Don't Like Trump ? WHY ?

[Aries]

It would take me much longer than one day to compile decades worth of evidence. You want ONE piece to prove each? Okay.

One piece of evidence that he’s a racist would be the number of times he was sued for discrimination. Him and his father discrimated against minorities in their hotel business when he was just starting out. The following decade he was discriminating against minority employees at his casinos in NJ. There are also hundreds of quotes where he very clearly states what he thinks of minorities. But like I said I don’t have all day.

One piece of evidence that he’s a sexist is how he talks about women. To Donnie, women are only as useful as they are pleasing to the eye. We know this because when he’s happy with a woman he praises their beauty and when he is unhappy with a woman he attacks their appearance. Again there are hundreds of direct quotes that state exactly what he thinks of women but I don’t have all day.

Here’s one that touches both- calling former miss America miss housekeeping because of her Hispanic background. As if Hispanic women were only good enough to clean his hotel rooms.

He’s a total fraud. That can be deduced from his thousands of lies since running for office. My personal favorite shred of evidence for this one is Trump U.

You failed on the racist charge. You said that Trump IS a racist (present tense). Then you presented unsourced examples from the 1970s and 80s. 20 and 40 years ago. And you don't need "hundreds of quotes' or "all day" I asked for just ONE. You didn't deliver. FAIL.

Regarding the women, again you went to the "hundreds'' and the "all day' DODGE. FAILED again. Also, Trump hired women to executive positions in the 1970s, long before it was customary to do so. He still does today in 2017. (ex. Elaine Chao - Sect of Labor)

As for the "miss housekeeping", got a source / Got link ? Got anything ? Or are we supposed to take this on faith ? I don't watch CNN fake news, so I never heard of this.

How is Trump U a lie ? You got an explanation for that ?

Can’t teach an old dog new tricks. He was raised a racist and is still a racist. There are plenty of recent examples. Saying a fed court judge couldn’t be trusted to make a fair ruling because his Mexican descent is racist.

This is all common knowledge it’s not my fault you can’t use google. Try it, it’s so easy, and then no one else will have to do your homework for you.

So, the black singer who ordered the white people to go to the back? She be a racist too?

I havent the slightest clue what your talking about so I can’t answer without more info.

 

[radical right]

I looked at it. Which was the link to the video Trump claimed to show NJ Muslims celebrating?

I said nothing about a video. That isn't necessary. Muslims cheered after 9-11. That's what matters. .

Trump claimed there was video of thousands of muslims in new jersey cheering for 9-11. That was a lie, pure and simple.

 

[eddiew37]

It really is mystifying to see so many people, not only not liking Donald Trump, but absolutely hating him, with a passion. I could see having feeelings like that against really bad people like Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton, but Trump ? Why ? For what reason ?

Seems to me that we're lucky to finally have a guy who is protecting us from harmful, unbridled immigration (including Muslims), finally doing something about our worst racial discrimination problem (affirmative action), standing up for our military and police, opposing LGBT lunacy, and supporting our 2nd amendment rights.

In addition, Trump is standing up for the Made in USA label, working to get US businesses back in the US, and has brought back the best economy in America since the 1990's, with 2 straight months of above 3% GDP growth and a 4.1% unemployment rate (also best in decades).

Oh, so it's the demeanor is it ? The style ? Not "presidential" you say ? Too much talking like a regular guy, huh ? Well, for those for us who voted for Trump, and support him right through all the media anti-Trump smear campaign, that regular/ordinary talk is what we like about Trump. We see that as the way "presidential" ought to be.

So, liberals, RINOs, or anti-Trumpers of all stripes, please cite here what your complaints are about him, SPECIFICALLY, and let's see if we can iron things out a bit. How about the tweets. Got any you could point out ? Don't be shy.

I have no opinion of him, good or bad. Waiting to see how his first year or two go.

You might not have an opinion but those leaving his administration, his congress sure do Maybe you're smarter than they are?

