued For January 6 Riot Injuries.
![]()
Trump can be sued for Jan. 6 riot harm, Justice Dept. says
The Justice Department says Donald Trump can be sued by injured Capitol Police officers and Democratic lawmakers over the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.apnews.com
WASHINGTON (AP) — Former President Donald Trump can be sued by injured Capitol Police officers and Democratic lawmakers over the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, the Justice Department said Thursday in a federal court case testing Trump’s legal vulnerability and the limits of executive power.
Although a president enjoys broad legal latitude to communicate to the public on matters of concern, the department wrote that “no part of a President’s official responsibilities includes the incitement of imminent private violence. By definition, such conduct plainly falls outside the President’s constitutional and statutory duties.”
The brief was filed by lawyers of the Justice Department’s Civil Division and has no bearing on a separate criminal investigation by a department special counsel into whether Trump can be criminally charged over efforts to undo President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 presidential election ahead of the Capitol riot. In fact, the lawyers note that they are not taking a position with respect to potential criminal liability for Trump or anyone else.
That red herring won't help the orange slob or his criminal co conspirators./---/ Then President Trump's lawyers should call and the former chief of U.S. Capitol Police Steben Sund who said security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into the attack on Congress and Nancy Piglosi in for a sworn deposition on the -- ya know -- that thing. They could also subpoena the hours and hours on video surveillance as evidence.
/---/ What red herring? Anyway, bring it on.That red herring won't help the orange slob or his criminal co conspirators.
This is your guy..
Nice.......um...... I mean lame try, loser.
Please refer to post #162.
Then
But thanks for your thought provoking post.
.
Your entire fantasy. As if it's anyone's fault but Trump and his cult that his cult attempted an insurrection. It's not going to work, sorry./---/ What red herring? Anyway, bring it on.
I would agree IF we had a loser pays legal system.That's ok, if they fail then they were not worthy. But people should have the right to file them.
.
Doesn't matter. The definitive authority in the matter-- a judge -- ruled that they have basis.I would agree IF we had a loser pays legal system.