DOMA ruled unconstitutional

[MaxCha]

And?

1. 2. 3. 4. There we go.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The 9th circuit court of appeals? Are you shiting me? Are you talking about the same court that has had the more over turned decision of any appellant of in America?

I still remember the thread you started attacking Obama based on you miscounting the number 4. You called me a fucking liar for saying 47 minus 43 is 4, and posted multiple times telling us morons the answer is 3.

Next comes learning your ABC'S, then maybe a stance in politics.

_____________________

Yeah, DOMA needs to be thrown out. I do think Clinton is two-faced for making efforts to appeal to pro-equality voters yet at the same time signing DOMA in silence.

Here I hope you have learned something

U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most decisions by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most 9th Circuit decisions - Los Angeles Times
All shit goes to Hawaii.

bump

 

[Seawytch]

DOMA has been found unconstitutional by at least three federal courts now. This latest ruling was made by Republican justices so the "9th circuit court" card can't be played. A federal bankruptcy court found DOMA unconstitutional as well.

Looking at precedent, the SCOTUS has no other option than to rule in favor of gay marriage equality.

The 9th circuit court of appeals? Are you shiting me? Are you talking about the same court that has had the more over turned decision of any appellant of in America?

Try sounding out the words when you read. The latest ruling comes from the 1st District Court not the 9th.

Which court hears the most cases, I wonder?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

DOMA has been found unconstitutional by at least three federal courts now. This latest ruling was made by Republican justices so the "9th circuit court" card can't be played. A federal bankruptcy court found DOMA unconstitutional as well.

Looking at precedent, the SCOTUS has no other option than to rule in favor of gay marriage equality.

The 9th circuit court of appeals? Are you shiting me? Are you talking about the same court that has had the more over turned decision of any appellant of in America?

Try sounding out the words when you read. The latest ruling comes from the 1st District Court not the 9th.

Which court hears the most cases, I wonder?

There is no surprise that a court in Gayston would rule the DOMA unconstitutional it's not surprising at all.

 

[Mr.Nick]

DOMA has been found unconstitutional by at least three federal courts now. This latest ruling was made by Republican justices so the "9th circuit court" card can't be played. A federal bankruptcy court found DOMA unconstitutional as well.

Looking at precedent, the SCOTUS has no other option than to rule in favor of gay marriage equality.

That's because progressives don't give a fuck about law....

IMO, I don't even think government should recognize marriage, not to mention there is NOTHING in the fucking Constitution about marriage...

Marriage isn't a right - nor will it ever be.

What is the next step in this stupid fucking gay marriage plan?? - force Churches to marry gay couples because marriage is a right???

This nonsense is a slippery slope. And don't pull that "slippery slope fallacy" bullshit either because the slippery slope exists. The slippery slope is nothing more than another name for "precedence."

 

[WinterBorn]

And why would there be any doubt that a lower court in Massachusetts would say that the DOMA is unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts state laws.
I will add that any state that recognized gay married the doma should not restrict that state . But any state that does not recognize same sex marriages they should not be force to do that.

And just for your continued education, the court that made teh ruling was not a lower court in Mass. It was a federal appeals court. One step below the US Supreme Court.

Continued education? You must first have something of value to be considered educational. Stupid shit is not.

You are the one who said, "And why would there be any doubt that a lower court in Massachusetts would say that the DOMA is unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts state laws".

The fact that the ruling did not come from a lower court and was not about Massachusetts law shows you needed some education.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And just for your continued education, the court that made teh ruling was not a lower court in Mass. It was a federal appeals court. One step below the US Supreme Court.

Continued education? You must first have something of value to be considered educational. Stupid shit is not.

You are the one who said, "And why would there be any doubt that a lower court in Massachusetts would say that the DOMA is unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts state laws".

The fact that the ruling did not come from a lower court and was not about Massachusetts law shows you needed some education.

Did the ruling come from the supreme court if it did not it came from a lower court. So try again with your stupid shit.

 

[MaxCha]

I still remember the thread you started attacking Obama based on you miscounting the number 4. You called me a fucking liar for saying 47 minus 43 is 4, and posted multiple times telling us morons the answer is 3.

Next comes learning your ABC'S, then maybe a stance in politics.

_____________________

Yeah, DOMA needs to be thrown out. I do think Clinton is two-faced for making efforts to appeal to pro-equality voters yet at the same time signing DOMA in silence.

Here I hope you have learned something

U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most decisions by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most 9th Circuit decisions - Los Angeles Times
All shit goes to Hawaii.

bump

Haha, thanks to the other poster for actually looking at the articles and seeing it was the 1st Circuit Court that made the ruling, not the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Literally every single time you introduce evidence, bigreb, you either forget how to count or how to read, if you read it at all.

 

[WinterBorn]

Continued education? You must first have something of value to be considered educational. Stupid shit is not.

You are the one who said, "And why would there be any doubt that a lower court in Massachusetts would say that the DOMA is unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts state laws".

The fact that the ruling did not come from a lower court and was not about Massachusetts law shows you needed some education.