 

[Aries]

Opinions differ as whether his is 'normal' but you also said: "He's says it like it is". This clearly is not true as he is serial liar. In my experience that is not normal.

Present ONE example of a lie that you think Trump has told. I've been hearing about Trump's so-called "lies" for 2 days now, and have issued numerous challenges. So far, none have been answered.

Although this was August I’m sure he’s doubled it by now.
Analysis | President Trump’s list of false and misleading claims tops 1,000

 

[Mudda]

I don't disagree with SOME of his policies (not liking the hate against the LGTB crowd for no reason, or his support for white supremacists), but he's got the personality of a total slimeball and bully, plus, he's not overly smart, to put it mildly.

Trump does NOT support white supremacists, despite the fake news idiocy from the leftist media.

As for opposition to the LGBT crowd, it is nothing more than how we treat crazy people , which is what they are, and so are you if you support them.

You pick on and bully people you don't even know for no apparent reason. You disgust me.

 

[ph3iron]

It really is mystifying to see so many people, not only not liking Donald Trump, but absolutely hating him, with a passion. I could see having feeelings like that against really bad people like Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton, but Trump ? Why ? For what reason ?

Seems to me that we're lucky to finally have a guy who is protecting us from harmful, unbridled immigration (including Muslims), finally doing something about our worst racial discrimination problem (affirmative action), standing up for our military and police, opposing LGBT lunacy, and supporting our 2nd amendment rights.

In addition, Trump is standing up for the Made in USA label, working to get US businesses back in the US, and has brought back the best economy in America since the 1990's, with 2 straight months of above 3% GDP growth and a 4.1% unemployment rate (also best in decades).

Oh, so it's the demeanor is it ? The style ? Not "presidential" you say ? Too much talking like a regular guy, huh ? Well, for those for us who voted for Trump, and support him right through all the media anti-Trump smear campaign, that regular/ordinary talk is what we like about Trump. We see that as the way "presidential" ought to be.

So, liberals, RINOs, or anti-Trumpers of all stripes, please cite here what your complaints are about him, SPECIFICALLY, and let's see if we can iron things out a bit. How about the tweets. Got any you could point out ? Don't be shy.

It really is mystifying to see so many people, not only not liking Donald Trump, but absolutely hating him, with a passion. I could see having feeelings like that against really bad people like Barrack Obama or Hillary Clinton, but Trump ? Why ? For what reason ?

Seems to me that we're lucky to finally have a guy who is protecting us from harmful, unbridled immigration (including Muslims), finally doing something about our worst racial discrimination problem (affirmative action), standing up for our military and police, opposing LGBT lunacy, and supporting our 2nd amendment rights.

In addition, Trump is standing up for the Made in USA label, working to get US businesses back in the US, and has brought back the best economy in America since the 1990's, with 2 straight months of above 3% GDP growth and a 4.1% unemployment rate (also best in decades).

Oh, so it's the demeanor is it ? The style ? Not "presidential" you say ? Too much talking like a regular guy, huh ? Well, for those for us who voted for Trump, and support him right through all the media anti-Trump smear campaign, that regular/ordinary talk is what we like about Trump. We see that as the way "presidential" ought to be.

So, liberals, RINOs, or anti-Trumpers of all stripes, please cite here what your complaints are about him, SPECIFICALLY, and let's see if we can iron things out a bit. How about the tweets. Got any you could point out ? Don't be shy.

Hopefully I don't hate anybody, leave it to the hill and Obama haters here? Apart from his web site devoted to his lies and in ny "being trumped" means being screwed out of your money.
I like him building a dune in front of a north sea old ladies housewho wouldn't sell to him.
And dragging his wife by the hair before raping her after she laughed at his latest weave.
A small man in every sense of the word

 

[Aries]

I don't disagree with SOME of his policies (not liking the hate against the LGTB crowd for no reason, or his support for white supremacists), but he's got the personality of a total slimeball and bully, plus, he's not overly smart, to put it mildly.

Trump does NOT support white supremacists, despite the fake news idiocy from the leftist media.

