Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?The only threat to Hillary is the only candidate losing to him?
Trump has yuuge negatives with women. Over 70%. Romney did well with him despite the war on women meme. There is no way trump beats him there. And if he can't beat Romney with women how is he going to win the election against a woman.
And that's not even factoring those of us men who wont vote for him because of how he treats women
actually, yes. the threat to Hillary would be if the GOP wee smart enough to run Kasich. but they aren't so it's all good.
It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
I can......without lying.......She's not a criminal, and it is YOU who is the liar, calling her a criminal....you can't even name what she did that was Criminal in her 8 years as a Senator and 4 years as secretary of State, without lying.Why?Who or what made you into the misogynist you have become?
calling a bitch a bitch does not make one a misogynist. Refusing to call a bitch a bitch makes one an idiot.
Personally I love and respect women and would have no issue voting for a female president. But Hillary Clinton is the worst possible female candidate----------------find us a Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir and she would have plenty of male votes.
Being opposed to Hillary has nothing to do with gender, being opposed to Obama has nothing to do with race.
Because she is a Democrat?
Because ''the republican establishment'' who you now supposedly hate, has been telling you this for decades?
no, because she is a liar, a criminal, and a terrible person who is only in it for her personal ego. she has never accomplished anything (except negligence the caused the deaths or 4 ameicans). She is an example of the worst that American politics can create.
again, it had nothing to do with gender or party, it has to do with who and what she is.
the establishment and the media have been covering for her for years, finally the American voters are waking up.
It is just Easy Peasy for you to just regurgitate, "She's a Criminal" with absolutely NO JUSTIFICATION OR PROOF, just the right wing establishment told you so and your right wing media propagandists told you so....
How bout Obstruction of Justice
Perjury under oath before Congress
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds
Mishandling Top Secret Information
Attempted destruction of state department property
Criminal negligence
Selling political influence while Secretary of State
Taking bribes
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail.
Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?The only threat to Hillary is the only candidate losing to him?
Trump has yuuge negatives with women. Over 70%. Romney did well with him despite the war on women meme. There is no way trump beats him there. And if he can't beat Romney with women how is he going to win the election against a woman.
And that's not even factoring those of us men who wont vote for him because of how he treats women
actually, yes. the threat to Hillary would be if the GOP wee smart enough to run Kasich. but they aren't so it's all good.
It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
The point is that she hasn't been charged because of who controls the Justice Department.....Obama....so far. If she wins the white house charges will never be filed....regardless of their validity.I can......without lying.......She's not a criminal, and it is YOU who is the liar, calling her a criminal....you can't even name what she did that was Criminal in her 8 years as a Senator and 4 years as secretary of State, without lying.Why?calling a bitch a bitch does not make one a misogynist. Refusing to call a bitch a bitch makes one an idiot.
Personally I love and respect women and would have no issue voting for a female president. But Hillary Clinton is the worst possible female candidate----------------find us a Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir and she would have plenty of male votes.
Being opposed to Hillary has nothing to do with gender, being opposed to Obama has nothing to do with race.
Because she is a Democrat?
Because ''the republican establishment'' who you now supposedly hate, has been telling you this for decades?
no, because she is a liar, a criminal, and a terrible person who is only in it for her personal ego. she has never accomplished anything (except negligence the caused the deaths or 4 ameicans). She is an example of the worst that American politics can create.
again, it had nothing to do with gender or party, it has to do with who and what she is.
the establishment and the media have been covering for her for years, finally the American voters are waking up.
It is just Easy Peasy for you to just regurgitate, "She's a Criminal" with absolutely NO JUSTIFICATION OR PROOF, just the right wing establishment told you so and your right wing media propagandists told you so....
How bout Obstruction of Justice
Perjury under oath before Congress
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds
Mishandling Top Secret Information
Attempted destruction of state department property
Criminal negligence
Selling political influence while Secretary of State
Taking bribes
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail.
How bout Obstruction of Justice - How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Perjury under oath before Congress- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course- HUH?
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds-HUH?
Mishandling Top Secret Information- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Attempted destruction of state department property- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Criminal negligence- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Selling political influence while Secretary of State- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Taking bribes-How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail -How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged? Please provide this PROOF that you say they have....