Did the ruling come from the supreme court if it did not it came from a lower court. So try again with your stupid shit.

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Here I hope you have learned something

U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most decisions by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals: U.S. Supreme Court again rejects most 9th Circuit decisions - Los Angeles Times
All shit goes to Hawaii.

bump

Haha, thanks to the other poster for actually looking at the articles and seeing it was the 1st Circuit Court that made the ruling, not the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Literally every single time you introduce evidence, bigreb, you either forget how to count or how to read, if you read it at all.

Dumb ass who was the first one who mentioned the 9th circuit? Either you forgot who was the first to mention it

DOMA has been found unconstitutional by at least three federal courts now. This latest ruling was made by Republican justices so the "9th circuit court" card can't be played. A federal bankruptcy court found DOMA unconstitutional as well.

Looking at precedent, the SCOTUS has no other option than to rule in favor of gay marriage equality.

I made the point clear that the 9th circuit is the court that has a problem getting it's rulings over turn by the supreme court.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You are the one who said, "And why would there be any doubt that a lower court in Massachusetts would say that the DOMA is unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts state laws".

The fact that the ruling did not come from a lower court and was not about Massachusetts law shows you needed some education.

Did the ruling come from the supreme court if it did not it came from a lower court. So try again with your stupid shit.

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

 

[WinterBorn]

Did the ruling come from the supreme court if it did not it came from a lower court. So try again with your stupid shit.

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

The second highest court in the land? lol

So tell us all how DOMA was found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

 

[Seawytch]

Did the ruling come from the supreme court if it did not it came from a lower court. So try again with your stupid shit.

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

It's one of three or four now...all leading to the SCOTUS. When you look at precedent, there's only one way they can rule...gay marriage legalized.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

It's one of three or four now...all leading to the SCOTUS. When you look at precedent, there's only one way they can rule...gay marriage legalized.

WinterBorn is saying the first circuit court of appeals is not a lower court.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The Federal court of Appeals is not a lower court. But even if you dance passed that one, tell us again about how it found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

Was the ruling about Massachusetts law? Yes or No? lol

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

The second highest court in the land? lol

So tell us all how DOMA was found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

You're very dishonest
The first circuit court of appeals is a lower court and you're saying it's not. Faggots in the Massachusetts courts will say it's unconstitutional that's all they have to go on.

 

[WinterBorn]

The 1st U.S. Circuit Court is a lower court dumb ass.

http://www.usmessageboard.com/5369990-post1.html

The second highest court in the land? lol

So tell us all how DOMA was found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

You're very dishonest
The first circuit court of appeals is a lower court and you're saying it's not. Faggots in the Massachusetts courts will say it's unconstitutional that's all they have to go on.

LMAO!! So the Massachusetts court justices have only state laws to go on when they rule something to be in violation of the US Constitution?? Are you serious??

You are actually claiming the federal appeals court justices only have Mass. law to go on?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The second highest court in the land? lol

So tell us all how DOMA was found unconstitutional in accordance with Massachusetts law?

You're very dishonest
The first circuit court of appeals is a lower court and you're saying it's not. Faggots in the Massachusetts courts will say it's unconstitutional that's all they have to go on.

LMAO!! So the Massachusetts court justices have only state laws to go on when they rule something to be in violation of the US Constitution?? Are you serious??

You are actually claiming the federal appeals court justices only have Mass. law to go on?

Your very dishonest borderline rdean and truth don't matter you're claiming the 1st circuit court of appeals is not a lower court.

 

[WinterBorn]

You're very dishonest
The first circuit court of appeals is a lower court and you're saying it's not. Faggots in the Massachusetts courts will say it's unconstitutional that's all they have to go on.

LMAO!! So the Massachusetts court justices have only state laws to go on when they rule something to be in violation of the US Constitution?? Are you serious??

You are actually claiming the federal appeals court justices only have Mass. law to go on?

Your very dishonest borderline rdean and truth don't matter you're claiming the 1st circuit court of appeals is not a lower court.

Tell us more about the 1st Federal Court Court of Appeals basing decisions on Mass. state law?

 

[bigrebnc1775]

LMAO!! So the Massachusetts court justices have only state laws to go on when they rule something to be in violation of the US Constitution?? Are you serious??

You are actually claiming the federal appeals court justices only have Mass. law to go on?

Your very dishonest borderline rdean and truth don't matter you're claiming the 1st circuit court of appeals is not a lower court.

Tell us more about the 1st Federal Court Court of Appeals basing decisions on Mass. state law?

First things first you were being dishonest when you said the first circuit court of appeals was not a lower court?

 

[WinterBorn]

Your very dishonest borderline rdean and truth don't matter you're claiming the 1st circuit court of appeals is not a lower court.

Tell us more about the 1st Federal Court Court of Appeals basing decisions on Mass. state law?

First things first you were being dishonest when you said the first circuit court of appeals was not a lower court?

Considering the number of levels of courts, the next highest court is the land is not a lower court, in my opinion.

So now that this is settled, lets talk about what Massachusetts law has to do with the recent ruling by the 1st Federal Court of Appeals.