As for opposition to the LGBT crowd, it is nothing more than how we treat crazy people , which is what they are, and so are you if you support them.

You pick on and bully people you don't even know for no apparent reason. You disgust me.

Bully’s for trump and trump for bully’s. They’re cut from the same cloth.

 

[ph3iron]

Liberals hate anything that's American

Boy, such in depth thought.
Looked up the def of liberal yet? For the individual and small gov
No Latin in college?
No college?
Most trumpettes don't
Maybe you should stick to your pedal car

 

[ph3iron]

The left hates him because he is a male, he is white, he is rich, he is successful, and he tells the god awful truth about them. Oh did I forget? They hate him because he is a Republican. It should be noted that they hate black Republicans with equal ferocity. Oh did I forget? They hate him because he loves America.

Liar. You are a liar mimicking your liar leader. Your leader is a foul person with no character, class, or dignity. He is a creep pussy grabbing perv. A sexual degenerate.

Affectionately known as the C grabber in the ROW and outside the uneducated old white fart cult here

 

[protectionist]

Hopefully I don't hate anybody, leave it to the hill and Obama haters here? Apart from his web site devoted to his lies and in ny "being trumped" means being screwed out of your money.
I like him building a dune in front of a north sea old ladies housewho wouldn't sell to him.
And dragging his wife by the hair before raping her after she laughed at his latest weave.
A small man in every sense of the word

Sounds like they've got you programmed.

 

[protectionist]

Sanctuary cities don't cost anything. Those sanctuary cities are the ones paying your welfare, by the way.

You're welcome.

Sanctuary cities cost Americans jobs + they cost us businesses $133 Billion/year in lost sales (immigrant remittances$$$), and they facilitate imperialism against the US by the remittance recipient countries.

They are also illegal and every political leaders in these cities, counties or states should be imprisoned in federal prisons for violations of illegal harboring.

U.S. Code › Title 8 › Chapter 12 › Subchapter II › Part VIII › § 132
§ 1324.
Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
(a) Criminal penalties
(1)
(A) Any person who—
alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law;


8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

 

[protectionist]

Bla bla ever been outside the US?

No reason to be. Other then to fight and stop jihadists.

 

[radical right]

harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law;


8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

Don't ask, don't tell.

 

[protectionist]

2. You can't judge PolitiFact by your extreme immigration standards. You can't deflect what PolitiFact says about Trump by listing things about Clinton. That makes no sense.
3. The NYT is a world class newspaper. It may have a moderate liberal bias but most news sources are not moderate. What do you accept as a source?
4. Your previous post provided no evidence of the video Trump claimed to have seen.
5. I referred to Trump's claim that Obama didn't call the families of slain servicemen: “If you look at President Obama and other presidents, most of them didn’t make calls”. He later admitted this might be incorrect but it was what he was told.
7. Democrats are the opposition party so what has Trump done to work with them? He has made deals with either one party or the other but he hasn't been able to bring both together. It can be said the GOP are opposing Trump's desire for compromises.

My standards are in no way "extreme"..They reflect FACT. jobs taken from Americans, Dollars lost from US businesses and the economy, and numerous other HARMS to Americans.

Politifact - I have heard more idiotic things said by their people than I can count - just read the link for a prime example. (about their moronic statement about Syrain refugee "vetting" (of which there is no such thing)

HA HA HA. The NY Times is an idiot newspaper, and has been ever since the National Enquirer showed what fools the Times writers were, way back in 1979. Stupid Times thought they could insult the Enquirer and get away with it. Aren't you aware of the Oil Shortage story ? I guess CNN has that one well hidden too, huh ?
The NYT was trounced in a credibility dispute with the National Enquirer, over 35 years ago. Maybe you're not old enough to remember ? The tabloids came out on top with good credibility, while the Times sunk to near zero. And the Times has suffered numerous credibility bruises ever since.

