logical4u
citizen
- Aug 19, 2009
- 6,111
- 543
Well, the paying out of reparations would signal that whites had done something "immoral and wrong", which they today summarily dismiss as "the price of doing business" and ultimately improving the lives of Africans, who, otherwise, would have been trapped in Third World realities. How many times have I heard, that I'm better off due to slavery? LOL
Well then we'd have to track back to the first white child slaves in America and get the Brits to pay reparations for them.
Oh and the number of First Nations who held slaves. Well I guess we'd have to have First Nation pay First Nations for their slave trading.
Oh and then there were the black slave owners.....
Uh no we wouldnt since there was no agreement to do so...40 acres and a Mule was promised no matter how many other things you throw in it wont effect that truth
The blacks that came forward were offered forty acres and a mule. A few took it, most did not, because the forty acres were not "cleared", worked land. It was raw land (in some cases, swamp), most did not want it (it meant working harder than they had to as slaves). The ones that did take it were like other people, some made it, some did not. The gov't is not know for "real" generosity. It is usually a ploy for the gov't's purposes, not a "gift" to the citizen.... Pay attention, those that think gov't health care is a good thing....