Win or lose Trump has exposed the establishment and if the establishment wins and goes right back to business as usual Trump will spend the next 4 years saying I TOLD YOU SO.
I can......without lying.......She's not a criminal, and it is YOU who is the liar, calling her a criminal....you can't even name what she did that was Criminal in her 8 years as a Senator and 4 years as secretary of State, without lying.Why?calling a bitch a bitch does not make one a misogynist. Refusing to call a bitch a bitch makes one an idiot.
Personally I love and respect women and would have no issue voting for a female president. But Hillary Clinton is the worst possible female candidate----------------find us a Margaret Thatcher or Golda Meir and she would have plenty of male votes.
Being opposed to Hillary has nothing to do with gender, being opposed to Obama has nothing to do with race.
Because she is a Democrat?
Because ''the republican establishment'' who you now supposedly hate, has been telling you this for decades?
no, because she is a liar, a criminal, and a terrible person who is only in it for her personal ego. she has never accomplished anything (except negligence the caused the deaths or 4 ameicans). She is an example of the worst that American politics can create.
again, it had nothing to do with gender or party, it has to do with who and what she is.
the establishment and the media have been covering for her for years, finally the American voters are waking up.
It is just Easy Peasy for you to just regurgitate, "She's a Criminal" with absolutely NO JUSTIFICATION OR PROOF, just the right wing establishment told you so and your right wing media propagandists told you so....
How bout Obstruction of Justice
Perjury under oath before Congress
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds
Mishandling Top Secret Information
Attempted destruction of state department property
Criminal negligence
Selling political influence while Secretary of State
Taking bribes
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail.
How bout Obstruction of Justice - How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Perjury under oath before Congress- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course- HUH?
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds-HUH?
Mishandling Top Secret Information- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Attempted destruction of state department property- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Criminal negligence- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Selling political influence while Secretary of State- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Taking bribes-How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail -How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged? Please provide this PROOF that you say they have....
Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?The only threat to Hillary is the only candidate losing to him?
Trump has yuuge negatives with women. Over 70%. Romney did well with him despite the war on women meme. There is no way trump beats him there. And if he can't beat Romney with women how is he going to win the election against a woman.
And that's not even factoring those of us men who wont vote for him because of how he treats women
actually, yes. the threat to Hillary would be if the GOP wee smart enough to run Kasich. but they aren't so it's all good.
It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
You simply want to trounce all over everybody's rights.
So you're proof is that a corrupt establishment in Washington hasn't charged her yet.I can......without lying.......She's not a criminal, and it is YOU who is the liar, calling her a criminal....you can't even name what she did that was Criminal in her 8 years as a Senator and 4 years as secretary of State, without lying.Why?
Because she is a Democrat?
Because ''the republican establishment'' who you now supposedly hate, has been telling you this for decades?
no, because she is a liar, a criminal, and a terrible person who is only in it for her personal ego. she has never accomplished anything (except negligence the caused the deaths or 4 ameicans). She is an example of the worst that American politics can create.
again, it had nothing to do with gender or party, it has to do with who and what she is.
the establishment and the media have been covering for her for years, finally the American voters are waking up.
It is just Easy Peasy for you to just regurgitate, "She's a Criminal" with absolutely NO JUSTIFICATION OR PROOF, just the right wing establishment told you so and your right wing media propagandists told you so....
How bout Obstruction of Justice
Perjury under oath before Congress
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds
Mishandling Top Secret Information
Attempted destruction of state department property
Criminal negligence
Selling political influence while Secretary of State
Taking bribes
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail.
How bout Obstruction of Justice - How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Perjury under oath before Congress- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Bribing a president by offering him a Supreme Court position....jokingly of course- HUH?
Stealing 6 billion in state department funds-HUH?
Mishandling Top Secret Information- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Attempted destruction of state department property- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Criminal negligence- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Selling political influence while Secretary of State- How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Taking bribes-How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged?
Hillary is also guilty of espionage when she transmitted TS information over a non-secure server. They have the proof already. Hillary is literally running to keep out of jail -How so, when and where and what for and why was she not charged? Please provide this PROOF that you say they have....
Unsupported allegations are the grist for character assassins too stupid and too dishonest to offer an opinion based on evidence, or to explain why they hold such animus for another. Either the evidence exists or it does not, and the evidence that is does not seems to have been confirmed by a number of Congressional Witch Hunts.