For all the youngsters in here, who don't remember, here's the 1979 fiasco where the Enquirer kicked the Times' ass, and hard. Both the Enquirer and the Times made this quote >> "The oil shortage is a hoax".

In the Times, the quote began with "According to an unknown spokesman"....

In the Enquirer, the quote began with >> "According to Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio), head of the Senate Energy Committee"....

The Times, not realizing the Enquirer had already gone to print, with a fully sourced quote, attacked the Enquirer for its veracity and sourcing. They never fully recovered from this embarrassment, and have been exposed with one screw-up after another for decades. Here's an example of one of their later ones (December 2015), pertaining to the San Bernardino terrorists.

http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.c...rection-margaret-sullivan-public-editor/?_r=0

 

[alang1216]

2. You can't judge PolitiFact by your extreme immigration standards. You can't deflect what PolitiFact says about Trump by listing things about Clinton. That makes no sense.
3. The NYT is a world class newspaper. It may have a moderate liberal bias but most news sources are not moderate. What do you accept as a source?
4. Your previous post provided no evidence of the video Trump claimed to have seen.
5. I referred to Trump's claim that Obama didn't call the families of slain servicemen: “If you look at President Obama and other presidents, most of them didn’t make calls”. He later admitted this might be incorrect but it was what he was told.
7. Democrats are the opposition party so what has Trump done to work with them? He has made deals with either one party or the other but he hasn't been able to bring both together. It can be said the GOP are opposing Trump's desire for compromises.

My standards are in no way "extreme"..They reflect FACT. jobs taken from Americans, Dollars lost from US businesses and the economy, and numerous other HARMS to Americans.

Politifact - I have heard more idiotic things said by their people than I can count - just read the link for a prime example. (about their moronic statement about Syrain refugee "vetting" (of which there is no such thing)

HA HA HA. The NY Times is an idiot newspaper, and has been ever since the National Enquirer showed what fools the Times writers were, way back in 1979. Stupid Times thought they could insult the Enquirer and get away with it. Aren't you aware of the Oil Shortage story ? I guess CNN has that one well hidden too, huh ?
The NYT was trounced in a credibility dispute with the National Enquirer, over 35 years ago. Maybe you're not old enough to remember ? The tabloids came out on top with good credibility, while the Times sunk to near zero. And the Times has suffered numerous credibility bruises ever since.

For all the youngsters in here, who don't remember, here's the 1979 fiasco where the Enquirer kicked the Times' ass, and hard. Both the Enquirer and the Times made this quote >> "The oil shortage is a hoax".

In the Times, the quote began with "According to an unknown spokesman"....

In the Enquirer, the quote began with >> "According to Senator Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio), head of the Senate Energy Committee"....

The Times, not realizing the Enquirer had already gone to print, with a fully sourced quote, attacked the Enquirer for its veracity and sourcing. They never fully recovered from this embarrassment, and have been exposed with one screw-up after another for decades. Here's an example of one of their later ones (December 2015), pertaining to the San Bernardino terrorists.

http://publiceditor.blogs.nytimes.c...rection-margaret-sullivan-public-editor/?_r=0

Since you don't accept the NYT or PolitFact as legitimate sources of information would you mind telling me what sources you use that are honest and unbiased?

 

[protectionist]

Don't ask, don't tell.

We'll ask, We'll tell. We'll arrest. We'll try. We'll convict. We'll imprison.

Sanctuary city leaders might start looking for a non-extradition country to escape to. Syria, anyone ?

 

[WillowTree]

It would take me much longer than one day to compile decades worth of evidence. You want ONE piece to prove each? Okay.

One piece of evidence that he’s a racist would be the number of times he was sued for discrimination. Him and his father discrimated against minorities in their hotel business when he was just starting out. The following decade he was discriminating against minority employees at his casinos in NJ. There are also hundreds of quotes where he very clearly states what he thinks of minorities. But like I said I don’t have all day.

One piece of evidence that he’s a sexist is how he talks about women. To Donnie, women are only as useful as they are pleasing to the eye. We know this because when he’s happy with a woman he praises their beauty and when he is unhappy with a woman he attacks their appearance. Again there are hundreds of direct quotes that state exactly what he thinks of women but I don’t have all day.

