- Aug 4, 2018
- 63,292
- 27,935
It was not attained legally is what Durham is saying. It it was attained legally then there is no case.It’s much less of a problem if it’s obtained legally.
And it was despite your false claims it was hacked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was not attained legally is what Durham is saying. It it was attained legally then there is no case.It’s much less of a problem if it’s obtained legally.
And it was despite your false claims it was hacked.
That is what Durham will try to do. Conspiracy to lie about Trump in order to win the election. Are you not following the story?Prosecutors can get a grand jury to indict. Don’t be pedantic. You’ve no doubt heard the phrase.
Conspiracy to do what?
Prosecutors can get a grand jury to indict. Don’t be pedantic. You’ve no doubt heard the phrase.
Conspiracy to do what?
We can never trust them again. We cannot forget. For there are already enough people who are blinded and keep voting for this. We even get vilified for trying to get some of our own out of office. The swamp is in control. And it is all encompassing.Just to be clear, the coup wasn't just attempted; it was successful. Is Trump still President?
No. Durham never says anything of the sort.It was not attained legally is what Durham is saying. It it was attained legally then there is no case.
I won't even attempt to dispute what you said. What I will do though, is remind you that Trump, at times, is his own worst enemy. That doesn't come from a far Leftist, nor someone on the far right, it comes from someone who sees reality, and not how the GOP views him, nor how the Democrats view him, but rather how someone who is in the middle views him.Just to be clear, the coup wasn't just attempted; it was successful. Is Trump still President?
I’ve been following Sussmann’s case relatively closely. It’s not as strong as you think and Sussmann is a good lawyer with good lawyers working for him.That is what Durham will try to do. Conspiracy to lie about Trump in order to win the election. Are you not following the story?
I disagree. Guess we ll find out.No. Durham never says anything of the sort.
You realize the case is about whether Sussmann lied about who he was representing, right? The case has basically nothing to do with the legality of the data.
It’s not about what I think. It’s about what happened and whether laws were broken so it doesn’t happen again.I’ve been following Sussmann’s case relatively closely. It’s not as strong as you think and Sussmann is a good lawyer with good lawyers working for him.
Im not predicting the future, but there’s a very good chance that Sussmann walks and it’s not because everything is corrupt. It’s because Durham doesn’t have an open and shut case. He’s got a weak case he filed just before the statute of limitations ran out and then asked for the trial to be put off later so they could get their shit together.
He is digging for a conspiracy charge but he’s a pretty far ways away from it and throwing shade with these suggestion of conflict is how he tells people about it without having to actually prove anything in court since he hasn’t gotten an indictment about it.
Disseminated might be a bit of a strong word. The data really only went back to the government through Sussmann.They didn't actually, as far as we know so far, hack Whitehouse computers, because they had access to the computers as a trusted contract services provider. But to steal and disseminate the data from those contracted services would definitely be conspiracy and data theft.
Well you already declared facts which have yet to be proven in a court of law and which are contested by Sussmann.It’s not about what I think. It’s about what happened and whether laws were broken so it doesn’t happen again.
You realize your claim is regarding what is said in a publicly available document.I disagree. Guess we ll find out.
You, of course, being the sole arbiter of what's factual.No, I mean being up anything relevant that is substantiated by anything factual.
I trust our court system.Well you already declared facts which have yet to be proven in a court of law and which are contested by Sussmann.
But I’m worried that Sussmann gets off and the typical crowd will cry that it’s just corruption without understanding the underlying weakness of the case.
Maybe Biden should just pardon everyone because “all presidents pardon” and that is just fine.