Of course those challenged by reality will find ways to conjure up conspiracies to prove their fantasies, but those not challenged by reality will see the logical fallacies, and the lies, half-truths, innuendos and rumors posted by the assassins and echoed by the biddable for what they are: Partisan Bullshit!
That’s what a balanced court is you fucking tool.Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?actually, yes. the threat to Hillary would be if the GOP wee smart enough to run Kasich. but they aren't so it's all good.
It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
You simply want to trounce all over everybody's rights.
You are insane. 5-4 decisions do not show a balanced court, they're evidence of a court divided by ideology.
Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?actually, yes. the threat to Hillary would be if the GOP wee smart enough to run Kasich. but they aren't so it's all good.
It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
You simply want to trounce all over everybody's rights.
You are insane. 5-4 decisions do not show a balanced court, they're evidence of a court divided by ideology.
Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?It is a long time in politics from now until the conventions, but if the tell tale signs are correct, we will see internecine break out in force at the Republican Convention, if they nominate Trump or if they do not nominate Trump. Kasich is the smart choice, as was Huntsman in 2012, but when have the R's made a smart choice? McCain and Palin? Romney, GWBush?
The real question mark is this, can the Republican Party survive?
Once the D's were characterized as the party of cats which could not be herded. Today the Republican Party has fractured into regional and ideological pieces whose single common interest is to thwart HRC of her parties nomination and election to the office of POTUS. Is that enough to win the popular vote?
Not when 70% of women oppose Trump, minorities too, who also oppose Cruz and have a legitimate fear that another extreme conservative will replace Scalia. and continue nonsensical and ideological decisions on a 5-4 vote, which seem to benefit the power elite and leave the hoi polloi majority out in the cold.
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
You simply want to trounce all over everybody's rights.
You are insane. 5-4 decisions do not show a balanced court, they're evidence of a court divided by ideology.
you disingenuous asshole. if it was 5-4 your way you would be screaming that the SC reflects the will of the people. Actually at the moment its 4-4, which probably isn't too bad.
Still trying to figure out all of the fear mongering. A balanced court is better than one that is too far in either direction.Fear that another conservative will replace Scalia?
Which means the court remains the same?
The same court that granted same-sex marriage and gave us Obamacare?
This is what you fear?
The same court which voted 5-4 on both issues, and the CJ was attacked by the crazy right wing? Those two were social issues, and notwithstanding the meme that CU cases were about Free Speech, they were completely political and a means to an end, that giving even more power to the power elite to impact elections to benefit the haves at the expense of the have nots.
You simply want to trounce all over everybody's rights.
You are insane. 5-4 decisions do not show a balanced court, they're evidence of a court divided by ideology.
you disingenuous asshole. if it was 5-4 your way you would be screaming that the SC reflects the will of the people. Actually at the moment its 4-4, which probably isn't too bad.
it isn't the job of the supreme court to "reflect the will of the people".
What does terrorists have to do with it?Don't Let The Establishment Win...
sounds like paranoid terrorist hyperbole.
In what manner does the OP plan on not letting the establishment win? Sounded like a paranoid statement to fish out the lunatic fringe from their armed stockpiles in underground bunkers in the woods.What does terrorists have to do with it?Don't Let The Establishment Win...
sounds like paranoid terrorist hyperbole.
Trump is polling low no thanks to the GOP.Trump can't win anyway. He's 10 points or more behind both Sanders and Clinton and it's getting to be the time of year where polling tends to remain stable through the election.
Donald Trump has collapsed in general election polls
In what manner does the OP plan on not letting the establishment win? Sounded like a paranoid statement to fish out the lunatic fringe from their armed stockpiles in underground bunkers in the woods.What does terrorists have to do with it?Don't Let The Establishment Win...
sounds like paranoid terrorist hyperbole.
Trump is polling low no thanks to the GOP.Trump can't win anyway. He's 10 points or more behind both Sanders and Clinton and it's getting to be the time of year where polling tends to remain stable through the election.
Donald Trump has collapsed in general election polls
Trump hasn't even begun to hammer Hillary. By the time he gets through with her, her poll numbers will be in the toilet. If the GOP would stop trying to destroy him and start going after Hillary it would be no contest.