Here’s one that touches both- calling former miss America miss housekeeping because of her Hispanic background. As if Hispanic women were only good enough to clean his hotel rooms.

He’s a total fraud. That can be deduced from his thousands of lies since running for office. My personal favorite shred of evidence for this one is Trump U.

You failed on the racist charge. You said that Trump IS a racist (present tense). Then you presented unsourced examples from the 1970s and 80s. 20 and 40 years ago. And you don't need "hundreds of quotes' or "all day" I asked for just ONE. You didn't deliver. FAIL.

Regarding the women, again you went to the "hundreds'' and the "all day' DODGE. FAILED again. Also, Trump hired women to executive positions in the 1970s, long before it was customary to do so. He still does today in 2017. (ex. Elaine Chao - Sect of Labor)

As for the "miss housekeeping", got a source / Got link ? Got anything ? Or are we supposed to take this on faith ? I don't watch CNN fake news, so I never heard of this.

How is Trump U a lie ? You got an explanation for that ?

Can’t teach an old dog new tricks. He was raised a racist and is still a racist. There are plenty of recent examples. Saying a fed court judge couldn’t be trusted to make a fair ruling because his Mexican descent is racist.

This is all common knowledge it’s not my fault you can’t use google. Try it, it’s so easy, and then no one else will have to do your homework for you.

So, the black singer who ordered the white people to go to the back? She be a racist too?

I havent the slightest clue what your talking about so I can’t answer without more info.

How convenient. I bet if I mentioned a white telling blacks to go to the back you wouldn’t need more info. It would be a slam dunk knee jerk.

 

[radical right]

Don't ask, don't tell.

We'll ask, We'll tell. We'll arrest. We'll try. We'll convict. We'll imprison.

Sanctuary city leaders might start looking for a non-extradition country to escape to. Syria, anyone ?

You know that people take advantage of illegals for that very reason. One lady was forced to work for the equivilent of $1 a day, and when she wanted to complain, they told her they would call ICE. And even though what they did was illegal (the same as kidnapping) they knew deporting her would mean there were no witnesses against them.

 

[protectionist]

Since you don't accept the NYT or PolitFact as legitimate sources of information would you mind telling me what sources you use that are honest and unbiased?

Greg Jarrett (on Fox News) is who I got the law regarding sanctuary cities from., with that sourced from Cornell University Law School.

8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens

While I have found some stuff on Fox less than perfect, mostly they do present valid reports, and yes they are fair and balanced. Balanced with many liberals on the staff. The same cant be said for CNN or MSNBC.

Fox liberals >> past & present >> Bill Beckel, Kristen Powers, Alan Colmes, Susan Estrich, Juan Williams, Lanny Davis, Doug Schoen, Geraldine Ferraro, Sally Kohn, Geraldo Rivera, Tamara Holder, Dennis Kucinich, Leslie Marshall, Lis Wiehl.

I also regard FAIR as honest/unbiased, NumbersUSA, and Act for America. And many of the books I've read well sourced with thousands of footnotes ..from Brigitte Gabriel, Robert Spencer, Paul Sperry, P. David Gaubatz, Ann Coulter, Lou Dobbs, Pat Buchanan, Gerald Posner, et al

In the book Muslim Mafia, Paul Sperry and P. David Gaubatz present 52 pages of CAIR internal documents Xeroxed and printed. Can't beat that for honesty.

 

[protectionist]

You know that people take advantage of illegals for that very reason. One lady was forced to work for the equivilent of $1 a day, and when she wanted to complain, they told her they would call ICE. And even though what they did was illegal (the same as kidnapping) they knew deporting her would mean there were no witnesses against them.

1. She wasn't forced to work there. She could have stayed in her home country.

2. The people who knew of her illegal status, and deliberately kept it quiet, are guilty of obstruction of justice. They should be prosecuted too.