colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
How come no one is concerned about this origin of this MIT forensics team report but y’all get your panties in a twist with my satirical response?never provide credit / facts himself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How come no one is concerned about this origin of this MIT forensics team report but y’all get your panties in a twist with my satirical response?never provide credit / facts himself.
Well, give me an opportunity to question it. Give me your source.That’s my point. You guys are just passing around the same pile of shit without anyone questioning where it came from.The other guy may not have shit either, but I have seen the discussion and report elsewhere
Some of the funny things you guys believe is that people of the same party are in lockstep. You also believe your party is noble and “right”, and that republicans are evil crooks.There is absolutely no possible way that any reasonable person can’t see the corruption of the Democrats, from the FBI lying to the phony impeachment.
Some of the funny things you guys believe is that Comey and or Mueller were Democrats. Staunch Republican called the Ukraine Shakedown a "Drug Deal". The Mueller investigation was conducted under the republican controlled DOJ. Democats didn't hold the majority in either Branch of Congress until last year. When confronted with these realities, it becomes "it's the Deep State" and the Democrats hate the poor poor victim, the "Dirty Don".
You don’t need me to provide you the opportunity to question it. All you need to do is ask those who are actually perpetuating it.Well, give me an opportunity to question it. Give me your source.
Do you have a source or not?You don’t need me to provide you the opportunity to question it. All you need to do is ask those who are actually perpetuating it.Well, give me an opportunity to question it. Give me your source.
But that’s not what you’ve chosen to do.
Do you?Do you have a source or not?
Trump would not publish those figures if he was not confident that they can be proven to be true. He's probably undercutting what he has.One small problem, the Cat was delivered expired. It's already been looked at by the experts and they have determined that the Dominion Software software had nothing to do with fraud. Now, if you have something, please present it to the Penn State Supreme Court where they can see it and rule on it. But you won't do that. This air and unfounded allegations don't hold up in court so well.
You’re acting like a total douche. Some of us, like myself, was hoping you actually had sources refuting this. I like to see different perspectives.Oh. Gotcha. I saw my information on another message board too.I saw the information on another message board
I have this. It was actually on THIS forum that I saw it. I was mistakenly looking elsewhere to find it.Do you?Do you have a source or not?
None of you have called out the OP for a source. None of you.You’re acting like a total douche. Some of us, like myself, was hoping you actually had sources refuting this. I like to see different perspectives.
As it is, I don’t like that I haven’t seen a source for the OP’s claims yet.
You doing what you are doing isn’t productive either.
See the one above you.None of you have called out the OP for a source. None of you.You’re acting like a total douche. Some of us, like myself, was hoping you actually had sources refuting this. I like to see different perspectives.
As it is, I don’t like that I haven’t seen a source for the OP’s claims yet.
You doing what you are doing isn’t productive either.
I’ll provide a source to refute it when there’s something to refute. There should be as little tolerance for my ridiculous claim as there is for the OP’s yet we clearly see that I am the one subject to scorn.
How do you explain that?
This is clearly not what Billy Bob was talking about.I have this. It was actually on THIS forum that I saw it. I was mistakenly looking elsewhere to find it.
It says this:This is clearly not what Billy Bob was talking about.I have this. It was actually on THIS forum that I saw it. I was mistakenly looking elsewhere to find it.
There was a panel I was on recently for the National Academy of Sciences that produced a report called “Securing the Vote” (September 2018). That report recommended two things strongly: using paper ballots, and performing statistical post-election audits to check the tabulation of the paper ballots. In conjunction with other procedures (that, for example, ensure that the paper ballots checked are those that are cast and tabulated), one can develop confidence that our election outcomes are indeed correct.
Trump would not publish those figures if he was not confident that they can be proven to be true. He's probably undercutting what he has.One small problem, the Cat was delivered expired. It's already been looked at by the experts and they have determined that the Dominion Software software had nothing to do with fraud. Now, if you have something, please present it to the Penn State Supreme Court where they can see it and rule on it. But you won't do that. This air and unfounded allegations don't hold up in court so well.
Sure. But what does that have to do with Billy Bob’s claim?It says this:This is clearly not what Billy Bob was talking about.I have this. It was actually on THIS forum that I saw it. I was mistakenly looking elsewhere to find it.
There was a panel I was on recently for the National Academy of Sciences that produced a report called “Securing the Vote” (September 2018). That report recommended two things strongly: using paper ballots, and performing statistical post-election audits to check the tabulation of the paper ballots. In conjunction with other procedures (that, for example, ensure that the paper ballots checked are those that are cast and tabulated), one can develop confidence that our election outcomes are indeed correct.
Doesn't that say what we have been saying this whole time? We need a fucking audit?
MIT forensic teams have evaluated the software from over 50 machines and the scraping of votes is very real.
That's pretty much what the MIT article says. They have problems. There must be a tabulation and a hand count and forensic AUDIT (not a canvas) to ensure an accurate and secure outcome.Sure. But what does that have to do with Billy Bob’s claim?It says this:This is clearly not what Billy Bob was talking about.I have this. It was actually on THIS forum that I saw it. I was mistakenly looking elsewhere to find it.
There was a panel I was on recently for the National Academy of Sciences that produced a report called “Securing the Vote” (September 2018). That report recommended two things strongly: using paper ballots, and performing statistical post-election audits to check the tabulation of the paper ballots. In conjunction with other procedures (that, for example, ensure that the paper ballots checked are those that are cast and tabulated), one can develop confidence that our election outcomes are indeed correct.
Doesn't that say what we have been saying this whole time? We need a fucking audit?
MIT forensic teams have evaluated the software from over 50 machines and the scraping of votes is very real.
You keep posting and antagonizing. That explains it for me. I have been asking for the source of this, just not on here yet as I’ve heard it elsewhere.None of you have called out the OP for a source. None of you.You’re acting like a total douche. Some of us, like myself, was hoping you actually had sources refuting this. I like to see different perspectives.
As it is, I don’t like that I haven’t seen a source for the OP’s claims yet.
You doing what you are doing isn’t productive either.
I’ll provide a source to refute it when there’s something to refute. There should be as little tolerance for my ridiculous claim as there is for the OP’s yet we clearly see that I am the one subject to scorn.
How do you explain that?
It does not say that.That's pretty much what the MIT article says
We saw the voter Fraud so we accept it....Fraud???
If democrats were cheating McConnell and Graham would have lost in a landslide.
Sadly, many of those families were denied the ability to even Have proper funerals (due to trump's gross mishandling of this pandemic). His supporters care as little as he does.